DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster and Nuclear Safety Systems in Korea

후쿠시마 원전사고와 한국의 원전안전정책

  • Choi, Ye-Yong (Asian Citizen's Center for Environment and Health, Department of Occupational & Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Suzuki, Akira (Solidarity for Worker's Health) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Hong (Federation for Environmental Movement KyungJoo) ;
  • Paek, Do-Myung (Asian Citizen's Center for Environment and Health, Department of Occupational & Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Seoul National University)
  • 최예용 (환경보건시민센터, 서울대학교 보건대학원 직업환경건강연구실) ;
  • ;
  • 이상홍 (경주환경운동연합) ;
  • 백도명 (환경보건시민센터, 서울대학교 보건대학원 직업환경건강연구실)
  • Received : 2011.06.16
  • Accepted : 2011.06.21
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

Exactly 25 years after the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, 11th of March 2011 the Fukushima nuclear accident occurred in Japan and was ranked at level 7 same to the Chernobyl. A Korean and Japanese joint civil survey was conducted around Fukushima on April 13-17. The radiation survey data clearly shows a large hotspot area between 20 km and 50 km radius north and west direction from the accident reactors, with the highest radiation recorded being 55.64 ${\mu}Sv/hr$ in the air, 99.89 ${\mu}Sv/hr$ in the surface air, and 36.16 ${\mu}Sv/hr$ in a car, respectively. 3.65 ${\mu}Sv/hr$ in the air and 6.89 ${\mu}Sv/hr$ in the surface air were detected at the playground of an elementary school in Fukushima City. Spring came with full cherry blossoms in Fukushima, but it was silent spring of radiation contamination. Interviews with Fukushima nuclear refugees reveal serious problems about Japanese nuclear safety systems, such as there was no practical evacuation drill within 1-10 km and no plan at all for 10-30 km areas. Several reforms items for Korean nuclear safety system can be suggested: minimization of accident damage, clear separation of regulatory and safety bureaus with a new and independent administrating agency, community participation and agreement regarding the safety system and levels, which is the major concern of 80% Korean. To tackle threats of nuclear disaster in neighboring nations like China, a new position entitled 'Ambassador for nuclear safety diplomacy' is highly necessary. The nuclear safety of Korea should no longer be the monopoly of those nuclear engineers and limited technocrats criticized as a 'nuclear mafia'.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi YY. Remembrance for the Future Chornobyl+25. In: Asian Citizen's Center for Environment and Health. et al. Nuclear Disaster and Health Threat. Seoul; Seminar Proceedings; 2011. p.32.
  2. Choi YY. Silent Spring in Fukushima & Chernobyl. Seoul: Survey Report; 2011. p 11.
  3. Ha MN. International management criteria for radiation exposure of general public. In: The Korean Society of environmental Health and Toxicology. Fukushima nuclear disaster and Public Health. Seoul; Symposium Proceedings; 2011. p.53.
  4. Choi YY. Lessons from Fukushima. In: Asian Citizen's Center for Environment and Health. et al. Alternatives for Nuclear Safety System in Korea. Seoul; Symposium Proceedings; 2011; p.11-13,15-20.
  5. Seoul Daily, Japanese prime minister order to shut down Hamaoka nuclear reactors. http://www.seoul.co.kr/news/newsView.php?id=20110507012005 [accessed 7 May 2011]
  6. KBS. No border for the radiation. http://news.kbs.co.kr/science/2011/06/08/2303869.html [accessed 8 June 2011]
  7. UNO Saeko. A Fukushima testimony of a Japanese mother refugee. Seoul. 2011. p.13-15.
  8. Choi YY. Silent Spring in Fukushima. In: Korean Society of Environmental Health. Current Issues in Environment and Health. Seoul. 2011. p.29, 30.
  9. Korean government. Decision criteria for urgent resident protection (15-1). Act for nuclear facilities protection and radiation disaster prevention.
  10. Lee JH. Tasks for public health protection from the radiation threat. In: The Korean Society of environmental Health and Toxicology. Fukushima nuclear disaster and Public Health; Symposium Proceedings; Seoul. 2011. p.65-67.
  11. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Publication 103. Korean version. p.69.
  12. Korea Associated News Agency. Higher opposition of public opinion against nuclear reactors in Korea-China-Japan. http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2011/05/26/0200000000AKR20110526039500073. HTML?did=1179m. [accessed 14 June 2011].

Cited by

  1. Radiation Exposure - An Important Environmental Factor vol.37, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2011.37.4.235
  2. Analysis of Awareness of Radiation and Nuclear Power Plants after Fukushima Nuclear Accident vol.13, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.09.281