Clinical and Statistical Analysis in 452 Cases of Nasal Bone Fracture Patients

코뼈 골절 환자 452례에 대한 임상 통계학적 분석

  • Kang, Jae-Hoon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konyang University Hospital) ;
  • Bang, Yoo-Hyun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konyang University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Hae (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konyang University Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Chang-Yong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University)
  • 강재훈 (건양대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 방유현 (건양대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 이용해 (건양대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 최창용 (순천향대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2011.09.09
  • Accepted : 2011.10.17
  • Published : 2011.11.10

Abstract

Purpose: Nasal bone fracture is most common facial bone fracture. The cause of fractures is mainly trauma such as fighting, automobile accident and fall down, and it commonly involves young males. Very frequently nasal bone fractures are associated with other facial injuries such as orbital bone fracture, maxillary bone fracture and nasal septal deformities. Because of various dynamic directions of power are involved, phenomenon of fractures are also various and treatment cannot be simple. Methods: We studied and analyzed retrospectively 452 cases nasal bone fractures from January 2008 to December 2010. Diagnosis were made with physical examination, Nasal bone X-rays, Facial bone CT and 3D facial bone CT. Four surgeons are involved in treatments of these patients and applied different procedure along patient's condition and deformity. We analyzed the cause of nasal bone fractures, deformities, associate injuries and applied surgical technique, and patient's satisfaction rate. In this study, old nasal bone fractures were excluded. Results: Young male group was most commonly sustained nasal bone fracture and physical violence was most common cause of injury. 64 of 452 patient was involved associate injuries of face. Closed reduction were applied 246 cases and C-arm quide reduction were 167 cases and in 20 cases lateral osteotomy were applied. Approximately, more than 80% of the Patients were satisfied with the outcomes. Conclusion: Diagnosis and treatment of nasal bone fractures are considered simple but because of various deformity and associate injuries, treatment is not always simple and universal. Time to time, we face unsatisfied patient after treatment of nasal bone fractures. For obtaining satisfactory result, cause of injury and state of deformities and associate injuries such as nasal septal deformity should be evaluated properly and proper treatment should be applied.

Keywords

References

  1. Hwang K, You SH, Kim SG, Lee SI: Analysis of nasal bone fractures; a six-year study of 503 patients. J Craniofac Surg 17: 261, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200603000-00010
  2. de Lacey GJ, Wignall BK, Hussain S, Reidy JR: The radiology of nasal injuries: problems of interpretation and clinical relevance. Br J Radiol 50: 412, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-50-594-412
  3. Kim JE, Lee SW, Lee JK, Chung SH: Sonographic Evaluation of Nasal Bone Fractures. J Korean Radiol Soc 43: 95, 2000 https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.2000.43.1.95
  4. Nahum AM: The biomechanics of maxillofacial trauma. Clin Plast Surg 2: 59, 1975
  5. Yoon KY, Lee TH: A clinical study of facial bone fractures. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 5: 155, 1978
  6. Yoo JW, Kim SW, Minn KW, Lee YH, Park CG, Kim CW: A clinical analysis of the facial bone fracture: 9 write years survey. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 17: 403, 1990
  7. Kang MS, Choi BC, Kim YH, Woo SH, Jeong JH, Seul JH: An analysis of 1,210 facial bone fractures in 835 patients: 5 year survey. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 25: 598, 1998
  8. Noh BK, Ahn HB, Kim DY, Lee SY, Cho BH: The Classification of Nasal Bone Fractures by CT. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 26: 239, 1999
  9. Chung SH, Park JI, Choe J, Baek SM: Clinical analysis of satisfaction of nasal bone reduction. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 21: 984, 1994
  10. Kang JS: Facial bone fractures. Plastic Surgery, 3rd ed, Koonja, 2004, p 607
  11. Murray JA, Maran AG, Mackenzie IJ, Raab G: Open v closed reduction of the fractured nose. Arch Otolaryngol 110: 797, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1984.00800380027008
  12. Stranc MF, Robertson GA: A classification of injuries of the nasal skeleton. Ann Plast Surg 2: 468, 1979 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-197906000-00004
  13. Park CS, Suh CH, Seok EH, Chung WK, Byun US: Nasal Bone Fractures: Evaluation with Thin-section CP. J Korean Radiol Soc 33: 197, 1995 https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.1995.33.2.197