Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Empirical Test for affecting University-Institute R&D cooperation system on performance in the geoscience field

학·연 연구개발 협력시스템이 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증분석 : 지질자원분야를 중심으로

  • Lee, Ok-Sun (Korea Institute of Geoscience And Mineral resources) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Dae (School of business, Chungbuk national University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Yong (Korea Institute of Geoscience And Mineral resources) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Wook (Korea Institute of Geoscience And Mineral resources)
  • Received : 2011.01.19
  • Accepted : 2011.06.09
  • Published : 2011.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As R&D cooperation activities with various partners are becoming huge in scale and scope, to achieve successful R&D performance, we need to systematically divide by its characteristics and to stratagemically carry out R&D cooperation activities. In this paper we propose R&D cooperation system between the university and the R&D institute in the geoscience field. The cooperation system can include activities of joint R&D program execution, R&D researcher exchange, R&D infrastructure use, technology commercialization and business exchange. Its system seems to positively affect on R&D performance and when considering the level of innovation as a moderating variable, in the situation of high innovation environment its system is able to positively affect on the R&D performance. For different effects of R&D cooperation activities on individual cooperation performance we can choose proper cooperation activities for R&D cooperation purposes.

다양한 연구개발 협력파트너와의 활동이 규모와 범위를 넘어 광대해 짐에 따라 성공적인 연구개발성과 확보를 위하여 협력활동을 체계적으로 구분하고 전략적으로 수행할 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 지질자원분야를 대상으로 대학과 출연(연), 두 연구개발주체 간의 연구개발 협력시스템을 제안하였다. 공동 연구개발프로그램 수행, 연구자 교류, 연구개발인프라 활용, 기술사업화 및 기관 교류활동으로 구성된 학 연 연구개발 협력시스템을 통한 협력활동은 연구개발성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치며, 특히 혁신환경정도를 구분하여 학 연 연구개발 협력시스템이 성과에 미치는 영향을 살펴봤을 때, 높은 혁신환경에서 협력시스템이 성과에 미치는 영향이 더 큼을 확인하였다. 또한 협력활동 종류에 따라 개별 연구개발성과에 미치는 영향이 다름에 따라 연구개발협력 목적에 따라 활용 가능한 협력활동 형태를 고려할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Boardman et al., "Implementing a 'bottom-up', multi-sector research collaboration: the case of Texas air quality collaboration", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol.15, No.1, pp. 54, 63, 64, 2006.
  2. Brown et al., "Measuring R&D productivity: the ideal system measures quality, quantity and cost, is simple, and emphasizes evaluation of R&D outcomes rather than behaviors", Research.Technology Management, Vol.41, Issue6, pp. 31, 1998.
  3. Cho, Hyun-dae et al., "An analysis of sustainability of government-supported research institutes and policy recommendations", pp. 31, STEPI, 2008.
  4. Devenport et al., "Collaborative research programmes: building trust form difference", Technovation, Vol.19, pp. 32, 38, 1999
  5. ETRI, "2009 performance report", pp. 271, 273, 278, ETRI, 2010.
  6. Hagedoorn et al., "Research partnerships", Research Policy, Vol.29 pp. 568, 2000.
  7. Hong, Soon-wook et. al, "Organizational capability and performance : a comparative study of korean and the united states manufacturing R&D organizations", journal of technology innovation, Vol.12, No.4, pp745, 751, 2009.
  8. Katz et al., "What is research collaboration?", Research Policy, Vol.26, pp. 9, 1997.
  9. KICT, "2009 performance report", pp. 362, 363, KICT, 2010.
  10. Kim, Eun-sil et al., "Study of the effect of developing technology characteristics, partner characteristics and management characteristics on mutual R&D performance using moderating effect", proceeding of the korean association of small business studies in summer, 2007, pp. 3, 2007.
  11. Kim, Gye-soo, "New AMOS 16.0 structural equation model analysis", pp. 158, 207, Hannarae publishing Co., 2008.
  12. Kim, Hyun-ho et al., "Report on the korean innovation survey 2008: manufacturing Sector", pp. 91, STEPI, 2008.
  13. Kim, Jongbum, "Current status and outlook of the institute-academia collaboration in aerospace field", current industrial and technological trends in aerospace, Vol.6, No.2, pp. 10, 2008.
  14. Kim, Kyung-sun, "A Study on Joint Research and Development Agreements", Journal of Business Administration & Law, Vol.19, No.3, pp. 407, 412, 2009.
  15. Kim, Seok-kwan et al., "Open innovation: Theory, practices and policy implications", pp. 67, 74, STEPI, 2008.
  16. Kim, Seok-kwan, "Strategic implications for public sector by open innovation", pp. 18, STEPI, 2009.
  17. Kim, Seong-yong et al., "Planning the Geo-Technology Policy for Research Efficiency & International Cooperation", pp. 113, KIGAM, 2009.
  18. Kim, Wand-dong, "Factors affecting creativity of public research organizations and their implications", pp. 51, 55, 57, STEPI, 2008.
  19. KIGAM, "2009 performance report", pp. 103, 175, 249, 277, 382, KIGAM, 2010.
  20. KIMM, "2009 performance report", pp. 326, 334, KIMM, 2010.
  21. Lim, Young-mo et al., "Open technology innovation's diffusion and implication", pp. 5, SERI, 2006.
  22. Min, Chul-koo et al., "Strategic cooperative system between regional university and GRI", pp. 9, 131, STEPI, 2004.
  23. Min, Chul-koo et al., "Policy alternatives for creating synergy effect between education and R&D function in university", pp. 87, 95, STEPI, 2008.
  24. Rigby et al., "Management Tools and Trends", Bain & Company, pp. 10, 2007.
  25. Shenhar et al., "Reinventing project management", Harvard business school press, 2007.
  26. National science and technology information service, www.ntis.go,kr, access time , October 30th, 2010.