DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

메밀(Fagopyrum species)의 생장에 따른 플라보노이드 함량의 품종별 차이

A time-course study of flavonoids in buckwheats (Fagopyrum species)

  • 이민기 (충남대학교 생물환경화학과) ;
  • 박석훈 (충남대학교 생물환경화학과) ;
  • 김선주 (충남대학교 생물환경화학과)
  • Lee, Min-Ki (Dept. of Bio-Environment Chemistry, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Park, Suk-Hoon (Dept. of Bio-Environment Chemistry, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Ju (Dept. of Bio-Environment Chemistry, Chungnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2011.01.12
  • 심사 : 2011.03.09
  • 발행 : 2011.03.30

초록

Flavonoid contents of common buckwheat (cv. Kitawase) and tartary buckwheat (cv. Hokkai T 8, Hokkai T 9 and Hokkai T 10) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Moreover, they were measured at different plant developments such as 10, 18, 20, 22 and 30 days after sowing (DAS) and with plant parts including leaf, stem and flower harvested at 30 DAS. Total flavonoids including chlorogenic acid, four kinds of C-glycosylflavones (orientin, isoorientin, vitexin, isovitexin) and rutin of tartary buckwheats (range of 44.2-54.7, mean 44.2) were found 35% higher than those of common buckwheat (28.9 mg/g dry wt.). Among them, rutin was measured above 80% of total flavonoid contents. The other flavonoids (chlorogenic acid and four kinds of C-glycosylflavones) presented the highest level at 10 DAS and decreased according to plant developments. On the other hand, rutin content of Kitawase presented the highest level (33.6 mg/g dry wt.) at 22 DAS and decreased up to 30 DAS. Rutin content in tartary buckwheat temporarily decreased from 10 to 18 DAS and then reversely increased up to 30 DAS presented the highest level as 'U' curve. In Hokkai T 10, rutin content was found the highest level (53.8 mg/g dry wt.) at 30 DAS. In different plant parts harvested at 30 DAS, rutin content of leaf (range of 42.8-68.0, mean 57.0) was 5.3-fold higher than that of stem (range of 8.0-15.9, 10.8 mg/g dry wt.), regardless of cultivar. Significantly, rutin content (78.7) in the flower of Kitawase was 1.8 times higher than in the leaf and 9.8 times in the stem. Especially, chlorogenic acid content (14.6 mg/g dry wt.) in the flower of Kitawase was 63-fold higher than in the leaf, and 20-fold in the stem.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cheristel QD, Gressier B, Vasseur J, Dine T, Brunet C, Luyckx M, Cazin JC, Bailleul F, Trotin F. 2000. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) hulls and flour. J. Ethnopharmacol. 72: 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00196-3
  2. Choi BH. 1992. Status of buckwheat genetic resources in East Asia-1991. Korean J. Breed. Sci. 24: 293-301. [in Korean]
  3. Griffith JQ, Couch JF, Lindauer MA. 1995. Effect of rutin on increased capillary fragility in man. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 55: 228-229.
  4. Havsteen BH 2002. The biochemistry and medical significance of the flavonoids. Pharmacol. Ther. 96: 67-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-7258(02)00298-X
  5. Ikeda S, Yamashita T, Murakami T. 1995. Minerals in buckwheat. In Current Advances in Buckwheat Research editied by Matano T, Ujihara A. pp. 789-792. Shinshu University Press, Asahi Matsumoto City.
  6. Jiang P, Burczynski F, Campbell C, Pierce G, Austria JA, Briggs CJ. 2007. Rutin and flavonoid contents in three buckwheat species Fagopyrum esculentum, F. tataricum. and F. homotropicum and their protective effects against lipid peroxidation. Food. Res. Intern. 40: 356-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2006.10.009
  7. Kim DK, Chon SU, Lee KD, Kim JB, Rim YS. 2008. Variation of flavonoids contents in plants of mungbean. Korean J. Crop. Sci. 53(3): 279-284. [in Korean]
  8. Kim JH, Lee BC, Kim JH, Sim GS, Lee DH, Lee KE, Yun YP, Pyo HB. 2005. The isolation and antioxidative effects of vitexin from Acer palmatum. Arch. Pharm. Res. 28(2): 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02977715
  9. Kim SJ, Zaidul ISM, Maeda T, Suzuki T, Hashimoto N, Takigawa S, Noda T, Matsuura-Endo C, Yamauchi H. 2007. A time-course study of flavonoids in the sprouts of tartary (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.) buckwheats. Sci. Hortic. 115: 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2007.07.018
