DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis on the status of community forest in overseas

해외의 Community Forest 현황 분석

  • Yoon, Jun-Young (Department of Environment Forestry Resources, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Park, Gwan-Soo (Department of Environment Forestry Resources, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kang, Ho-Duck (Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk University) ;
  • Kim, Se-Bin (Department of Environment Forestry Resources, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Joon-Woo (Department of Environment Forestry Resources, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Hang-Goo (Department of Environment Forestry Resources, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Jin (Department of Environment Forestry Resources, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Park, Beom-Hwan (Department of Environment Forestry Resources, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jang, Hyeon-Su (Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk University) ;
  • Sung, Yong-Joo (Department of Biobased Materials, Chungnam National University)
  • 윤준영 (충남대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 박관수 (충남대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 강호덕 (동국대학교 바이오환경과학과) ;
  • 김세빈 (충남대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 이준우 (충남대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 이항구 (충남대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 이상진 (충남대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 박범환 (충남대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 장현수 (동국대학교 바이오환경과학과) ;
  • 성용주 (충남대학교 환경소재공학과)
  • Received : 2011.02.05
  • Accepted : 2011.03.09
  • Published : 2011.03.30

Abstract

This study was conducted to build frameworks for a guideline of community forest projects with respect to ODA of Korea (Official Development Assistant) in forest fields. Community forestry is a worldwide phenomenon which began in developing countries such as Nepal, Gambia, Guinea, and Indonesia and has been gradually recognized as an effective measure for ODA in forestry areas from ODA/DAC countries and the other international donors. This study investigated types of community forest status, mechanisms of community forest project conducted by ODA/DAC countries or the other international donors, and CFM (Community Forest management) success factors. As a result of our study, there are different types of resource users, having different economic and social status, perspectives, knowledge systems, values, understandings and objectives in community based forestry. Consequently, the clear forest tenure systems enabling communities to get motivated for the projects, the most appropriate agroforestry systems in different countries, capability of community to manage forest and etc must be considered carefully when the community forest project are implemented for ODA of Korea in order to gain successful results from ODA in forestry fields.

Keywords

References

  1. Bruce JW. 2004. Strengthening property rights for the poor. In Collective Action and Property Rights for Sustainable Development edited by Meinzen-Dick R, Di Gregorio M. International Food Policy Research Institute. Washington, DC.
  2. CIFOR(Center for International Forestry Research). 2001. Social Learning in Community Forests. pp. 190-203.
  3. FAO(Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2006. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005. pp. 107-121.
  4. Hobley M, Baral J, Rasaily N, Shrestha B. 2007. Nepal Swiss Community Forestry Project-External Review. 15 pp. Accessed in http://www.forestrynepal.org/project/268 on 3 March 2011.
  5. KOICA(Korea International Cooperation Agency). 2010. KOICA's Measures for Introducing Public-Private Partnership Cooperative Development Project. pp. 16-18. [in Korean]
  6. KOICA(Korea International Cooperation Agency). 2010. Study on ODA Strategy for Establishment of Model Implementing PD/AAA. pp. 97-100. [in Korean]
  7. National Community Forestry Center. 2000. What is Community Forestry and Why does it Matter?
  8. Oikawa Y. 1998. Rich Gardens, Poor Forest? Case Study in Java. 173 pp. University of Kyoto.
  9. Pokharel BK, Tumbahamphe N. 1999. Community forestry development action: A synthesis of NUKCFP reports and publications. Nepal-UK Community Forestry Project. Project report G/NUKCFP/52. 125 pp. Accessed in http://www. forestrynepal.org/project/2903 on 3 March 2011.
  10. RECOFTC(Regional Community Forestry Training Center). 2004. Linkages between Community Forestry and Poverty. pp. 2-6.
  11. Reeb D, Romano F. 2007. Forest tenure in Africa and South and Southeast Asia: Implications for sustainable forest management and poverty alleviation. International Conference on Poverty Reduction and Forests, Bangkok, Thai. pp. 1-10.
  12. Singh BK. 2001. Models for Implementing Community Forestry and the Concept of User Groups. pp. 13-21.
  13. Somarriba E. 1992. Revisiting the past: an essay on agroforestry definition. Agroforestry system. 19: 234-236.
  14. Suh JH, 2005, Identification of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the community-based forest management program. Annals of Tropical Research. 27(1): 55-66.
  15. USAID(United States Agency for International Development). 2009. Transboundary Landscape Management to Improve Livelihoods and Biodiversity Conservation: Case of Guinea and Sierra Leone (LAMIL-TBA). pp. 8-27.
  16. USAID(United States Agency for International Development). 2010. USAID's Enduring Legacy in Natural Forestrs: Livelihoods, Landsacapes, and Governance. pp. 4-15.
  17. White A, Martin A. 2002. Who owns the world's forest?. Forest Trends. 5 pp.