Plant Biotechnology Reports

The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology (한국식물생명공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

AFLP analysis to assess genomic stability in Solanum regenerants derived from wild and cultivated species

  • Aversano, Riccardo (Department of Soil, Plant, Environmental and Animal Production Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II") ;
  • Di Dato, Francesco (Department of Soil, Plant, Environmental and Animal Production Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II") ;
  • Di Matteo, Antonio (Department of Soil, Plant, Environmental and Animal Production Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II") ;
  • Frusciante, Luigi (Department of Soil, Plant, Environmental and Animal Production Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II") ;
  • Carputo, Domenico (Department of Soil, Plant, Environmental and Animal Production Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II")
  • Received : 2010.08.20
  • Accepted : 2011.05.03
  • Published : 2011.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The cultivated potato as well as its tuber-bearing relatives are considered model plants for cell and tissue culture, and therefore for exploiting the genetic variation induced by in vitro culture. The association between molecular stability and tissue culture in different genetic backgrounds and ploidy levels has already been explored. However, it still remains to be ascertained whether somaclonal variation differs between callus-derived chromosome-doubled and undoubled regenerants. Our research aimed at investigating, through amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers, the genetic changes in marker-banding patterns of diploid and tetraploid regenerants obtained from one clone each of Solanum bulbocastanum Dunal and S. cardiophyllum Lindl (both 2n = 2x = 24) and tetraploids from cultivated S. tuberosum L. (2n = 4x = 48). Pairwise comparisons between the banding patterns of regenerants and parents allowed detecting considerable changes associated to in vitro culture both at diploid and tetraploid level. The percentages of polymorphic bands between diploid and tetraploid regenerants were, respectively, 57 and 69% in S. bulbocastanum and 58 and 63% in S. cardiophyllum. On average, the frequencies of lost parental fragments in regenerants were significantly higher than novel bands both in S. bulbocastanum (48 vs. 22%) and S. tuberosum (36 vs. 18%) regenerants. By contrast, in S. cardiophyllum, a similar incidence of the two events was detected (32 vs. 29%). Our results revealed that structural changes after tissue culture process strongly affected the genome of the species studied, but diploid and tetraploids regenerated plants responded equally.

