DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical Outcomes of Gastrectomy after Incomplete EMR/ESD

  • Lee, Hye-Jeong (Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jang, You-Jin (Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Han (Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Sung-Soo (Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Seung-Heum (Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jong-Jae (Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Seung-Joo (Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Suk (Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Mok, Young-Jae (Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2011.06.10
  • 심사 : 2011.09.06
  • 발행 : 2011.09.30

초록

Purpose: Endoscopic resection is widely accepted as standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) without lymph node metastasis. The procedure is minimally invasive, safe, and convenient. However, surgery is sometimes needed after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)/endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) due to perforation, bleeding, or incomplete resection. We evaluated the role of surgery after incomplete resection. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively studied 29 patients with gastric cancer who underwent a gastrectomy after incomplete EMR/ESD from 2006 to 2010 at Korea University Hospital. Results: There were 13 incomplete resection cases, seven bleeding cases, three metachronous lesion cases, three recurrence cases, two perforation cases, and one lymphatic invasion case. Among the incomplete resection cases, a positive vertical margin was found in 10, a positive lateral margin in two, and a positive vertical and lateral margin in one case. Most cases (9/13) were diagnosed as mucosal tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography, but only three cases were confirmed as mucosal tumors on final pathology. The positive residual tumor rate was two of 13. The lymph node metastasis rate was three of 13. All lymph node metastasis cases were submucosal tumors with positive lymphatic invasion and no residual tumor in the gastrectomy specimen. No cases of recurrence were observed after curative resection. Conclusions: A gastrectomy is required for patients with incomplete resection following EMR/ESD due to the risk of residual tumor and lymph node metastasis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma - 2nd English edition -. Gastric Cancer 1998;1:10-24.
  2. Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, Shirao K, Yamaguchi H, Saito D, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut 2001;48:225-229. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.48.2.225
  3. Okamura T, Tsujitani S, Korenaga D, Haraguchi M, Baba H, Hiramoto Y, et al. Lymphadenectomy for cure in patients with early gastric cancer and lymph node metastasis. Am J Surg 1988;155:476-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80116-8
  4. Sue-Ling HM, Martin I, Griffi th J, Ward DC, Quirke P, Dixon MF, et al. Early gastric cancer: 46 cases treated in one surgical department. Gut 1992;33:1318-1322. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.33.10.1318
  5. Gotoda T. Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2007;10:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-006-0408-1
  6. Gotoda T, Yanagisawa A, Sasako M, Ono H, Nakanishi Y, Shimoda T, et al. Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric Cancer 2000;3:219-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011720
  7. Soetikno R, Kaltenbach T, Yeh R, Gotoda T. Endoscopic mucosal resection for early cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:4490-4498. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.19.935
  8. Korenaga D, Orita H, Maekawa S, Maruoka A, Sakai K, Ikeda T, et al. Pathological appearance of the stomach after endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 1997;84:1563-1566. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800841120
  9. Tsunada S, Ogata S, Ohyama T, Ootani H, Oda K, Kikkawa A, et al. Endoscopic closure of perforations caused by EMR in the stomach by application of metallic clips. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:948-951. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(03)70051-0
  10. Nakajima T, Oda I, Gotoda T, Hamanaka H, Eguchi T, Yokoi C, et al. Metachronous gastric cancers aft er endoscopic resection: how eff ective is annual endoscopic surveillance? Gastric Cancer 2006;9:93-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-006-0372-9
  11. Takekoshi T, Fujii A, Takagi K, Baba Y, Kato Y, Yanaghisawa A. The indication for endoscopic double snare polypectomy of gastric lesions (in Japanese with English abstract). Stomach and Intestine 1988;23:387-398.
  12. Song KY, Hyung WJ, Kim HH, Han SU, Cho GS, Ryu SW, et al. Is gastrectomy mandatory for all residual or recurrent gastric cancer following endoscopic resection? A large-scale Korean multi-center study. J Surg Oncol 2008;98:6-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21074
  13. Nagano H, Ohyama S, Fukunaga T, Seto Y, Fujisaki J, Yamaguchi T, et al. Indications for gastrectomy aft er incomplete EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2005;8:149-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-005-0328-5
  14. Chang JH, Lee IS, You CR, Nam KW, Kwon JH, Suh JP, et al. Re-endoscopic mucosal resection for a residual or locally recurrent gastric lesion after endoscopic mucosal resection. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2007;35:6-13.
  15. Rosch T. Endosonographic staging of gastric cancer: a review of literature results. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1995;5:549-557.
  16. Polkowski M, Palucki J, Wronska E, Szawlowski A, Nasierowska- Guttmejer A, Butruk E. Endosonography versus helical computed tomography for locoregional staging of gastric cancer. Endoscopy 2004;36:617-623. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-814522
  17. Jee YS, Hwang SH, Rao J, Park DJ, Kim HH, Lee HJ, et al. Safety of extended endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection following the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association treatment guidelines. Br J Surg 2009;96:1157-1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6686
  18. Ishikawa S, Togashi A, Inoue M, Honda S, Nozawa F, Toyama E, et al. Indications for EMR/ESD in cases of early gastric cancer: relationship between histological type, depth of wall invasion, and lymph node metastasis. Gastric Cancer 2007;10:35-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-006-0407-2
  19. Yanai H, Matsumoto Y, Harada T, Nishiaki M, Tokiyama H, Shigemitsu T, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopy for staging depth of invasion in early gastric cancer: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46:212-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(97)70088-9
  20. Botet JF, Lightdale CJ, Zauber AG, Gerdes H, Winawer SJ, Urmacher C, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT. Radiology 1991;181:426-432.
  21. Akahoshi K, Misawa T, Fujishima H, Chijiiwa Y, Maruoka A, Ohkubo A, et al. Preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer by endoscopic ultrasound. Gut 1991;32:479-482. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.32.5.479
  22. Habermann CR, Weiss F, Riecken R, Honarpisheh H, Bohnacker S, Staedtler C, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology 2004;230:465-471. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2302020828
  23. Nakamura T, Tajika M, Kawai H, Yokoi T, Yatabe Y, Nakamura S, et al. Is endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) needed for deciding the indication for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of early gastric carcinoma? Th e signifi cance of diagnosis of the invasive depth and lymph node metastasis of gastric carcinoma by EUS. Stomach Intestine 2005;40:465-467.

