대한화학회지 (Journal of the Korean Chemical Society)

  • 제55권4호
  • /
  • Pages.697-702
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1017-2548(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-8530(eISSN)
대한화학회 (Korean Chemical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

층상 페로브스카이트 구조인 La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.5-xFexO4 (x=0.15, 0.3) 망가나이트의 구조적, 전기적, 자기적 특성의 연구

Investigation on the Structural, Electrical and Magnetic Properties of Layered Perovskite Manganite La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.5-xFexO4 (x=0.15, 0.3) System

  • 투고 : 2011.05.20
  • 심사 : 2011.06.30
  • 발행 : 2011.08.20
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

새로운 층상구조인 페로브스카이트 망가나이트 $La_{0.5}Sr_{1.5}Mn_{0.5}Cr_{0.5-x}Fe_xO_4$ (x=0.15, 0.3) 를 세라믹 방법에 의해 합성하였다. 분말 X-선 측정을 통하여 I4/mmm 의 정방정계 단위세포를 확인하였다. 전기전도도 측정을 통하여 부도체의 특성을 확인하였으며 전기전도도는 3D 홉핑 메커니즘에 의해 나타난다. 자기적 특성은 모두 반강자성의 특성을 보인다.

The new layered perovskite manganites $La_{0.5}Sr_{1.5}Mn_{0.5}Cr_{0.5-x}Fe_xO_4$ (x=0.15, 0.3) have been prepared by standard ceramic method. The powder X-ray diffraction studies show that the phases crystallize with tetragonal unit cell in the space group I4/mmm. The electrical transport properties suggest that the phases show insulating behaviour and the electrical conduction in the phases occurs by a 3D variable range hopping mechanism. The magnetic properties suggest that both the phases are antiferromagnetic.

키워드

INTRODUCTION

Layered perovskite oxides are a promising group of mixed-conducting materials with potential applications for oxygen-separation membranes, gas sensor devices and electrodes of intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuelcells.1-4 In general, the layered perovskite can be represented as Ruddlesden-Popper (RP) series of general formula An+1BnO3n+1 or AO.(ABO3)n, where A is an alkaline earth/rare earth ion and B is a transition metal ion. These phases generally crystallize with tetragonal or orthorhombic unit cell in the space group I4/mmm or Fmmm and are antiferromagnetic electrical insulators in physical behaviour.5-8 The crystal structure of RP phases can be described by the stacking of finite n layers of perovskite ABO3 between rock salt AO layers along the crystallographic c direction.9,10 The corner-sharing BO6 octahedra form infinite sheets in the ab plane where strong electronic interactions can occur. The n=1 member of this series (A2BO4) exhibits a quasi-two-dimensional K2NiF4-type structure (Fig. 1), with only one layer of corner sharing BO6 octahedra along the c direction. The nature of A and B ions plays an important role in determining their physical properties. In many cases, more than one ions have been added at the sites A and B to look for novel physical properties such as electric transport and magnetic behaviour.11-13

In the past few years, the layered manganites La2-2xSr1+2xMn2O7 of Ruddlesden-Popper phases (n=2) attracted considerable attention due to their novel physical properties such as the colossal magnetoresistance effect, the tunneling magnetoresistance and fascinating magnetic properties because of mixed valence of manganese.14-16 It is well known that the correlation between the magnetic and electrical properties in the mixed-valence manganites is generally understood in terms of the double exchange (DE) interaction mechanism.17 Besides the DE mechanism, the Jahn-Teller effect, phase separation (PS)18 and antiferromagnetic (AFM) superexchange and charge-orbital ordering interactions also play an important role. In order to get further understanding of this mechanism, Mn-site doping in the layered manganites can dramatically change the magnetic and electrical properties. Some such studies have been undertaken during the past few years.19-25 Cr and Fe are very interesting substitution ions for Mn site. The choice of Cr3+ is based on the fact that its electronic structure is same as that of Mn4+ and its ionic radius (0.62A) is smaller than that of the Mn3+ (0.65 A). For the Fe3+ ion, its ionic radius is close the Mn3+ ionic radius.26 Fe and Cr are the nearest neighbors of Mn in the periodic table and they are non-Jahn-Teller ions. Some reports on the effect of Cr and Fe doping in the cubic perovskite manganites have appeared, and several reports on such studies have also appeared in case of bilayered manganites.27-31 Some authors have proposed that there may be ferromagnetic (FM) DE interaction between Cr3+ and Mn3+ just as between Mn4+ and Mn3+. On the other hand, the Fe3+ ion is usually unable to participate in the double exchange interaction- the ferromagnetic interactions Mn4+-O-Mn3+ are destroyed and replaced by antiferromagnetic Mn4+-O-Fe3+ interactions, which lead to a progressive dilution of ferromagnetism.32-36 Because of this, Fe and Cr dopings on the Mn site are expected to show interesting physical properties and should provide useful information for the understanding of the physical mechanisms in layered manganites.

