대한치과교정학회지 (The korean journal of orthodontics)

  • 제41권2호
  • /
  • Pages.127-137
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 2234-7518(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-372X(eISSN)
대한치과교정학회 (The Korean Association Of Orthodontists)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Differences in opening and protrusive mandibular movements between Class I and II malocclusions in healthy adolescents

  • Tuncer, Bureu Balos (Department of Orthodontics, Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry) ;
  • Ozogul, Berk (Department of Orthodontics, Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry) ;
  • Akkaya, Sevil (Department of Orthodontics, Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry)
  • 투고 : 2010.09.30
  • 심사 : 2011.01.29
  • 발행 : 2011.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the opening and protrusive mandibular movements between Class I and Class II malocclusions in healthy adolescents by clinical and axiographic evaluations. Methods: Mechanical axiography was performed on non-orthodontically treated, temporomandibular disorder (TMD)-free adolescents (12 - 16 years) with Class I (n = 38, 16 boys, 22 girls) or Class II (n = 40, 19 boys, 21 girls) malocclusion. Opening and protrusive movements were measured clinically and axiographically. Intergroup comparisons were evaluated by t-tests. Results: In opening movement, the maximum clinical opening capacity was significantly different (p ${\leq}$ 0.05) between the groups. In protrusive movement, the Class II group had significantly greater maximum clinical protrusion (p < 0.001) and maximum axiographic protrusive length (p < 0.01) than the Class I group. No significant difference in the other opening and protrusive axiographic measurements was observed. Conclusions: TMD-free adolescents with Class II malocclusion have increased protrusive capacity compared with TMD-free adolescents with Class I malocclusion; however, the detected differences could be normal variations during adolescence.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. al-Hadi LA. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders in relation to some occlusal parameters. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:345-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90220-I
  2. McLaughlin RP. Malocclusion and the temporomandibular joint - an historical perspective. Angle Orthod 1988;58:185-91.
  3. Pahkala RH, Laine-Alava MT. Do early signs of orofacial dysfunctions and occlusal variables predict development of TMD in adolescence? J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:737-43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00956.x
  4. Ozkan H, Kucukkeles N. Condylar pathway changes following different treatment modalities. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:477-84. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/25.5.477
  5. Theusner J, Plesh O, Curtis DA, Hutton JE. Axiographic tracings of temporomandibular joint movements. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:209-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90142-B
  6. Zimmer B, Jager A, Kubein-Meesenburg D. Comparison of 'normal' TMJ-function in Class I, II, and III individuals. Eur J Orthod 1991;13:27-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/13.1.27
  7. Thilander B, Rubio G, Pena L, de Mayorga C. Prevalence of temporomandibular dysfunction and its association with malocclusion in children and adolescents: an epidemiologic study related to specified stages of dental development. Angle Orthod 2002;72:146-54.
  8. Thilander B. Temporomandibular joint dysfunction in children. In: Graber LW editor. Orthodontics, State of the Art, Essence of the Science. St. Louis: Mosby; 1986. p. 342-51.
  9. Harper RP. Analysis of temporomandibular joint function after orthognathic surgery using condylar path tracings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:480-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80028-9
  10. Riolo ML, Brandt D, TenHave TR. Associations between occlusal characteristics and signs and symptoms of TMJ dysfunction in children and young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:467-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90228-9
  11. Turasi B, Ari-Demirkaya A, Biren S. Comparison of increased overjet cases and controls: normative data for condylar positions. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:129-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01691.x
  12. Piehslinger E, Celar RM, Horejs T, Slavicek R. Orthopedic jaw movement observations. Part II: The rotational capacity of the mandible. Cranio 1993;11:206-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.1993.11677966
  13. Arat M, Uner O, Gazilerli U. Distribution of Angle Class I, Class II, Class III anomalies. J of Dental Fac of Ankara Univ 1975;2:1-12. Turkish.
  14. Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd ed. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press; 1966. p. 95-110, 159-72.
  15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Int J Nurs Stud 2010;47:931-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.001
  16. Solberg WK, Bibb CA, Nordström BB, Hansson TL. Malocclusion associated with temporomandibular joint changes in young adults at autopsy. Am J Orthod 1986;89:326-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(86)90055-2
  17. Katsavrias EG. Changes in articular eminence inclination during the craniofacial growth period. Angle Orthod 2002;72:258-64.
  18. Katsavrias EG, Halazonetis DJ. Condyle and fossa shape in Class II and Class III skeletal patterns: a morphometric tomographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:337-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.05.024
  19. da Silva CM, Ramos MM, Carrara CF, Dalben Gda S. Oral characteristics of newborns. J Dent Child (Chic) 2008;75:4-6.
  20. Egermark-Eriksson I. Mandibular dysfunction in children and in individuals with dual bite. Swed Dent J Suppl 1982;10:1-45.
  21. Stamm T, Vehring A, Ehmer U, Bollmann F. Computer-aided axiography of asymptomatic individuals with Class II/2. J Orofac Orthop 1998;59:237-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01579168
  22. Ingervall B. Variation of the range of movement of the mandible in relation to facial morphology in young adults. Scand J Dent Res 1971;79:133-40.
  23. Gsellmann B, Schmid-Schwap M, Piehslinger E, Slavicek R. Lengths of condylar pathways measured with computerized axiography (CADIAX) and occlusal index in patients and volunteers. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:146-52. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00198.x
  24. Baqaien MA, Barra J, Muessig D. Computerized axiographic evaluation of the changes in sagittal condylar path inclination with dental and physical development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:88-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.030
  25. Reicheneder C, Gedrange T, Baumert U, Faltermeier A, Proff P. Variations in the inclination of the condylar path in children and adults. Angle Orthod 2009;79:958-63. https://doi.org/10.2319/081108-425.1
  26. Bolt KJ, Orchardson R. Relationship between mouth-opening force and facial skeletal dimensions in human females. Arch Oral Biol 1986;31:789-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(86)90129-9
  27. Dijkstra PU, Hof AL, Stegenga B, de Bont LG. Influence of mandibular length on mouth opening. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:117-22. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00358.x
  28. Pullinger AG, Liu SP, Low G, Tay D. Differences between sexes in maximum jaw opening when corrected to body size. J Oral Rehabil 1987;14:291-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1987.tb00721.x
  29. Kubein-Meesenburg D, Nägerl H, Klamt B. The biomechanical relation between incisal and condylar guidance in man. J Biomech 1988;21:997-1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(88)90247-3
  30. Ogawa T, Koyano K, Suetsugu T. The influence of anterior guidance and condylar guidance on mandibular protrusive movement. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:303-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00479.x

피인용 문헌

  1. Assessment of the Temporomandibular Joint Function in Young Adults without Complaints from the Masticatory System vol.15, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.21665
  2. Antero-posterior mandibular position at different vertical levels for mandibular advancing device design vol.19, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0783-8
  3. Relationship between dentofacial morphology and mandibular movement from rest position to maximum intercuspation in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients vol.8, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4103/ijhas.ijhas_21_19