DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Rainfall Erosivity in Korea using Different Kinetic Energy Equations

강우 운동에너지식에 따른 한국의 강우침식인자 평가

  • Lee, Joon-Hak (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Shin, Ju-Young (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Heo, Jun-Haeng (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • 이준학 (연세대학교 토목환경공학과) ;
  • 신주영 (연세대학교 토목환경공학과) ;
  • 허준행 (연세대학교 토목환경공학과)
  • Received : 2011.05.26
  • Accepted : 2011.06.08
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

A particular empirical equation for rainfall kinetic energy is needed to compute rainfall erosivity, calculated by the annual sum of the product of total rainfall energy and maximum 30-min rainfall intensity. If rainfall kinetic energy equation was different, rainfall erosivity will be produced differently. However, the previous studies in Korea had little concern about rainfall kinetic energy equation and it was not clear which rainfall kinetic energy is suitable for Korea. The purpose of this study is to analyze and evaluate the difference of the rainfall erosivity based on different rainfall kinetic energy equations obtained from previous studies. This study introduced new rainfall erosivity factors based on rainfall kinetic energy equation of Noe and Kwon (1984) that is only regression model developed in Korea. Data of annual rainfall erosivity for 21 weather stations in 1980~1999 were used in this study. The result showed that rainfall erosivity factors by the previous equations had been about 10~20% overestimated than rainfall erosivity by Noe and Kwon (1984)'s equation in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown, L.C. and G.R. Foster. 1987. Storm erosivity using idealized intensity distributions. Trans ASAE 30:379-386. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31957
  2. Coutinho, M.A. and P.P. Tomas. 1995. Characterization of raindrop size distributions at the Vale Formoso Experimental Erosion Center. Catena 25:187-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(95)00009-H
  3. Foster, G.R., D.C. Yoder, G.A. Weesies, D.K. McCool, K.C. McGregor, and R.L. Bingner. 2003. RUSLE 2.0 user's guide. USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Washington D.C.
  4. Jayawardena, A.W. and R.B. Rezaur. 2000. Drop size distribution and kinetic energy load of rainstorms in Hong Kong. Hydrol Process. 14:1069-1082. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(20000430)14:6<1069::AID-HYP997>3.0.CO;2-Q
  5. Jung, P.K., M.H. Ko, J.N. Im, K.T. Um., and D.U.. Choi. 1983. Rainfall Erosion factor for estimating Soil Loss. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 16(2):112-118.
  6. Korean National Emergency Management Agency. 2005. Previousness Disaster Impact Assessment Handbook. p. 97. Seoul, Korea.
  7. Kwok, Y.M., J.K. Park, J.S. Jung, S.E. Jung, and D.Y. Yoon. 2005. Analysis and Assessment of reliability of 1 minute-based rainfall data. p. 316-317. Proceedings of the Spring Meeting, Korean Meteorological Society. Gangneong, Korea.
  8. Laws, J.O. and D.A. Parsons. 1943. The relation of raindrop size to intensity. Transactions, American Geophysical Union. 24:452-460. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR024i002p00452
  9. Lee, J.S. and J.H. Chung. 2009. Chracteristics Analysis for RUSLE Factors based on Measured Data of Gangwon Experimental Watershed ( I ). J. of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation. 9(6):111-117.
  10. McGregor, K.C., R.L. Bingner, A.J. Bowie, and G.R. Foster. 1995. Erosivity index values for northern Mississippi. Trans ASAE. 38:1039-1047. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.27921
  11. Noe, J.K. and S.K. Kwon. 1984. A study of the estimation of rainfall kinetic energy based on rainfall characteristics. College of Agricultural Research. Seoul National University 9(2):23-31.
  12. Onega, K., K. Shirai, and A. Yoshinaga. 1988. Rainfall erosion and how to control its effects on farmland in Okinawa. p. 627-639. In Rimwanich, S. (eds). Land conservation for future generations. Department of Land Development, Bangkok.
  13. Park, J.H., H.S. Woo, C.K. Pyun, and K.I. Kim. 2000. A study of distribution of rainfall erosivity in USLE/RUSLE for estimation of soil loss. J. Korean Water Res. Assoc. 33(5):603-610.
  14. Renard, K.G., G.R. Foster, G.A. Weesies, D.K. McCool, and D.C. Yoder. 1997. Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). USDA Agric. Research Service. Washington, D.C.
  15. Rosewell, C.J. 1986. Rainfall kinetic energy in eastern Australia. J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 25:1695-1701. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025<1695:RKEIEA>2.0.CO;2
  16. Shin, Y. 2010. Estimation of rainfall erodibility factor R in the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) using 1 minute rainfall data. p. 97. the Master Degree Thesis. Jeonju University. Jeonju City, Korea.
  17. Wischmeier, W.H. and D.D. Smith. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning. USDA Agric. Handbook. No. 537. Washington, D.C.
  18. Yu. B. 1999. A comparison of the R-factor in the universal soil loss equation and revised universal soil loss equation. Trans ASAE. 42:1615-1620. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.13327
  19. Zanchi, C. and Torri, D. 1980. Evaluation of rainfall energy in central Italy. p. 133-142. In De Boodt, M., and D. Gabriels. (eds), Assessment of erosion. Wiley, New York.

Cited by

  1. The Redetermination of USLE Rainfall Erosion Factor for Estimation of Soil Loss at Korea vol.44, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2011.44.6.977
  2. Analysis of the Characteristic of Monthly Rainfall Erosivity in Korea with Derivation of Rainfall Energy Equation vol.13, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2013.13.3.177
  3. Evaluation of Erosivity Index (EI) in Calculation of R Factor for the RUSLE vol.45, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2012.45.1.112
  4. Spatial Rainfall Considering Elevation and Estimation of Rain Erosivity Factor R in Revised USLE Using 1 Minute Rainfall Data and Program Development vol.19, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2016.19.4.130
  5. Spatiotemporal Uncertainty of Rainfall Erosivity Factor Estimated Using Different Methodologies vol.58, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2016.58.6.055