Keywords

References

  1. Abe K, Otomo T, Saito S (1999) The use of somaclonal variation in rice breeding. I. Genetic variation in rice regenerant pedigree lines derived from a single callus. Rep Kyushu Branch Crop Sci Soc Jpn 56:59-63
  2. Arencibia A, Carmona ER, Cornide MT, Castiglione S, Orelly J, Chinea A, Oramai P, Sala F (1999) Somaclonal variation in insectresistance transgenic sugarcane (Saccharum hybrid) plants produced by cell electroporation. Transgenic Res 8:349-360 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008900230144
  3. Aversano R, Savarese S, De Nova JM, Frusciante L, Punzo M, Carputo D (2009) Genetic stability at nuclear and plastid DNA level in regenerated plants of Solanum species and hybrids. Euphytica 165:353-361. doi:10.1007/s10681-008-9797-z
  4. Bairu MW, Adeyemi OA, Van Staden J (2011) Somaclonal variation in plants: causes and detection methods. Plant Growth Regul 63:147-173 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-010-9554-x
  5. Barandalla L, Ritter E, Ruiz De Galarreta JI (2006) Oryzalin treatment of potato diploids yields tetraploid and chimeric plants from which euploids could be derived by callus induction. Potato Res 10:143-154
  6. Bayliss MW (1980) Chromosomal variation in plant tissue culture. Int Rev Cytol 11:113-143
  7. Camadro E, Carputo D, Peloquin SJ (2004) Substitutes for genome differentiation in tuber-bearing Solanum: interspecific pollen- pistil incompatibility, nuclear-cytoplasmic male sterility, and endosperm. Theor Appl Genet 109:1369-1376. doi:10.1007/ s00122-004-1753-2
  8. Cardi T, Carputo D, Frusciante L (1992) In vitro shoot regeneration and chromosome doubling in 2x-potato and 3x-potato clones. Am Potato J 69:1-12 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853404
  9. Carputo D, Barone A, Cardi T, Sebastiano A, Frusciante L, Peloquin SJ (1997) Endosperm balance number manipulation for direct in vivo germplasm introgression to potato from a sexually isolated relative (Solanum commersonii Dun). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12013-12017 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.22.12013
  10. Devarumath RM, Nandy S, Rani V, Marimuthu S, Muraleedharan N, Raina SN (2002) RAPD, ISSR and RFLP fingerprints as useful markers to evaluate genetic integrity of micropropagated plants of three diploid and triploid elite tea clones representing Camellia sinensis (China type) and C. assamica ssp. assamica (Assam- India type). Plant Cell Rep 21:166-173 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-002-0496-2
  11. Golz J, Oh H, Su V, Kusaba M, Newbigin E (2001) Genetic analysis of Nicotiana pollen-part mutants is consistent with the presence of an S-ribonuclease inhibitor at the S-locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:15372-15376. doi:10.1073/pnas.261571598
  12. Grammatikaki G, Vovlas N, Kaltsikes PJ, Sonnino A (1999) Response of potato gametoclones to infection of four root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne) species. Russ J Nematol 7:155- 159
  13. Guo W, Gong L, Ding Z, Li Y, Li F, Zhao S, Liu B (2006) Genomic instability in phenotypically normal regenerants of medical plant Codonopsis lanceolata Benth. et Hook. f., as revealed by ISSR and RAPD markers. Plant Cell Rep 25:896-906 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-006-0131-8
  14. Hale AL, Miller JC (2005) Suitability of AFLP and microsatellite marker analysis for discriminating intraclonal variants of the potato cultivar Russet Norkotah. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 130:624-630
  15. Hashmi G, Huettel R, Meyer R, Krusberg L, Hammerschlag P (1997) RAPD analysis of somaclonal variants derived from embryo callus cultures of peach. Plant Cell Rep 16:624-627 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275503
  16. Hasim ZN, Cambell WF, Carman JG (1990) Morphological analysis of spring wheat (CIMMYT cultivar PC YT-10) somaclones. Plant Cell Tissue Organ 20:95-100 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114706
  17. Hossain MA, Konisho K, Minami M, Nemoto K (2003) Somaclonal variation of regenerated plants in chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L). Euphytica 130:233-239 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022856725794
  18. Iovene M, Frusciante L, Carputo D (2002) Shoot regeneration and chromosome doubling in accessions of 2${\times}$(1EBN) and 4${\times}$(2EBN) wild Solanum species. J Genet Breed 56:99-105
  19. Jain S (2001) Tissue culture-derived variation in crop improvement. Euphytica 118:153-166 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004124519479
  20. Jansky S, Peloquin SJ (2006) Advantages of wild diploid Solanum species over cultivated diploid relatives in potato breeding programs. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:669-674. doi:10.1007/ s10722-004-2949-7
