Plant Biotechnology Reports

  • 제5권4호
  • /
  • Pages.345-352
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1863-5466(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1863-5474(eISSN)
한국식물생명공학회 (The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the rheological and diffusion properties of some gelling agents and blends and their effects on shoot multiplication

  • Dobranszki, Judit (Research Institute of Nyiregyhaza, Research Institutes and Study Farm, Centre for Agricultural and Applied Economic Sciences, University of Debrecen) ;
  • Magyar-Tabori, Katalin (Research Institute of Nyiregyhaza, Research Institutes and Study Farm, Centre for Agricultural and Applied Economic Sciences, University of Debrecen) ;
  • Tombacz, Etelka (Aqueous Colloids Group, Department of Physical Chemistry and Material Science, University of Szeged)
  • 투고 : 2011.05.03
  • 심사 : 2011.06.13
  • 발행 : 2011.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The rheological and diffusion properties of blends of agar/guar gum, agar/Phytagel and Phytagel/guar gum were analysed and compared to those properties of agar or Phytagel applied alone at two different gelling concentrations. Moreover, their effects on the shoot multiplication of the apple scion Galaxy and two black locust clones (SF63, SF82) were studied, and their cost benefits over agar were calculated. Elastic hydrogel formation was demonstrated for each blend by rheological measurements, but the gel strength depended on the types and concentrations of the applied gelling agents and blends. Guar gum was able to speed the diffusion in the different blends, and diffusion was independent of gel strength. The rate of shoot multiplication increased (to 8.9 shoots per explant) and the percent of hyperhydrated shoots decreased (to 12%) when the blend of agar/guar gum was used for the shoot multiplication of apple. Similarly, the highest multiplication rates of black locust clones (between 3.9 and 4.1) were obtained on media solidified by blends containing guar gum. The best shoot performance with the lowest percent of hyperhydrated shoots (11-12% in SF63 and 2-23% in SF82) was achieved using agar alone or the agar/guar gum blend. The shoot multiplication was improved of both species and the production cost was reduced by 42% by using the agar/guar gum blend.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Agrawal A, Sanayaima R, Tandon R, Tyagi RK (2010) Cost-effective in vitro conservation of banana using alternatives of gelling agent (isabgol) and carbon source (market sugar). Acta Physiol Plant 32:703-711 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-009-0450-9
  2. Anagnostakis SL (1974) Haploid plants from anthers of tobacco-enhancement with charcoal. Planta 15:281-283
  3. Babbar SB, Jain N (1998) Isubgol as an alternative gelling agent in plant tissue culture media. Plant Cell Rep 17:318-322 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050400
  4. Babbar SB, Jain R (2006) Xanthan gum: an economical partial substitute for agar in microbial culture media. Curr. Microbiol. 52:287-292 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-005-0225-5
  5. Babbar SB, Jain R, Walia N (2005) Guar gum as a gelling agent for plant tissue culture media. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 41:258-261
  6. Banik RM, Kanari B, Upadhyay SN (2000) Exopolysaccharide of the gellan family: prospects and potential. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 16:407-414 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008951706621
  7. Beruto D, Beruto M, Ciccarelli C, Debergh P (1995) Matric potential evaluations and measurements for gelled substrates. Physiol Plant 94:151-157 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1995.tb00796.x
  8. Bhattacharya P, Dey S, Bhattacharyya BC (1994) Use of low-cost gelling agents and support matrices for industrial scale plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 37:15-23 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048112
  9. Debergh PC (1983) Effects of agar brand and concentration on the tissue culture media. Physiol Plant 59:270-276 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1983.tb00770.x
  10. Fira A, Clapa D, Plopa C (2010) New aspects regarding the micropropagation of blackberry cultivar 'thornless evergreen'. Bull UASVM Hortic 67:106-114
  11. Henderson WE, Kinnersley AM (1988) Corn starch as an alternative gelling agent for plant tissue culture. Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult 15:17-22 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039885
  12. Ivanova M, van Staden J (2011) Influence of gelling agent and cytokinins on the control of hyperhidricity in Aloe polyphylla. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 104:13-21 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9794-5
  13. Jain N, Babbar SB (2002) Gum katira-a cheap gelling agent for plant tissue culture media. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 71:223-229 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020379024347
  14. Jain R, Anjaiah V, Babbar SB (2005) Guar gum: a cheap substitute for agar in microbial culture media. Lett Appl Microbiol 41:345-349 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01760.x
  15. Jain-Raina R, Babbar SB (2011) Evaluation of blends of alternative gelling agents with agar and development of Xanthagar, a gelling mix, suitable for plant tissue culture media. Asian J Biotechnol 3(2):153-164 https://doi.org/10.3923/ajbkr.2011.153.164