Fig. 1.Structure of A2BO4 (K2NiF4-Type).

 

EXPERIMENTAL

The samples of La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.35Fe0.15O4 and La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.2Fe0.3O4 were synthesized by the following procedure. The powders of La2O3 (Aldrich 99.9%), MnO2 (Aldrich 99.9%), Cr2O3 (Aldrich 99.9%), Fe2O3 (Aldrich 99.9%) and SrCO3 (Aldrich 99.9%) were weighed in the ratios corresponding to the stoichiometry of the desired phases. Prior to use, La2O3 was heated at 1000 ℃ to remove moisture. The powders were mixed and homogenized by grinding with an alumina mortar and pestle. The mixtures were then pressed into pellets 10 mm in diameter and 1 mm thick by hydraulic press under 20 MPa, and then calcined at 1200 K in static air atmosphere in an electric tube furnace for about 36 hours. The calcined pellets were ground, and again pressed into pellets by hydraulic press under 20 MPa, and then calcined at 1563 K for about 72 hours in static air atmosphere with a number of intermediate grindings and pelletizings. The samples were then cooled down slowly to room temperature in the electric furnace.

Room temperature X-ray diffraction data of the phases were recorded on Bruker AXS diffractometer-D8 (D76181 Kurlsruhe, Germany) using CuKα radiations at a scanning speed of 1°/minute. The experimental XRD data are given in Tables 1 and 2, while the pattern is plotted in Fig. 2. The total amount of various constituent cations was estimated by Perkin Elmer atomic absorption spectrometer 700. The oxygen content in the samples was determined by modified iodometric technique within error limits of ±0.01. The samples were dissolved in concentrated HCl and the resulted chlorine was absorbed by a KI solution. The titration was made by using 0.005 N standard sodium thiosulphate solution. The details of the method have been described elsewhere.37 The precise chemical composition of the phases was determined to be La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.35Fe0.15O3.981 and La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.2Fe0.3O3.984.

The electrical resistivity of the sintered pellets of the phases was measured by four probe method in the temperature range 150-300 K. Thin copper wires were attached to the surface of pellets with silver paste for the purpose of electrodes. The magnetic susceptibility of the powdered samples was measured by Faraday magnetic balance under constant magnetic field of 3,700 gauss in the temperature range 100-300 K. The magnetic susceptibility of the samples was calculated after diamagnetic correction for the constituent ions in the phase.

Table 1.Powder X-ray diffraction data of La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.35Fe0.15O4(Space group: I4/mmm) [a=3.8679(3) A; c=12.6714(3) A]

Table 2.Powder X-ray diffraction data of La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.2Fe0.3O4 (Space group: I4/mmm)[a=3.8763(3) A; c=12.6737(3) A]

Fig. 2.X-ray diffraction patterns of La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.2Fe0.3O4 (I) and La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.35Fe0.15O4 (II).

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

All the peaks of X-ray diffraction pattern of polycrystalline samples were successfully indexed on the tetragonal unit cell in the space group I4/mmm. The unit cell parameters and space group were determined and tested by using program “Checkcell”38 and are listed in the Tables 1 and 2. The atomic positions of La/Sr, Mn/Cr/Fe and O for La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.35Fe0.15O4 and La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.2Fe0.3O4 have been estimated from analogy with Sr2VO4 without refinement.39 The theoretical diffraction intensities of the phases (Tables 1 and 2) were determined by using programs “Diamond” (Method of Klaus Brandenburg 1998) and “Mercury 2.3” based on the atomic positions, cell parameters and space group I4/mmm. The agreement between the experimental and theoretical intensities is in general satisfactory considering that atomic positions are not refined and that any preferred orientation effects are neglected. The XRD results confirmed the formation of RP type (n=1) La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.35Fe0.15O4 and La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.2Fe0.3O4 phases.