  21. Kaeppler SM, Kaeppler HF, Rhee Y (2000) Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants. Plant Mol Biol 43:179-188
  22. Karp A, Risiott R, Jones MJK, Bright SWJ (1984) Cromosome doubling in monohaploid and dihaploid potatoes by regeneration from coultured leaf explants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ 3:363-373 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043089
  23. Labra M, Vannini C, Grassi F, Bracale M, Balsemin M, Basso B, Sala F (2004) Genomic stability in Arabidopsis thaliana transgenic plants obtained by floral dip. Theor Appl Genet 109:1512-1518 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1773-y
  24. Langille AR, Lan Y, Gustine DL (1998) Seeking improved nutritional properties for the potato: ethionine-resistant protoclones. Am Potato J 70:735-741
  25. Li X, Yu X, Wang N, Feng Q, Dong Z, Liu L, Shen J, Liu B (2007) Genetic and epigenetic instabilities induced by tissue culture in wild barley (Hordeum brevisubulatum (Trin) Link). Plant Cell Tissue Organ 90:153-168 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-007-9224-5
  26. Luu D, Qin X, Morse D, Cappadocia M (2000) S-RNase uptake by compatible pollen tubes in gametophytic self-incompatibility. Nature 407:649-651 https://doi.org/10.1038/35036623
  27. Martelotto LG, Ortiz JPA, Stein J, Espinoza F, Quarin CL, Pessino SC (2007) Genome rearrangements derived from autopolyploidization in Paspalum sp. Plant Sci 172:970-977 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.02.001
  28. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium from rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:251-258
  29. Pijnacker LP, Ferwerda MA, Puite KJ, Schaart JG (1989) Chromosome elimination and mutation in tetraploid somatic hybrids of Solanum tuberosum and Solanum phureja. Plant Cell Rep 8:82-85 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00716844
  30. Polanco C, Ruiz ML (2002) AFLP analysis of somaclonal variation in Arabidopsis thaliana regenerated plants. Plant Sci 162:817-824 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00029-8
  31. Schwarz G, Herz M, Huang XQ, Michalek W, Jahoor A, Wenzel G, Mohler V (2000) Application of fluorescence-based semiautomated AFLP analysis in barley and wheat. Theor Appl Genet 100:545-551 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050071
  32. Sharma SK, Bryan GJ, Winfield MO, Millam S (2007) Stability of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants regenerated via somatic embryos, axillary bud proliferated shoots, microtubers and true potato seeds: a comparative phenotypic, cytogenetic and molecular assessment. Planta 226:1449-1458. doi:10.1007/s00425- 007-0583-2
  33. Sree Ramulu K (1987) Genetic instability during plant regeneration in potato, origin and implications. Plant Physiol 6:211-218
  34. Stupar RM, Bhaskar PB, Yandell BS, Rensink WA, Hart AL, Ouyang S, Veilleux RE, Busse JS, Erhardt RJ, Buell CR, Jiang J (2007) Phenotypic and transcriptomic changes associated with potato autopolyploidization. Genetics 176:2055-2067. doi:10.1534/ genetics.107.074286
  35. Sultana R, Tahira F, Tayyab H, Khurram B, Shiekh R (2005) RAPD characterization of somaclonal variation in indica basmati rice. Pak J Bot 37:249-262
  36. Taylor RJ, Secor GA, Ruby CL, Orr PH (1993) Tuber yield, soft rot resistance, bruising resistance and processing quality in a population of potato (cv. Crystal) somatoclones. Am Potato J 70:117-130 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857179
  37. Thieme R, Griess H (1996) Somaclonal variation of haulm growth, earliness, and yield in potato. Potato Res 39:355-365 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357939
  38. Vazquez AM (2001) Insight into somaclonal variation. Plant Biosyst 135:57-62 https://doi.org/10.1080/11263500112331350650
  39. Veilleux RE, Johnson AAT (1998) Somaclonal variation: molecular evidence and utilization in plant breeding. Plant Breed Rev 16:229-268
  40. Vendrame WA, Kochert G, Wetzstein HY (1999) AFLP analysis of variation in pecan somatic embryos. Plant Cell Rep 28:853-857
  41. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407-4414 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/23.21.4407
  42. Wilhelm E (2000) Somatic embryogenesis in oak (Quercus spp.). In Vitro Cell Dev-Pl 36:349-357 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-000-0062-y

Cited by

  1. Shoot organogenesis in three Miscanthus species and evaluation for genetic uniformity using AFLP analysis vol.113, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-012-0284-9
  2. Assessment of somaclonal variation in somatic embryo-derived plants of yacon [Smallanthus sonchifolius (Poepp. and Endl.) H. Robinson] using inter simple sequence repeat analysis and flow cytometry vol.17, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2013.12.011