DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Protective effects and immunogenicity of Salmonella Enteritidis killed vaccine strains selected from virulent Salmonella Enteritidis isolates

Salmonella Enteritidis 분리주에서의 선발된 불활화 백신균주의 방어효과 및 면역원성

  • Kang, Zheng-Wu (College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Won, Ho-Keun (ChoongAng Vaccine Laboratories) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Hee (ChoongAng Vaccine Laboratories) ;
  • Noh, Yun-Hee (ChoongAng Vaccine Laboratories) ;
  • Choi, Hwan-Won (ChoongAng Vaccine Laboratories) ;
  • Hahn, Tae-Wook (College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University)
  • Accepted : 2010.12.27
  • Published : 2011.03.30

Abstract

Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) has been a major causative agent of food-borne human disease due to consumption of contaminated eggs and poultry meat. To prevent SE infection in poultry, and therefore minimize human infections, vaccination with either killed or live SE vaccine is suggested. We evaluated a newly developed killed bacterin using a representative SE isolate in Korea. Among pool of SE isolates, two highly virulent isolates (the one isolate from chicken, the other from human) were selected by measuring mortality in mouse and chickens administered. The chickens were injected intramuscularly with killed vaccine and were challenged with highly virulent SE strain 3 week after vaccination. The recovered colony count (cfu/g) of spleen and cecal content in the vaccinated groups was reduced compared with those of the unvaccinated control group. The antibody level in the vaccinated groups was higher at 3 week post vaccination. These results indicate that vaccination with killed vaccine was effective in preventing the infection of virulent SE. Further study for a large number of layers should be needed for the effect of egg production, SE shedding in feces, persistence of antibody level.

