수산해양교육연구 (Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education)

  • 제23권4호
  • /
  • Pages.673-683
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1229-8999(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-2049(eISSN)
한국수산해양교육학회 (The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education)
권호 표지

교원능력개발평가 제도의 타당성 분석

An Analysis of Validity of Teacher Evaluation Policy

  • 투고 : 2011.10.05
  • 심사 : 2011.11.28
  • 발행 : 2011.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study was to analyze the validity of teacher evaluation policy for professional development and to suggest the ways to improve the policy in school. The teacher evaluation policy for professional development is designed to improve teacher professionalism and quality of school education. For this purpose, A survey was conducted and 361 elementary and middle school teachers participated in Busan. Collected data were analyzed using SPSS WIN 12.0. The conclusions of this study are as follows: First, although teachers are highly interested in the teacher evaluation policy, they have negative attitudes for practicing the new policy. Second, assessors must be composed of reliable, competent experts because teacher evaluation has a great influence on teaching activities. The assessors should be composed of those who have the specialization and reliability on the basis. Also the assessors must be trained to enhance the fairness, objectivity and reliability by rigid discipline. Finally, teacher evaluation policy should be closely linked to increasing teacher's expertise such as training opportunities, teacher consultants, and senior teacher systems and should be widely utilized for the evaluation to be effective.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김갑성(2008). 2008년 교원능력개발평가 선도학교 운영 결과 분석 연구, 한국교육개발원.
  2. 김갑성(2009). 2009년 하반기 교원능력개발평가운영 결과, 교육개발원
  3. 김달효(2009). 교원평가의 주체 및 영역에 대한 초중등학교 교원들의 인식, 수산해양교육연구 21(4), 508-522.
  4. 김명수(2010). 열린 교육현장 순회토론회: 교원능력개발평가제도의 현장 적합성과 현장 적용 방안, 한국교육개발원.
  5. 김이경. 유균상. 이태상. 박상완. 정금현 (2004). 교사평가시스템 연구, 서울 : 한국교육개발원
  6. 김이경 외(2009). 2009 교원능력개발평가 선도학교운영결과 분석 및 모형 개선, 인천광역시교육청.교육과학기술부.
  7. 김이경(2010). 교원능력개발평가 개선을 위한 전문가 토론회: 교원능력개발평가 실행 쟁점 및 개선 방향, 한국교육개발원.
  8. 김종한(1998). 고등학생의 교사수업평가에 관한 연구, 충남대 대학원 박사학위논문.
  9. 배호순(1991). 수업평가-수업 효과 증대를 위한 평가적 접근, 서울: 양서원.
  10. 서범종. 전제상. 이지혜. 이혜정(2011). 전국 및 시.도별 2010년 교원능력개발평가 성과 분석 및 시행철자.모형 개선 연구, 한국지방교육연구센터.
  11. 성병창(2007). 초임교사 교직 적응을 위한 지원 방안, 수산해양교육연구 19(2), 310-322.
  12. 원효헌. 설현수(2000). 학생에 의한 교사 교수활동 평가도구의 양호도 분석, 교육평가연구 13(2), 55-76.
  13. 정지곤(2006). 한국에서의 교원교육의 새로운 도전과 과제-교장임용제도와 교원양성제도를 중심으로-, 경인교육대학교 60주년 국제 세미나 자료집.
  14. 한국교육과정평가원(2009). 교원능력개발제 실시에 따른 수업능력개발 요구 교사의 전문성 신장 방안, 한국교육과정평가원.
  15. Airasian, P.W. & Gullickson, A.(1994) Examination of teacher self-assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8(2), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00972263
  16. Braskamp, L. A. et al.(1984). Evaluating teaching effectiveness: a practical guide, Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
  17. Castetter, William B.(1986). The personnel function in educational administration(4th ed.), NY: Macmillan Pub. Co.
  18. Duke, D. L. & Stiggins, R.(1990). Beyond minimum competence: evaluation for professional development, In J. Millman, & L. D. Hammond(Eds.) The new handbook of teacher evaluation, California: SAGE. 116-136.
  19. Dunkin, M. J.(1986). Research on teaching in higher education, In M. C. Wittrock(3ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, NY: Macmillan.
  20. Egelson, P.(1993). Designing teacher evaluation systems that support professional growth, ERIC ED 376583.
  21. Hammond, L. D.(1990). Teacher evaluation in transition: Emerging roles and evolving methods, In J. Millman & L. D. Hammond(Eds.) The new handbook of teacher evaluation, California: SAGE Publications.
  22. Iwanicki, Edward F.(1990). Teacher evaluaton for school improvement. In J. Millman, & L. D. Hammond(Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation, California: SAGE, 158-171.
  23. Manatt, R. P.(1988). Teacher performance evaluation: A total systems approach. In W. J. Popham, S. J. Stanley(Eds), Teacher evaluation: Six prescriptions for success, ASCD.
  24. Ondrack, D. A. & Oliver, C.(1986). A review and analysis of performance appraisal processes volume I : A review of the literature, Toronto: The O.I.S.E. press.
  25. Stodolsky, S. S.(1990). Classroom observation. In Linda Darling-Hammond(ed.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: assessing elementary and secondary school teacher, London: SAGE Pub. 175-190.
  26. The Joint Committee(1994). The Program Evaluation Standards(2nd), Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
  27. Yarbrough, D. B., Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Caruthers, F. A.(2010). The Program Evaluation Standards: A Guide for Evaluators and Evaluation Users. 3rd. eds, CA: Sage Publication.