DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Employers' Perceptions of Intimate Partner Violence among a Diverse Workforce

  • Samuel, Laura J. (School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University) ;
  • Tudor, Carrie (School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University) ;
  • Weinstein, Marc (College of Education, Florida International University) ;
  • Moss, Helen (Labor Education and Research Center, University of Oregon) ;
  • Glass, Nancy (School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University)
  • Received : 2011.04.01
  • Accepted : 2011.06.24
  • Published : 2011.09.30

Abstract

Objectives: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant global public health concern, affecting 5.3 million US individuals annually. An estimated 1 in 3 women globally are abused by an intimate partner in their lifetime, and the effects carry over into the workplace. This article examines employers' perceptions of IPV in the workplace, targeting supervisors of Latina employees. Methods: Fourteen employers and supervisors of small service-sector companies in Oregon were interviewed using semi-structured interviews. Interpretive description was used to identify themes. These qualitative interviews preceded and helped to formulate a larger workplace intervention study. Results: The following themes were found and are detailed: (1) factors associated with recognizing IPV in the workplace, (2) effects of IPV on the work environment and (3) supervisors' responses to IPV-active vs. passive involvement. Also, supervisors' suggestions for addressing IPV in the workplace are summarized. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the need for more IPV-related resources in the workplace to be available to supervisors as well as survivors and their coworkers. The needs of supervisors and workplaces vary by site, demonstrating the need for tailored interventions, and culturally appropriate workplace interventions are needed for Latinas and other racially and ethnically diverse populations.

Keywords

References

  1. Saltzman LE, Fanslow JL, McMahon PM, Shelley GA. Intimate partner violence surveillance: uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2002.
  2. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Costs of intimate partner violence against women in the United States. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2003.
  3. World Health Organisation. World report on violence and health. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organisation; 2002.
  4. Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HAFM, Ellsberg M. Heise L, Watts C. WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women: initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women's responses. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2005.
  5. Tjaden PG, Thoennes N. Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: findngs from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice; 2000. Report No.: NCJ 183781. Grant No.: NIJ 93-IJ-CX-0012. 71 p.
  6. Understanding intimate partner violence: Fact sheet. [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2006 [cited 2009 Apr 22]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/IPV-FactSheet.pdf.
  7. Swanberg JE, Logan T, Macke C. Intimate partner violence, employment, and the workplace: consequences and future directions. Trauma Violence Abuse 2005;6:286-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838005280506
  8. Collins KS, Schoen C, Joseph S, Duchon L, Simantov E, Yellowitz M. Health concerns across a woman's lifespan: The commonwealth fund 1998 survey of women's health. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 1999.
  9. Reeves C, O'Leary-Kelly AM. The effects and costs of intimate partner violence for work organizations. J Interpers Violence 2007;22:327-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506295382
  10. Swanberg JE, Logan TK. Domestic violence and employment: a qualitative study. J Occup Health Psychol 2005;10:3-17. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.10.1.3
  11. Swanberg JE, Macke C. Intimate partner violence and the workplace: consequences and disclosure. Affilia 2006;21:391-406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109906292133
  12. Swanberg JE, Macke C, Logan TK. Intimate partner violence, women, and work: coping on the job. Violence Vict 2006;21:561-78. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.21.5.561
  13. Liz Claibone, Inc, Corporate Alliance to End Partner Violence, Safe Horizon. Corporate Leaders and America's Workforce on Domestic Violence: Summary Findings [Internet]. Bloomington (IL): Corporate Alliance to End Partner Violence. 2007 [cited 2009 Apr 29]. Available from: http://www.ncdsv.org/images/Corporate%20Leaders%20and%20America%27s%20Workforce%20on%20DV%20Summary_9-25-07.pdf.
  14. Klevens J. An overview of intimate partner violence among Latinos. Violence Against Women 2007;13:111-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206296979
  15. Caetano R, Field CA, Ramisetty-Mikler S, McGrath C. The 5-year course of intimate partner violence among White, Black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. J Interpers Violence 2005;20:1039-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505277783
  16. Ingram EM. A comparison of help seeking between Latino and non-Latino victims of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women 2007;13:159-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206296981
  17. Tjaden PG, Thoennes N. Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice; 2000. Report No.: NCJ 181867. Grant No.: NIJ 93-IJCX-0012. 62 p.
  18. Orloff LE, Jang D, Klein CF. With no place to turn: improving legal advocacy for battered immigrant women. Fam LQ 1995;29:313-29.
  19. Bloom T, Wagman J, Hernandez R, Yragui N, Hernandez-Valdovinos N, Dahlstrom M, Glass N. Partnering with community-based organizations to reduce intimate partner violence. Hisp J Behav Sci 2009;31:244-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986309333291
  20. Glass N, Bloom T, Perrin N, Anger WK. A computer-based training intervention for work supervisors to respond to intimate partner violence. Saf Health Work 2010;1:167-74. https://doi.org/10.5491/SHAW.2010.1.2.167
  21. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2002.
  22. Richards L, Morse JM. Read me first for a user's guide to qualitative methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2007.
  23. Thorne S, Kirkham SR, MacDonald-Emes J. Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Res Nurs Health 1997;20:169-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199704)20:2<169::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-I
  24. NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software [Computer software]. Version 8. Cambridge (MA): 2008.
  25. Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2007.
  26. Staggs SL, Long SM, Mason GE, Krishnan S, Riger S. Intimate partner violence, social support, and employment in the post-welfare reform era. J Interpers Violence 2007;22:345-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506295388
  27. Swanberg J, Macke C, Logan TK. Working women making it work: intimate partner violence, employment, and workplace support. J Interpers Violence 2007;22:292-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506295387
  28. Lynch SM, Graham-Bermann SA. Exploring the relationship between positive work experiences and women's sense of self in the context of partner abuse. Psychol Women Q 2004;28:159-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00132.x
  29. Rothman EF, Hathaway J, Stidsen A, de Vries HF. How employment helps female victims of intimate partner violence: a qualitative study. J Occup Health Psychol 2007;12:136-43. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.2.136
  30. Benson ML, Fox GL. Concentrated disadvantage, economic distress, and violence against women in intimate relationships. Rockville (MD): United States Department of Justice; 2004.
  31. Lipsky S, Caetano R, Field CA, Larkin GL. The role of intimate partner violence, race, and ethnicity in help-seeking behaviors. Ethn Health 2006;11:81-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557850500391410
  32. Adames SB, Campbell R. Immigrant Latinas' conceptualizations of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women 2005;11:1341-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801205280191
  33. Klevens J, Shelley G, Clavel-Arcas C, Barney DD, Tobar C, Duran ES, Barajas-Mazaheri R, Esparza J. Latinos' perspectives and experiences with intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women 2007;13:141-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206296980
  34. Logan TK, Shannon L, Cole J, Swanberg J. Partner stalking and implications for women's employment. J Interpers Violence 2007;22:268-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506295380
  35. Pollack KM, Austin W, Grisso JA. Employee assistance programs: a workplace resource to address intimate partner violence. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010;19:729-33. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2009.1495

Cited by

  1. Work-Related Intimate Partner Violence, Acculturation, and Socioeconomic Status Among Employed Mexican Men Enrolled in Batterer Intervention Programs vol.21, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215592719
  2. Workplace domestic violence leave laws: implementation, use, implications vol.8, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-03-2014-0006
  3. How Has Living with Intimate Partner Violence Affected the Work Situation? A Qualitative Study among Abused Women in Norway vol.31, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9806-2
  4. The role of trade unions in supporting victims of domestic violence in the workplace vol.49, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12204