Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Recognition of Personal Health Record

개인보건정보기록에 대한 인지도

  • Bae, Se-Eun (Laboratory of Computational Biology & Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Ha-Yeon (Laboratory of Computational Biology & Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Son, Hyeon-S. (Laboratory of Computational Biology & Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Rhee, Hyun-Sill (Department of Health Management, College of Health Sciences, Korea University)
  • 배세은 (서울대학교 보건대학원 생명정보학연구실) ;
  • 김하연 (서울대학교 보건대학원 생명정보학연구실) ;
  • 손현석 (서울대학교 보건대학원 생명정보학연구실) ;
  • 이현실 (고려대학교 보건과학대학 보건행정학과)
  • Received : 2011.02.10
  • Accepted : 2011.04.07
  • Published : 2011.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: Using a PHR(Personal Health Record) is very important for the management of chronic disease and health. The young age group in this study was asked to pretend that they were members in the old age group (adult group here after) in order to investigate the recognition level differences in such conditions. Methods: We conducted face to face surveys with two age groups. 131 Adults and 398 University students, from May 11 to 22 in 2009. The questionnaires were composed of 18 items. Results & Conclusion: Adults replied more favorably than University students in using PHR willingness(University group 3.3score, Adults 3.7score) and recommendation(university 3.1score, Adults 3.8score). Adults liked paper PHR (63.2%), whereas, University students favored electronic Personal Health Record (71.1%). University students were highly concerned about disclosing the information(4.5score) of their PHR. They thought the appropriate time of education for PHR is high school or University degree. Therefore, in the future, it is vital that a PHR for young age group should be begun in early education and that an ePHR should be developed.

목적 : 성인병관리 및 개인건강관리를 위해 개인건강기록(PHR)은 매우 중요하다. 현재 노인 또는 장년층과 미래 노인, 장년층과의 차이를 비교해 보기 위해 젊은층(대학생)과 성인을 대상으로 조사하였다. 방법: 두 연령집단의 면대면 설문조사를 성인(131명)과 대학생(398명)을 2009년 5월 11일부터 22일까지 실시하였다. 설문지는 18개 문항으로 구성되었다. 결과 및 결론: 젊은층보다는 성인층에서 PHR을 사용하겠다는 의지(대학생그룹3.3, 성인그룹3.7)와 지인들에게 PHR을 추천하겠다는 의지(대학생그룹3.1, 성인그룹3.8)가 비교적 높게 나타났다. 반면, 성인그룹은 종이형 PHR(63.2%)을 선호하였으며 대학생그룹은 ePHR(71.1%)을 더 선호하였고, PHR에 담겨져 있는 정보유출에 대한 우려가 성인그룹(3.7)보다 대학생그룹(4.5)이 높은 것으로 나타났다. PHR에 대한 교육 시기는 고등학교와 대학교로 응답하였다. 따라서 젊은층의 PHR활성화를 위해서는 ePHR에 대한 조기교육과 사용이 편리한 PHR개발이 이루어져야 할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. AHIMA e-HIM Personal Health Record Work Group, "The Role of the Personal health Record in the EHR.", Journal of AHIMA 76, no.7 64A-D, 2005.
  2. Reti SR, Feldman HJ, Safran C. "Governance for Personal Health Records", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 제16권, 제1호, pp14-17, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2854
  3. Kim MI, Johnson KB. "Personal Health Records: evaluation of functionality and utility", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 제9권, 제2호, pp171-180, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M0978
  4. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, Donelan K, Ferris TG, Jha A, et al. "Electronic health records in ambulatory care-a national survey of physicians", N Engl J Med, 제359권, 제1호, pp50-60, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0802005
  5. Kaelber DC, Jha AK, Johnston D, Middleton B, Bates DW. "A research agenda for Personal Health Records(PHRs)". J Am Med Inform Assoc 제15권, 제6호, pp729-736, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2547
  6. Ball MJ, Smith C, Bakalar RS. "Personal Health Records: empowering consumers". J Healthc Inf Manag, 제21권, 제1호, pp76-86, 2007.
  7. Kim MJ, Choi KH, Lee KS. "A study on awareness and knowledge of obesity, life style, and eating habits according to body mass index in high school students", J Korean Pediatr Soc, 제45권, 제12호, pp1491-1496, 2002.
  8. Dorr D, Bonner LM, Cohen AN, Shoai RS, Perrin R, Chaney E, Young AS. "Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: a literature review", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 제14권, 제2호, pp.156-63, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2255
  9. Hess R, Bryce CL, Paone S, Fischer G, McTigue KM, Olshansky E, Zickmund S, Fitzgerald K, Siminerio L. "Exploring challenges and potentials of personal health records in diabtes self-management: implementation and initial assessment". Telemed J E Health, 제13권, 제5호, pp509-17, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2006.0089
  10. Wen KY, Kreps G, Zhu F, Miller S. "Consumers' perceptions about and use of the internet for personal health records and health information exchange: analysis of the 2007 health information national trends survey". J Med Internet Res. 제12권, 제4호, 2010.
  11. Botts NE, Horan TA. "Electronic personal health records and systems to improve care for vulnerable populations", AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 11:880. Oct. 2007.
  12. Kim EH, Kim Y. "Digital divide: Use of electronic personal health record by different population groups", ConfProc IEEE Engl Med Biol Soc. 제1권, pp1759-62, 2010.