  10. Kim SJ, Zaidul ISM, Maeda T, Suzuki T, Hashimoto N, Takigawa S, Noda T, Matsuura-Endo C, Yamauchi H. 2008. Comparision of phenolic compounds between common and tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum) sprouts. Food Chem. 110: 814-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.02.050
  11. Kim SL, Kim SK, Park CH. 2004. Introduction and nutritional evaluation of buckwheat sprouts as a new vegetable. Food. Res. Intern. 37: 319-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2003.12.008
  12. Kreft I, Fabjan N, Yasumoto K. 2006. Rutin content in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) food materials and products. Food Chem. 98: 508-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.081
  13. Lee JS, Park SJ, Sung KS, Han CK, Lee MH, Jung CW, Kwon TB. 2000. Effects of germinated-buckwheat on blood pressure, plasma glucose and lipid levels of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 32: 206-211. [in Korean]
  14. Lamb CJ, Rubery PH. 1976. Photocontrol of chlorogenic acid biosynthesis in potato tuber discs. Phytochemistry 15: 665-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)94416-9
  15. Margna U, Margna E. 1978. Differential biosynthesis of buckwheat flavonoids from endogenous substrates. Biochem. Physiol. Pflanzen 173: 347-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-3796(17)30503-6
  16. Marshall HG, Pomeranz Y. 1982. Buckwheat description, breeding, production and utilization. Advances Cereal Sci. Technol. 5: 157-212.
  17. Matsubara Y, Kumamoto H, Iizuka Y, Murakami T, Okamoto K, Miyake H, Yokoi K. 1985. Structure and hypotensive effect of flavonoid glycosides in Citrus unshiu peelings. Agri. Biol. Chem. 49: 900-914.
  18. Moon TC, Park JO, Chung KW, Son KH, Kim HP, Kang SS, Chang HW, Chung KC. 1999. Anti-inflammatory activity of the flavonoid components of Lonicera japonica. Yakhak Hoeji 43: 117-123. [in Korean]
  19. Orhan DD, Aslan M, Aktay G, Ergun E, Yesilada E, Ergun F. 2003. Evaluation of hepatoprotective effect of Gentiana olivieri herbs on subacute administration and isolation of active principle. Life Sci. 72: 2273-2283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(03)00117-6
  20. Park BJ, Chang KJ, Park JJ, Park CH. 2004. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on the growth of tatary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum). Korean J. Plant Resour. 17: 352-357. [in Korean]
  21. Park BJ, Kwon SM, Park CH, Chang KJ, Park JI, 2005. Comparison in growth characters and rutin contents at early stage between common (F. esculentum) and tartary buckwheat (F. tataricum). Korean J. Crop Sci. 50: 150-151. [in Korean]
  22. Park BJ, Kwon SM, Park JI, Chang KJ, Park CH. 2005. Phenolic compounds in common and tartary buckwheat. Korean J. Crop Sci. 50: 175-180. [in Korean]
  23. Pomeranz Y, Marshall HG, Robbins GS, Gilbertson JT. 1975. Protein content and amino acid composition of maturing buckwheat. Cereal Chem. 52: 479-485.
  24. Pomeranz Y. 1983. Buckwheat: structure, composition and utilization. CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 19: 213-258.
  25. Sharma RR, Demirci A, Beuchat LR, Pett WF. 2002. Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on inoculated alfalfa seeds with ozonated water and heat treatment. J. Food Prot. 65: 447-451. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-65.3.447
  26. Suzuki T, Kimura M, Kawakatsu M, Nakatsuka K, Kim SJ, Mukasa Y, Yokota S, Yamauchi H, Takigawa S, Noda T, Hashimoto N, Matsuura-Endo C. 2008. "Hokkai T 9" and "Hokkai T 10": new tartary buckwheat varieties for sprouts and dried powders. Hokkaido Agricultural Research 188: 45-53. [in Japanese]
  27. Watanabe M, Ito M. 2002. Changes in antioxidative activity and flavonoids composition of the extracts from aerial parts of buckwheat during growth period. Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi 49: 119-125. [in Japanese] https://doi.org/10.3136/nskkk.49.119
  28. Weiss A, Hammes WP. 2003. Thermal seed treatment to improve the food safety status of sprouts. J. Appl. Bot. 77: 152-155.

피인용 문헌

  1. Developing and Validating a Method for Separating Flavonoid Isomers in Common Buckwheat Sprouts Using HPLC-PDA vol.8, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8110549