Quality Indicators of End-of-Life Cancer Care from the Family Members' Perspective in Korea

호스피스 임상 질 지표에 대한 보호자의 동의정도와 이와 관련된 인자

  • Kim, Hyo-Min (Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Youn, Chang-Ho (Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Ko, Hae-Jin (Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University)
  • 김효민 (경북대학교 의학전문대학원 가정의학교실) ;
  • 윤창호 (경북대학교 의학전문대학원 가정의학교실) ;
  • 고혜진 (경북대학교 의학전문대학원 가정의학교실)
  • Received : 2010.11.11
  • Accepted : 2011.04.28
  • Published : 2011.06.01

Abstract

Purpose: The Assessing Care Of Vulnerable Elders project has developed indicators for the quality of the end-of-life (EOL) care. However, family members of cancer patients may have a different view on the quality indicators (QIs) established by health care experts. We evaluated the QIs from the family members' perspective. Methods: The information used in this study was gathered by surveying family members of cancer patients who were admitted to the inpatient hospice ward in Korea. A cross-sectional anonymous questionnaire was distributed to 120 potential respondents from July to October 2009. We included 69 responses in this study (effective response rate, 57.5%). Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS for Win ver. 14.0, with independent t-test and Pearson's chi-square test. Results: Among QIs for good hospice care, families agreed the most on "Medical examination by the palliative care team or specialist" (88.4%) and "Dying in the family's presence" (88.4%). They agreed the least on "Discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation with patients" (15.9%). Among QIs for bad hospice care, "Occurrence of fall or pressure ulcer are undesirable" showed the highest agreement rate (94.2%). The lowest agreement rate was 11.6% on "Dying in the hospital is undesirable." In addition, women, patients who were aware of their prognoses, and people with a high socioeconomic status tended to agree more on the QIs. Conclusion: Patients' families did not agree on some of the QIs recommended by previous studies. Family members' characteristics were related to their opinions on QIs.

목적: ACOVE project에서는 말기 치료의 질 평가를 위한 임상질지표를 개발하였다. 그러나 말기 치료에 대하여 의료전문가들의 의견을 반영하여 만든 임상질지표와 보호자들의 의견은 실제로 다를 수 있다. 따라서 호스피스 치료 질에 대한 보호자들의 인식 정도를 파악하기 위해 본 연구를 시행하였다. 방법: 2009년 7월부터 10월까지 총 4개월간 경북대학교 병원과 대구 보훈병원의 호스피스 병동에 입원해 있는 환자의 보호자를 대상으로 익명의 횡단면 질문지 조사(cross-sectional anonymous questionnaire)를 시행하였다. 총 120명을 선정하고 이 중 모든 질문에 성실히 답한 69명을 최종대상자로 하였다. 통계분석은 SPSS WIN ver. 14.0을 이용하여 independent t-test와 Pearson's chi-square test를 시행하였다. 결과: 좋은 임상질지표 중 가장 동의율이 높은 항목은 '완화의학 팀이나 완화의학 전문가에 의한 의학적 진찰'과 '가족들이 지켜보는 앞에서의 임종' 이었으며 이 항목들은 88.4%의 보호자가 동의하였다. 반면에 낮은 동의율을 보인 항목은 '환자와 심폐소생술에 대해 논하는 것' 으로 15.9%가 동의하였다. 나쁜 임상질지표 중 동의율이 높은 항목은 '낙상이나 욕창이 발생하는 것은 바람직하지 않다' 라는 항목이었으며 94.2%의 보호자가 동의하였고 가장 낮은 동의율을 보인 것으로는 '병원에서 임종하시는 것은 바람직하지 않다'라는 항목으로 11.6%가 동의하였다. 그리고 동의를 많이 한 그룹일수록 여자의 비율, 환자가 자신의 예후를 인지한 비율, 경제 수준이 높은 사람의 비율이 높았다. 결론: 본 연구에서는 이전 여러 연구에서 임상질지표로 권유되어진 항목들에 대한 보호자들의 동의율이 낮은 항목들이 있었으며 일부 항목들의 동의율과 보호자들의 특성이 관련이 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi KS, You CH, Lee KH, Kim CY, Heo DS, Yun YH. Comparison of medical care cost between hospice care and conventional care in the last year of life. KJHPA 2005;15(2):1-15.
  2. Yun YH, Kim SH, Lee KM, Park SM, Lee CG, Choi YS, et al. Patient-reported assessment of quality care at end of life: development and validation of Quality Care Questionnaire-End of Life (QCQ-EOL). Eur J Cancer 2006;42:2310-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.010
  3. Yun YH. Hospice care for improving terminally ill patients' quality of life. J Korean Med Assoc 2008;51:530-5. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2008.51.6.530
  4. Rosenfeld K, Wenger NS. Measuring quality in end-of-life care. Clin Geriatr Med 2000;16:387-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0690(05)70063-X
  5. Tilden VP, Tolle S, Drach L, Hickman S. Measurement of quality of care and quality of life at the end of life. Gerontologist 2002;42 Spec No 3:71-80.
  6. Earle CC, Park ER, Lai B, Weeks JC, Ayanian JZ, Block S. Identifying potential indicators of the quality of end-of-life cancer care from administrative data. J Clin Oncol 2003;21(6):1133-8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.03.059
  7. Ferrell BR, Von Gunten C, Meier D. Voluntary consensus care standards. Proceedings of the 2004 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 2004. New Orleans, Louisiana; 2004: (Abstract # 8073) / Poster.
  8. Wenger NS, Rosenfeld K. Quality indicators for end-of-life care in vulnerable elders. Ann Intern Med 2001;135(8 Pt 2):677-85. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-135-8_Part_2-200110161-00006
  9. Mainz J. Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15(6):523-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzg081
  10. Veillard J, Champagne F, Klazinga N, Kazandjian V, Arah OA, Guisset AL A performance assessment framework for hospitals: the WHO regional office for Europe PATH project. Int J Qual Health Care 2005;17:487-96. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzi072
  11. Wenger NS, Shekelle PG. Assessing care of vulnerable elders: ACOVE project overview. Ann Intern Med 2001;135(8 Pt 2):642-6. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-135-8_Part_2-200110161-00002
  12. Miyashita M, Morita T, Ichikawa T, Sato K, Shima Y, Uchitomi Y. Quality indicators of end-of-life cancer care from the bereaved family members' perspective in Japan. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;37:1019-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.05.015
  13. Yun YH. Hospice-Palliative Care and Social Strategies for Improvement of the Quality of End-of-Life. J Korean Med Assoc 2009;52:880-5. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2009.52.9.880
  14. Yun YH, Lee CG, Kim SY, Lee SW, Heo DS, Kim JS, et al. The attitudes of cancer patients and their families toward the disclosure of terminal illness. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:307-14.
  15. Korea National Statistical Office. 2005 Annual report on the cause of death statistics. Deajeon:Korea National Statistical Office; 2006.
  16. YH, Rhee YS, Nam SY, Chae YM, Heo DS, Lee SW, et al. Public attitudes toward dying with dignity and hospice palliative care. Korean J Hosp Palliat Care 2004;7:17-28.
  17. Choi KS, Chae YM, Lee CG, Kim SY, Lee SW, Heo DS, et al. Factors influencing preferences for place of terminal care and of death among cancer patients and their families in Korea. Support Care Cancer 2005;13:565-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-005-0809-4
  18. Yun YH, Lim MK, Choi KS, Rhee YS. Predictors associated with the place of death in a country with increasing hospital deaths. Palliat Med 2006;20:455-61. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269216306pm1129oa