  16. Kang KS, Veeder GT, Mirrasoul PJ, Kaneko T, Cottrell IW (1982) Agar-like polysaccharide produced by Pseudomonas species: production and basic properties. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:1086-1091
  17. Kodym A, Zapata-Arias FJ (2001) Low-cost alternatives for the micropropagation of banana. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 66:67-71 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010661521438
  18. Kohlenbach HW, Wernicke W (1978) Investigations on the inhibitory effect of agar and the function of active carbon in anther culture. Z Pflanzenphysiol 86:463-472 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-328X(78)80292-X
  19. Kumar Goel M, Kumar Kukreja A, Singh Khanuja SP (2007) Costeffective approaches for in vitro mass propagation of Rauwolfia serpentine Benth. Ex Kurz. Asian J Plant Sci 6:957-961 https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2007.957.961
  20. Labropoulos KC, Niesz DE, Danforth SC, Kevrekidis PG (2002a) Dynamic rheology of agar gels: theory and experiments. Part I. Development of a rheological model. Carbohydr Polym 50:393-406 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(02)00084-X
  21. Labropoulos KC, Niesz DE, Danforth SC, Kevrekidis PG (2002b) Dynamic rheology of agar gels: theory and experiments. Part II: gelation behaviour of agar sols and fitting of theoretical rheological model. Carbohydr Polym 50:407-415 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(02)00085-1
  22. Lucyszyn N, Quoirin M, Anjos A, Sierakowski MR (2005) Blends of agar/galactomannan for Marubakaido apple rootstock shoot proliferation. Polimeros: Ciecia e Technologia 15:146-150
  23. Lucyszyn N, Quoirin M, Koehler HS, Reicher F, Sierakowski MR (2006a) Agar/galactomannan blends for strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duchesne) cv. Pelican micropropagation. Sci Hortic 107:358-364 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.11.005
  24. Lucyszyn N, Quoirin M, Ribas LF, Koehler HS, Sierakowski MR (2006b) Micropropagation of 'Durondeau' pear in modified-gelled medium. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 42:287-290 https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2006753
  25. Lucyszyn N, Quoirin M, Homma MM, Sierakowski MR (2007) Agar/galactomannan gels applied to shoot regeneration from tobacco leaves. Biol Plant 51:173-176 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-007-0034-8
  26. McLachlan (1985) Macroalgae (seaweeds): industrial resources and their utilization. Plant Soil 89:137-157 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182240
  27. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15:473-497 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
  28. Nairn BJ (1988) Significance of gelling agents in a production tissue culture laboratory. Comb Proc Int Plant Pop Soc 37:200-205
  29. Ozel CA, Khawar KM, Arslan O (2008) A comparison of the gelling of isubgol agar and gelrite on in vitro shoot regeneration and rooting of variety Samsun of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Sci Hortic 117:174-181 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.03.022
  30. Pasqualetto PL, Zimmerman RH, Fordham I (1988) The influence of cation and gelling agent concentrations on vitrification of apple cultivars in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 14:31-40 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029573
  31. Pereira-Netto AB, Petkowicz CLO, Cruz-Silva CTA, Gazzoni MT, Mello AFP, Silveira JLM (2007) Differential performance of marubakaido apple rootstock shoots grown in culture media containing different agar brands: dynamic rheological analysis. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 43:356-363 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-007-9063-4
  32. Sandolo C, Matricardi P, Alhaique F, Coviello T (2009) Effect of temperature and cross-linking density on rheology of chemical cross-linked guar gum at the gel point. Food Hydrocoll 23:210-220 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.01.001
  33. Sworn G (2007) Natural thickeners (Chap 2). In: Williams PA (ed) Handbook of industrial water soluble polymers. Blackwell, Ames, pp 10-31
  34. Thorpe T, Stasolla C, Yeung EC, de Klerk GJ, Roberts A, George EF (2008) The components of plant tissue culture media II: organic additions, osmotic and pH effects, and support systems. In: George EF, Hall MA, de Klerk GJ (eds) Plant propagation by tissue culture, 3rd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 115-173

피인용 문헌

  1. A Galactomannan-Driven Enhancement of the In Vitro Multiplication Rate for the Marubakaido Apple Rootstock (Malus prunifolia (Willd.) Borkh) is Not Related to the Degradation of the Exogenous Galactom vol.166, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-011-9416-7
  2. Biochemical and morpho-anatomical analyses of strawberry vitroplants hyperhydric tissues affected by BA and gelling agents vol.60, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-737x2013000200002
  3. Induction of reactive oxygen species and the potential role of NADPH oxidase in hyperhydricity of garlic plantlets in vitro vol.254, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-016-0957-z
  4. In vitro tissue culture of apple and other Malus species: recent advances and applications vol.249, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-019-03100-x
  5. Application of naturally occurring mechanical forces in in vitro plant tissue culture and biotechnology vol.16, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2021.1902656