Analysis of the cell parameters shows that increase in iron content leads to slight increase in c parameter while the corresponding increase in a parameter is much larger. In particular a would be expected to be affected by the transition metal as the pervoskite slabs in the K2NiF4-type structure linked through corner sharing in the ab plane. The c axis, on the other hand, should be strongly dominated by the La/Sr-O bonds. The partial replacement of Cr3+ (ionic radius=0.62Å) by larger Fe3+ (ionic radius=0.65Å) might therefore be expected to increase cell parameter a more significantly than c.

The temperature dependence of electrical resistivity is given in Fig. 3, where log ρ is plotted against temperature (T). The plot shows that the temperature coefficient of resistivity of both the phases is negative suggesting that materials are insulators in the temperature range 150-300K. The insulator behavior in both the phases is attributed to the super exchange coupling of electrons. The similar results have also been reported earlier in such RP-type phases containing Mn, Fe and Cr ions at B site.40-42 The results suggest that the electrical resistivity increases with decreasing iron content, which could be attributed to enhancement of the 3D-character along c-axis because of the coming closer of (Mn/Cr/Fe)O2 and (La,Sr)O layers along the c-axis as a result of replacement of Fe3+ ion by smaller Cr3+ ion. Various equations based upon different mechanisms of conduction, such as those applicable in case of Arrhenius model, polaron hopping model and variable range hopping model have been applied to the data of electrical resistivity of the phases. It was observed that the equation based on variable range hopping mechanism defined by the relation, ρ=ρo exp(BT-1/4) was applicable to the data. The linearity of plot between log ρ and T-1/4 (Fig. 4) shows that the electrical conduction in these phases occurs by a 3D variable range hopping mechanism which is generally observed in such perovskite-related phases.30,42 The characteristic energy of hopping (B), calculated from the slopes of log ρ versus T-1/4 plots, is equal to 5.5 and 3.5 K-1/4 for La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.35Fe0.15O4 and La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.2Fe0.3O4, respectively. The comparatively large value of B for La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.35Fe0.15O4 phase suggests that insulator behavior is more pronounced in this phase.

Fig. 3.Plots of log ρ versus Temperature (K) for La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.2Fe0.3O4 (I) and La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.35Fe0.15O4 (II).

The temperature dependence of inverse molar magnetic susceptibility is shown in Fig. 5. Linearity of plots shows that the Curie-Weiss law is followed in the temperature range of investigation. The Weiss constant (θ) is negative for both the phases suggesting that magnetic interactions are antiferromagnetic. The values of effective magnetic moment (μeff) estimated from the slope of χm-1 versus T plot comes out to be 4.14 and 3.63 B. M. for La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.35Fe0.15O4 and La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.2Fe0.3O4, respectively. The theoretical spin only magnetic moment has been calculated from the relationship43

where μ1, μ2, μ3 and μ4 are the theoretical magnetic moments of high spin Mn3+, Mn4+, Cr3+, and Fe3+ ions and X1, X2, X3 and X4 are their relative molar fractions. The μcal values for La0.5Sr1.5 (Mn4+0.462Mn3+0.038)Cr0.35Fe0.15O3.981 and La0.5Sr1.5 (Mn4+0.468Mn3+0.032)Cr0.2Fe0.3O3.984 comes to be 4.28 and 4.61 B.M., respectively. The decrease in μeff value compared to spin only μcal value in both the phases is attributed to antiferromagnetic interactions. The similar results have also been reported earlier in such RP-type phases.8,40-42 Generally, the magnetic interaction between Cr3+ and Mn3+ is FM, and that between Cr3+ and Mn4+ is AFM.31,44 Furthermore, the Fe3+ ions do not participate in the double exchange interaction with the Mn4+ ions.33 Thus, the antiferromagnetic behaviour of the phases could be due to the antiferromagnetic interactions of the type Mn4+-O-Mn4+, Mn4+-O-Cr3+, Mn4+-O-Fe3+, Fe3+-O-Mn3+, Cr3+-O-Cr3+ and Fe3+-O-Fe3+. As the stoichiometry of the phases indicates the presences of some Mn3+ ions, there might be some ferromagnetic interactions of the type Mn3+-O-Mn4+ and Cr3+-O-Mn3+ but the antiferromagnetic interactions predominates over ferromagnetic interactions because of much higher concentration of Mn4+ compared to Mn3+ ions which results in the antiferromagnetic behaviour of the phases.

