DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Steady and unsteady flow computation in an elbow draft tube with experimental validation

  • Vu, Thi C. (Andritz-Hydro Ltd.) ;
  • Devals, Christophe (Department of Computer and Software Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal) ;
  • Zhang, Ying (Department of Computer and Software Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal) ;
  • Nennemann, Bernd (Andritz-Hydro Ltd.) ;
  • Guibault, Francois (Department of Computer and Software Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal)
  • Accepted : 2010.12.16
  • Published : 2011.03.31

Abstract

Steady state computations are routinely used by design engineers to evaluate and compare losses in hydraulic components. In the case of the draft tube diffuser, however, experiments have shown that while a significant number of operating conditions can adequately be evaluated using steady state computations, a few operating conditions require unsteady simulations to accurately evaluate losses. This paper presents a study that assesses the predictive capacity of a combination of steady and unsteady RANS numerical computations to predict draft tube losses over the complete range of operation of a Francis turbine. For the prediction of the draft tube performance using k-${\varepsilon}$ turbulence model, a methodology has been proposed to average global performance indicators of steady flow computations such as the pressure recovery factor over an adequate number of periods to obtain correct results. The methodology will be validated using two distinct flow solvers, CFX and OpenFOAM, and through a systematic comparison with experimental results obtained on the FLINDT model draft tube.

Keywords

References

  1. Avellan, F., "Flow Investigation in a Francis Draft Tube: the Flindt Project," Proceedings of the 20th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, 2000, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
  2. Nilsson, H., "Evaluation of OpenFOAM for CFD of Turbulent Flow in Water Turbines," Proceedings of the 23rd IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, 2006, Yokohama, Japan.
  3. Ruprecht, A., T. Helmrich, T. Aschenbrenner, and T. Scherer., "Simulation of vortex rope in a turbine draft tube," Proceeding of the 21st IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, 2002, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  4. Stein, P. et al, "Numerical simulation of the cavitation draft tube vortex in a Francis turbine," Proceeding of the 23rd IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, 2006, Yokohama, Japan
  5. Vu, T.C., F. Guibault, J. Dompierre, P. Labbe, and R. Camarero., "Computation of Fluid Flow in a Model Draft Tube Using Mesh Adaptive Techniques," Proceedings of the 20th Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, 2000, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
  6. Mauri, S., J.L. Kueny, and F. Avellan., "Numerical prediction of the flow in a turbine draft tube," Influence of the boundary conditions, FEDSM00, ASME Fluids Engineering, Division Summer meeting, 2000, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  7. Guibault, F., Y. Zhang, J. Dompierre, and T.C. Vu., "Robust and Automatic CAD-based Structured Mesh Generation for Hydraulic Turbine Component Optimization," Proceedings of the 23rd IAHR Symposium. 2006, Yokohama, Japan.
  8. Allmaras, S. and D. McCarthy., CGNS CFD Standard Interface Data Structures - Version 2.3.8. Cgns Project Group 2004 Available at: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/cgns/sids.
  9. ANSYS CFX - User Manuel, ANSYS CFX Solver, Release 12.1: Theory.

Cited by

  1. An Outlook on the Draft-Tube-Surge Study vol.6, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5293/IJFMS.2013.6.1.033
  2. 3D Casing-Distributor Analysis for Hydraulic Design Application vol.8, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5293/IJFMS.2015.8.3.142
  3. Comparison of steady and unsteady simulation methodologies for predicting no-load speed in Francis turbines vol.8, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5293/IJFMS.2015.8.3.155
  4. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the flow field development through T99 draft tube caused by optimized inlet velocity profiles vol.8, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5293/IJFMS.2015.8.4.283
  5. Unsteady Numerical Simulation of Flow in Draft Tube of a Hydroturbine Operating Under Various Conditions Using a Partially Averaged Navier–Stokes Model vol.137, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029632
  6. A Numerical Study of Francis Turbine Operation at No-Load Condition vol.139, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034422