Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (대한소아청소년정신의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Discriminant Validity of the CBCL 1.5-5 in Diagnosis of Developmental Delayed Infants

발달지체 진단에서 CBCL 1.5-5 유아행동평가척도-부모용의 변별력

  • Ha, Eun-Hye (Department of Child Welfare and Studies, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Kim, Seo-Yun (Department of Child Welfare and Studies, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Song, Dong-Ho (Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kwak, Eun-Hee (Dep. of Rehab. Psychology Yonsei University Medical Center) ;
  • Eom, So-Yong (Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 하은혜 (숙명여자대학교 아동복지학과) ;
  • 김서윤 (숙명여자대학교 아동복지학과) ;
  • 송동호 (연세대학교 의과대학 정신과학교실) ;
  • 곽은희 (연세의료원 재활심리실) ;
  • 엄소용 (연세대학교 의과대학 정신과학교실)
  • Received : 2010.05.12
  • Accepted : 2011.06.09
  • Published : 2011.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives:The purpose of this study was to verify discriminant validity and the clinical cutoff score of Child Behavior Checklist 1.5-5 in the diagnosis of developmental delayed infants. Methods:The participants were screened by Denver II which includes 156 developmental delayed infants and 288 normal infants. Chi-squared test, t-test, ROC curve analysis, odds ratio analysis were performed on the data. Results:Only 47 items out of 99 items among the CBCL 1.5-5 of total groups, 36 items of boys and 48 items of girls, discriminated developmental delayed infants well. Discriminant validity was confirmed by mean differences on the subscales of Withdrawn, Sleep Problems, Attention Problems, Internalizing Problems, Externalizing Problems, Total Problems, DSM Pervasive Developmental Problems and DSM Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Problems between the two groups. Additionally, ROC analyses demonstrated that Withdrawn, Attention Problems, Internalizing Problems, Total Behavior Problems and DSM Pervasive Developmental Problems significantly predicted developmental delayed infants compared to normal infants. Also, the clinical cutoff score criteria adopted in the Korean CBCL 1.5-5 for subscales of Withdrawn, Attention Problems, Internalizing Problems, Total Behavior Problems and DSM Pervasive Developmental Problems were shown to be valid. Conclusion:The subscales of Withdrawn, Attention Problems, Internalising Problems, Total Behavior Problems and DSM Pervasive Developmental Problems significantly discriminated in the diagnosis of developmental delayed infants well.

Keywords

References

  1. Ha EH. Developmental test and Intelligence Test. In: Park YS, editor. Handbook of Psychological Assessment for Child, Adolescent, and Adult. Seoul: Hana Medical Press;2010.
  2. Oh KJ, Lee HL, Hong KE, Ha EH. Korean version of Child Behavior Checklist (K-CBCL). Seoul: ChungAng Aptitude Publishing; 1997.
  3. Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. Manual for the ASEBA Preschool Forms & Profiles. Burington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families;2000.
  4. Oh KJ, Kim YA. Korean version of the child behavior checklist for ages 1.5-5. Seoul: Huno Consulting;2009.
  5. Pandolfi V, Magyar CI, Dill CA. Confirmatory factor analysis of the child behavior checklist 1.5-5 in a sample of children with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Developmental Disorders 2009;39;986-995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0716-5
  6. Lee J, Kim YA, Oh KJ. Discriminant validity and clinical utility of the Korean version of the Child Behavior Checklist for ages 1.5-5. Korean J Clin Psychol 2009;28;171-186. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2009.28.1.010
  7. Ha EH. Discriminant validity of the CBCL 1.5-5 in the screening of developmental delayed infants. Korean J Clin Psychol 2011;30; 137-158. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2011.30.1.008
  8. Shin HS, Han KJ, Oh KS, Oh JJ, Ha Mn. Manual for the Korean version of Denver II. Seoul: Hyunmoon;2002.
  9. Kim TL, Park RG. Manual for the Childhood Autism Rating Scale: CARS. Seoul: Special Education;1996.
  10. Frankenburg WK, Dodds JB. The Denver Developmental Screening Test. J Pediatrics 1967;71;181-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(67)80070-2
  11. Frankenburg WK, Dodds JB, Archer P, Shapiro H, Bresnick B. The Denver. II: A major revision and restandardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test II. Pediatrics 1992;89;91-97.
  12. Oh KS. An exploratory study for standardization of Denver Developmental Screening Test in Korea. J Nurs Sci 1976;1;93-116.
  13. Lee K. Denver II developmental screening test and development of Seoul children. Korean J Pediatrics 1996;39;1210-1215.
  14. Schopler E, Reichler RJ, Renner BR. Childhood Autism Rating Scale. North Carolina: TEACCH;1988.
  15. Shin MS, Kim YH. Standardization study for Korean version of Childhood Autism Rating Scale: reliability, validity and cut-off score. Korean J Clin Psychol 1998;17;1-15. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1998.17.1.1
  16. Luoto M, Hjort J. Evaluation of current statistical approaches for predictive geomorphological mapping. Geomorphology 2005;67; 299-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.10.006

Cited by

  1. Discriminant Validity of the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5-5 in Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder vol.26, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.2015.26.1.30