Fig. 4.Plots of log ρ versus T-1/4 for La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.2Fe0.3O4(I) and La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.35Fe0.15O4 (II).

Fig. 5.Plots of Inverse molar susceptibility (χm-1) versus Temperature (K) for La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.2Fe0.3O4 (I) and La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.35Fe0.15O4 (II).

 

CONCLUSIONS

The RP-type phases La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.35Fe0.15O4 and La0.5Sr1.5Mn0.5Cr0.2Fe0.3O4, prepared by ceramic method, crystallize with tetragonal unit cell in the space group I4/mmm. The increase in unit cell volume by the replacement of Cr by Fe is in accordance with ionic sizes of the two. The Weiss constant (θ) suggests that both phases are antiferromagnetic. The electrical conduction in both the phases occurs by variable range hopping mechanism.

참고문헌

  1. Moseley, P. T.; Williams, D. E. Polyhedron 1989, 9, 1615.
  2. Meixner, H.; Lampe, U. Sensors and Actuators B 1996, 33, 198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4005(96)80098-0
  3. Skinner, S. J.; Kilner, J. A. Solid. State. Ion. 2000, 135, 709. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00388-X
  4. Ormerod, R. M. Chem. Soc. Reviews 2003, 32, 17. https://doi.org/10.1039/b105764m
  5. Rao, C. N. R.; Ganguly, P.; Singh, K. K.; Mohan Ram, R. A. J. Solid. State. Chem. 1988, 72, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596(88)90003-5
  6. Sreedhar, K.; McElfresh, M.; Perry, D.; Kim, D.; Metcalf, P.; Honig, J. M. J. Solid. State. Chem. 1994, 110, 208. https://doi.org/10.1006/jssc.1994.1161
  7. Zhang. Z.; Greenblatt, M.; Goodenough, J. B. J. Solid. State. Chem. 1994, 108, 402. https://doi.org/10.1006/jssc.1994.1059
  8. Sharma, I. B.; Singh, D. Bull. Mater. Sci. 1998, 21, 363. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02744920
  9. Ruddlesden, S. N.; Popper, P. Acta. Crystallogr. 1957, 10, 538. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X57001929
  10. Ruddlesden, S. N.; Popper, P. Acta. Crystallogr. 1958, 11, 54. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X58000128
  11. Kakol, Z.; Spalek, J.; Honig, J. M. J. Solid. State. Chem. 1989, 79, 288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596(89)90277-6
  12. Kim, S. H.; Battle, P. D. J. Solid. State. Chem. 1994, 112, 262. https://doi.org/10.1006/jssc.1994.1302
  13. Sreedhar, K.; Honig, J. M. J. Solid. State. Chem. 1994, 111, 147. https://doi.org/10.1006/jssc.1994.1210
  14. Moritomo, Y.; Asamitsu, A.; Kuwahara, H.; Tokura, Y. Nature (London) 1996, 380, 141. https://doi.org/10.1038/380141a0
  15. Kimura, T.; Tomioka, Y.; Kuwahara, H.; Asamitsu, A.; Tamura, M.; Tokura, Y. Science 1996, 274, 1698. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5293.1698
  16. Kimura, T.; Tokura, Y. Annu. Mater. Sci. 2000, 30, 451. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.451
  17. Zener, C. Phy. Rev. 1951, 82, 403. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.82.403
  18. Dagotto, E.; Hotta, T.; Moreo, A. Phys. Rep. 2001, 344, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00121-6
  19. Zhang, J.; Wang, F.; Zhang, P.; Yan, Q. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 86, 1604. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.370933
  20. Zhu, H.; Xu, X. J.; Pi, L.; Zhang, Y. H. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 62, 6754. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.62.6754
  21. Zhu, H.; Xu, X. J.; Ruan, K. Q.; Zhang, Y. H. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 65, 104424. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.104424