Keywords

References

  1. 김상윤, 이회무, 김신, 홍현표, 권헌일. 경북지역 가축에서 분리된 Salmonella typhimurium과 S enteritidis의 phage typing 및 pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. 한국가축위생학회지 2001, 24, 243-253.
  2. 김정우. Salmonella enteritidis의 편모항원에 대한 난황항체의 생산. 한국가금학회지 1998, 25, 161-167.
  3. 박석기, 김무상, 이영기. 최근 5년간 서울시내 식중독 환자에서 분리한 Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis의 항생제 감수성 및 다제 내성 특성. 한국식품위생안전성학회지 2006, 21, 23-30.
  4. 이승배. ELISA 방법으로 계란의 난황에 존재하는 Salmonella enteritidis와 S. typhimurium에 대한 IgY 측정. 한국축산식품학회지 2003, 23, 161-167.
  5. 이희수, 임숙경, 조윤상, 주이석, 김재학, 김종만. 살모넬라 세포외막단백질 혼합백신을 이용한 돼지 및 닭에서의 살모넬라균감염증 방어효과. 대한수의학회지 2007, 47, 147-155.
  6. 최철순. 백신의 개량과 생명공학. 유전공학연구논집 1994, 7, 55-82.
  7. Angulo FJ, Swerdlow DL. Salmonella enteritidis infections in the United States. J AM Vet Med Assoc 1998, 213, 1729-1731.
  8. Barbezange C, Ermel G, Ragimbeau C, Humbert F, Salvat G. Some safety aspects of Salmonella vaccines for poultry: in vivo study of the genetic stability of three Salmonella typhimurium live vaccines. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2000, 192, 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09366.x
  9. Barbour EK, Frerichs WM, Nabbut NH, Poss PE, Brinton MK. Evaluation of bacterins containing three predominant phage types of Salmonella enteritidis for prevention of infection in egg-laying chickens. Am J Vet Res 1993, 54, 1306-1309.
  10. Barrow PA. Experimental infection of chickens with Salmonella enteritidis. Avian Pathol 1991, 20, 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079459108418749
  11. Clifton-Hadley FA, Breslin M, Venables LM, Sprigings KA, Cooles SW, Houghton S, Woodward MJ. A laboratory study of an inactivated bivalent iron restricted Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium dual vaccine against Typhimurium challenge in chickens. Vet Microbiol 2002, 89, 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00169-4
  12. Cooper GL, Nicholas RAJ, Cullen GA, Hormaeche CE. Vaccination of chickens with a Salmonella enteritidis aroA live oral Salmonella vaccine. Microb Pathog 1990, 9, 255-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0882-4010(90)90014-H
  13. Dhillon AS, Alisantosa B, Shivaprasad HL, Jack O, Schaberg D, Bandli D. Pathogenicity of Salmonella enteritidis phage types 4, 8, and 23 in broiler chicks. Avian Dis 1999, 43, 506-515. https://doi.org/10.2307/1592649
  14. Freitas Neto OC, Mesquita AL, Paiva JB, Zotesso F, Junior AB. Control of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis in laying hens by inactivated Salmonella Enteritidis vaccines. Braz J Microbiol 2008, 39, 390-396. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822008000200034
  15. Garmory HS, Brown KA, Titball RW. Salmonella vaccines for use in humans: present and future perspectives. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2002, 26, 339-353.
  16. Gast RK, Holt PS. Experimental horizontal transmission of Salmonella enteritidis strains (phage types 4, 8, and 13a) in chicks. Avian Dis 1999, 43, 774-778. https://doi.org/10.2307/1592747
  17. Gast RK, Holt PS. Deposition of phage type 4 and 13a Salmonella enteritidis strains in the yolk and albumen of eggs laid by experimentally infected hens. Avian Dis 2000, 44, 706-710. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593116
  18. Gast RK, Stone HD, Holt PS. Evaluation of the efficacy of oil-emulsion bacterins for reducing fecal shedding of Salmonella enteritidis by laying hens. Avian Dis 1993, 37, 1085-1091. https://doi.org/10.2307/1591918
  19. Kang ZW, Jung JH, Kim SH, Lee BK, Lee DY, Kim YJ, Lee JY, Won HK, Kim EH, Hahn TW. Genotypic and phenotypic diversity of Salmonella Enteritidis isolated from chickens and humans in Korea. J Vet Med Sci 2009, 71, 1433-1438. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.001433
  20. Lillehoj HS. Cell-mediated immunity in parasitic and bacterial diseases. In: Sharma JM (ed.). Avian Cellular Immunology. pp. 155-181, CRC, Boca Raton, 1990.
  21. Linton AH. Guidelines on Prevention and Control of Salmonellosis. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1983.
  22. Lu S, Manges AR, Xu Y, Fang FC, Riley LW. Analysis of virulence of clinical isolates of Salmonella enteritidis in vivo and in vitro. Infect Immun 1999, 67, 5651-5657.
  23. Meenakshi M, Bakshi CS, Butchaiah G, Bansal MP, Siddiqui MZ, Singh VP. Adjuvanted outer membrane protein vaccine protects poultry against infection with Salmonella enteritidis. Vet Res Commun 1999, 23, 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006250301254
  24. Muotiala A, Hovi M, Makela PH. Protective immunity in mouse salmonellosis: Comparison of smooth and rough live and killed vaccine. Microb Pathog 1989, 6, 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0882-4010(89)90007-7
  25. Nicholas RAJ, Andrews SJ. Detection of antibody to Salmonella enteritidis and S typhimurium in the yolk of hen's eggs. Vet Rec 1991, 128, 98-100. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.128.5.98
  26. Olsen JE, Tiainen T, Brown DJ. Levels of virulence are not determined by genomic lineage of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis strains. Epidemiol Infect 1999, 123, 423-430. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268899003155
  27. Poppe C, Demczuk W, McFadden K, Johnson RP. Virulence of Salmonella enteritidis phagetypes 4, 8 and 13 and other Salmonella spp. for day-old chicks, hens and mice. Can J Vet Res 1993, 57, 281-287.
  28. Young SD, Olusanya O, Jones KH, Liu T, Liljebjelke KA, Hofacre CL. Salmonella incidence in broilers from breeders vaccinated with live and killed Salmonella. J Appl Poult Res 2007, 16, 521-528. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2007-00009