Analysis of Cleft Lip Nose Deformities Correction in Adults: Detailed Techniques and Comprehensive Review

성인에서의 구순비변형 교정술에 사용된 상세술기의 분석

  • Choi, Chi-Won (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kang, Kyung-Dong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Kyoung-Hoon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Pusan National University) ;
  • Bae, Yong-Chan (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Pusan National University)
  • 최치원 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 강경동 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김경훈 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 배용찬 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2011.08.18
  • Accepted : 2011.10.24
  • Published : 2011.11.10

Abstract

Purpose: Correction of cleft lip nose deformity (CLND) in adulthood is different from one in childhood. Usually correction of CLND is final surgery for adult patient who has cleft lip, so many things have to be considered for correction. Of course, it is different from common rhinoplasty, either. The adult patients can be corrected by complete rhinoplasty with various techniques. To recognize how rhinoplasty techniques was used for correction of CLND, authors analyzed detailed techniques which were selected in the adult patients for 10 years and reviewed comprehensive operation. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted involving 64 patients with CLND who underwent surgery and aged after 14 years at operation between 2001 and 2010. Detailed techniques were investigated by medical record review and classified according to incision, septoplasty, osteotomies, correction of vault, tip plasty and etc. Results: Except one, all patients were performed open rhinoplasty. 49 patients were performed septoplasty. 33 patients were performed complete rhinoplasty with osteotomies. Hump nose correction was performed for 10 patients. Dorsal augmentation was performed for 8 patients. And all patients were performed tip plasty. Tip plasty using suture technique was performed for 58 patients and graft was performed for 48 patients. Conclusion: Correction of CLND in adult is one of the most challenging and varied operation of plastic surgery. In this study, the majority of patients were performed complicated and delicated procedures. It seems to be because patient's demand level has been elevated and rhinoplasty procedures have been advanced. This study may help to planning of CLND correction.

Keywords

References

  1. Akguner M, Barutcu A, Karaca C: Adolescent growth patterns of the bony and cartilaginous framework of the nose: a cephalometric study. Ann Plast Surg 41: 66, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199807000-00012
  2. Mathes SJ: Plastic surgery. 2nd ed, Philadelphia, Elsevier Inc., 2006, p 339
  3. Blair VP: Nasal deformities associated with congenital cleft of the lip. J Am Med Assoc 84: 185, 1925 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1925.02660290029012
  4. Gillies H, Millard, DR: The Principles and art of plastic surgery. Boston, Little Brown, & Co., 1966, p 320
  5. Broadbent TR, Woolf RM: Cleft lip nasal deformity. Ann Plast Surg 12: 216, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198403000-00003
  6. Millard DR Jr, Morovic CG: Primary unilateral cleft nose correction: a ten-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1331, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199810000-00003
  7. McComb H: Primary repair of the bilateral cleft lip nose: a 4-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 94: 37, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199407000-00002
  8. Guyuron B: MOC-PS (SM) CME article: late cleft lip nasal deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 121: 1, 2008
  9. Hwang YJ, Park BY, Lee YH: Total correction of secondary unilateral cleft lip nose deformity. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 15:437, 1988
  10. Ogino Y, Ishida H: Secondary repair of the cleft-lip nose. Ann Plast Surg 4: 469, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198006000-00006
  11. Stal S, Hollier L: Correction of secondary deformities of the cleft lip nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 109: 1386, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200204010-00028