  22. Wiegand, F.; Gold, S.; Schmid, A.; Geissier, J.; Goering, E. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 2035. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1506792
  23. Onose, Y.; He, J. P.; Kannko, Y.; Arima, T.; Tokura, Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 242502. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1947900
  24. Banerjee Sunil Nair, A. Phys. Rev. B. 2004, 70, 104428. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.70.104428
  25. Ang, R.; Lu, W. J.; Zhang, R. L.; Zhao, B. C.; Zhu, X. B.; Song, W. H.; Sun, Y. P. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 184417. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.184417
  26. Shannon, R. D. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 1976, 32, 75.
  27. Gundkaram, R.; Lin, J. G.; Lee, F. Y.; Tai, M. F.; Shen, C. H.; Huang, C. Y.; J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1999, 11, 5187. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/11/26/319
  28. Zhang, J.; Yan, Q.; Wang, F.; Yuan, P.; Zhang, P. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2000, 12, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/12/9/303
  29. Chashka, K. B.; Fisher, B.; Genossar, J.; Keren, A.; Patlagon, L.; Reisner, G. M.; Shimshoni, E.; Mitchell, J. F. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 65, 134441. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.134441
  30. Zhang, R. L.; Zhao, B. C.; Song, W. H.; Ma, Y. Q.; Yang, J.; Sheng, Z. G.; Dai, J. M. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 96, 4965. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1794907
  31. Matsukawa, M.; Chiba, M.; Kikuchi, E.; Suryanarayanan, R.; Apostu, M.; Nimori, S.; Sugimoto, K.; Kobayashi, N. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 224422. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.224422
  32. Chang, Y. L.; Huang, Q.; Ong, C. K. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 91, 789. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1421044
  33. Ahn, K. H.; Wu, X. W.; Liu, K.; Chien, C. I. Phy. Rev. B 1996, 54, 15299. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.15299
  34. Ahn, K. H.; Wu, X. W.; Liu, K.; Chien, C. I. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 81, 5505.
  35. Blanco, J. J.; Insausti, M.; Gil de Muro, I.; Lezama, L.; Rojo, T. J. Solid. State. Chem. 2006, 179, 623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2005.11.017
  36. Laiho, R.; Lisunov, K. G.; Lahderanta, E.; Salminen, J.; Zakhvalinskii, V. S. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2002, 250, 276.
  37. Krogh Anderson, I. G.; Krogh Anderson, E.; Norby, P.; Skou, E. J. Solid. State. Chem. 1994, 113, 320. https://doi.org/10.1006/jssc.1994.1377
  38. Laugier, J.; Bochu, B. Checkcell, programme developped dans Laboratoire des Materiaux et du Genie Physique, Ecole nationale Superieure de Physique de Grenoble (INPG) http://www.inpg.fr/LMGP.
  39. Rey, M. J.; Dehaudt, P.; Joubert, J. C.; Lambert-Andron, B.; Cyrot. M.; Cyrot-Lackmann, F. J. Solid. State. Chem. 1990, 86, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596(90)90119-I
  40. Sharma, I. B.; Singh, D. Ind. J. Chem. 1997, 36A, 80.
  41. Sharma, I. B.; Magotra, S. K.; Singh, D.; Batra, S.; Mudher, K. D. S. J. Alloys Compds. 1999, 291, 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(99)00257-1
  42. Singh, D.; Singh, R. J. Chem. Sci. 2010, 122, 807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12039-010-0068-x
  43. Porta, P.; Minelli, G.; Botton, I. L.; Baran, E. J. J. Solid State Chem. 1991, 92, 202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596(91)90257-I
  44. Goodenough, J. B. Magnetism and the Chemical Bond, Interscience; New York, 1963.