피인용 문헌

  1. Metachronous liver and bone metastasis from small early gastric carcinoma without lymph node involvement: A case report vol.1, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2012.50
  2. Afferent loop obstruction following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Billroth-II gastrojejunostomy vol.84, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.84.5.281
  3. Evidence-based review of the management of early gastric cancer vol.1, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/got016
  4. Factors that affect surgery after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer patients vol.9, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14216/kjco.13021
  5. Is There an Optimal Surgery Time After Endoscopic Resection in Early Gastric Cancer? vol.21, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3299-5
  6. A Case of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection in a Patient with Gastric High-Grade Dysplasia Unsuitable for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection vol.47, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2014.47.4.353
  7. Clinical outcomes of early gastric cancer with lymphovascular invasion or positive vertical resection margin after endoscopic submucosal dissection vol.29, pp.9, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3973-0
  8. Aberrant metastatic behavior and particular features of early gastric cancer vol.123, pp.12, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12469
  9. Can further gastrectomy be avoided in patients with incomplete endoscopic resection? vol.31, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5550-9
  10. Safety and effectiveness of endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasia within 2 days’ hospital stay vol.98, pp.32, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000016578
  11. Additional laparoscopic gastrectomy after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: A single-center experience vol.25, pp.29, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i29.3996
  12. Prevalence and risk factors for lymph node metastasis after noncurative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.55, pp.8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-020-01685-9