DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical Study of Natural Recovery of Altered Sensation after Minor Dental Surgery

  • Kim, Jong-Hwa (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Yun, Pil-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • Received : 2011.03.22
  • Accepted : 2011.05.09
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of our study was to evaluate natural recovery of neurologic injury after minor dental surgery based on subjective neurologic evaluation. Materials and Methods: From December 2005 through July 2009, 30 patients from Seoul National University Bundang Hospital were identified as having been treated with minor dental surgery. The patients were composed of 12 men and 18 women, with a mean age of 50.6 years. The median duration of this study was 62 weeks. Results: The patients were treated by implants (17 cases), tooth extractions (6 cases), bone grafts (4 cases), inferior alveolar nerve transpositions (2 cases) and periodontal surgery (1 case) prior to the occurrence of altered sensation. Areas of altered sensation after minor surgery included the lip (36.7%), chin (30.0%) and tooth (21.7%), and at final follow-up, there was no change of ranking. Altered sensations expressed by patients included numbness (33.3%), discomfort (22.9%), relieving sense (14.6%), tingling (14.6%) and itching (14.6%). There was no change of ranking of altered sensation at the last follow-up. Patients experienced the altered sensation always (47.8%), during tactile stimulation (26.1%), when chewing food (13.0%), and talking (13.0%). Mean visual analogue scale (VAS) was $3.43{\pm}2.84$ for pain and $6.64{\pm}2.72$ for paresthesia. VAS of pain was decreased significantly between the first visit and the end of follow-up, and paresthesia also showed a significant difference. Conclusion: Altered sensations may occur at any time after minor dental surgery, but we observed that natural recovery of altered sensation occurred as time went on.

Keywords

References

  1. Phillips C, Essick G, Zuniga J, Tucker M, Blakey G 3rd. Qualitative descriptors used by patients following orthognathic surgery to portray altered sensation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64: 1751-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.100
  2. Phillips C, Essick G, Blakey G 3rd, Tucker M. Relationship between patients' perceptions of postsurgical sequelae and altered sensations after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65: 597-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.078
  3. Essick GK, Phillips C, Turvey TA, Tucker M. Facial altered sensation and sensory impairment after orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36: 577-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.02.006
  4. Tay AB, Zuniga JR. Clinical characteristics of trigeminal nerve injury referrals to a university centre. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36: 922-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.03.012
  5. Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990; 28: 20-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(90)90005-6
  6. Renton T. Prevention of iatrogenic inferior alveolar nerve injuries in relation to dental procedures. Dent Update. 2010; 37: 350-2, 354-6, 358-60 passim. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2010.37.6.350
  7. van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, Folmer T, Henry P, Herrmann I, Higuchi K, Laney W, Linden U, Astrand P. Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; 5: 272-81.
  8. Seo K, Tanaka Y, Terumitsu M, Someya G. Characterization of different paresthesias following orthognathic surgery of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63: 298-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.07.015
  9. Sisk AL, Hammer WB, Shelton DW, Joy ED Jr. Complications following removal of impacted third molars: the role of the experience of the surgeon. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986; 44: 855-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(86)90221-1
  10. Lopes V, Mumenya R, Feinmann C, Harris M. Third molar surgery: an audit of the indications for surgery, post-operative complaints and patient satisfaction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995; 33: 33-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(95)90083-7
  11. Chiapasco M, De Cicco L, Marrone G. Side effects and complications associated with third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993; 76: 412-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(93)90005-O
  12. Middlehurst RJ, Barker GR, Rood JP. Postoperative morbidity with mandibular third molar surgery: a comparison of two techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988; 46: 474-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(88)90415-6
  13. Robinson PP, Smith KG. Lingual nerve damage during lower third molar removal: a comparison of two surgical methods. Br Dent J. 1996; 180: 456-61. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809126
  14. Tay AB, Go WS. Effect of exposed inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle during surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62: 592-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2003.08.033
  15. Blondeau F, Daniel NG. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007; 73: 325.
  16. Ellies LG. Altered sensation following mandibular implant surgery: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68: 664-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90384-M
  17. Garisto GA, Gaffen AS, Lawrence HP, Tenenbaum HC, Haas DA. Occurrence of paresthesia after dental local anesthetic administration in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010; 141: 836-44. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0281
  18. Queral-Godoy E, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Frequency and evolution of lingual nerve lesions following lower third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64: 402-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.010
  19. Smith MH, Lung KE. Nerve injuries after dental injection: a review of the literature. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006; 72: 559-64.
  20. Hillerup S, Jensen R. Nerve injury caused by mandibular block analgesia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 35: 437-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2005.10.004
  21. Hirsch JM, Brånemark PI. Fixture stability and nerve function after transposition and lateralization of the inferior alveolar nerve and fixture installation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995; 33: 276-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(95)90037-3
  22. Alling CC 3rd. Dysesthesia of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986; 44: 454-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(86)80010-6
  23. Moore PA, Haas DA. Paresthesias in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2010; 54: 715-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2010.06.016
  24. Flanagan D. Delayed onset of altered sensation following dental implant placement and mental block local anesthesia: a case report. Implant Dent. 2002; 11: 324-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200211040-00010
  25. Kwon TG, Kim SY, Kim JB. The prevalence of sensory disturbance after implant surgery-retrospective survey of implant practitioners. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 30: 339-44.
  26. Ryu JW, Kwon JS. Dysesthesia after tooth extraction and implant surgery reported by dentists. Korean J Oral Med. 2007; 32: 263-72.
  27. Ellies LG, Hawker PB. The prevalence of altered sensation associated with implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993; 8: 674-9.
  28. Nakagawa K, Ueki K, Matsumoto N, Takatsuka S, Yamamoto E, Ooe H. The assessment of trigeminal sensory nerve paraesthesia after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: modified somatosensory evoked potentials recording method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1997; 25: 97-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(97)80052-2