Industrial Engineering and Management Systems

  • 제10권2호
  • /
  • Pages.140-153
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1598-7248(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6473(eISSN)
대한산업공학회 (Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Numerical Kano Model for Compliance Customer Needs with Product Development

  • Rashid, Md. Mamunur (Faculty, Bangladesh Institute of Management) ;
  • Tamaki, Jun'ichi (Kitami Institute of Technology) ;
  • Sharif Ullah, A.M.M. (Kitami Institute of Technology) ;
  • Kubo, Akihiko (Kitami Institute of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2010.07.09
  • 심사 : 2011.02.28
  • 발행 : 2011.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Functional form and dysfunctional form of Kano model are considered as customer need regarding attribute of product. Both functional and dysfunctional forms are: Like, Must-be Neutral, Live-with and Dislike. The answers of customer regarding a product of functional and dysfunctional forms have been applied for selection of customer needs regarding product attribute (Kano evaluation). Filling.up and returning the Questionnaires by the individuals are essential for determining Kano evaluation. But many Questionnaires have not been returned in that case. Moreover, many possible consumers could not get opportunity to fill-up questionnaire. These uncertain or unknown consumers' opinions are also essential for product development. The choices of Kano evaluations have been outlined by: Attractive, One-dimensional, Must-be, Indifferent and Reverse. In this study, choices of evaluation of unknown customer are considered uniform cumulative vector probability (scenario 1). This study is based on the Monte Carlo simulation method, concept of probability and Kano model. This model has also been tested for its soundness and found fairly consistent including existing Kano model (scenario 2) and case survey for headlight of bicycle (scenario 3).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Autonsson, E. K. and Otto, K. N. (1995), Imprecision in Engineering design, ASME Journal of Mechanical of Mechanical Design, 117, 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2836465
  2. Baek, S. I., Paik S. K., and Yoo, W. S. (2009), Understanding Key Attributes in Mobile Service: Kano Model Approach, Human Interface and the Management of Information, Book Chapter, 355-364.
  3. Berger, C., Blauth, R. Boger, D. Bolster, C. Burchill, G. Du-Mouchel, W. Pouliot, F. Richter, R. Rubinoff, A. Shen, D. Timko, M., and Walden, D. (1993), Kano's methods for understanding customerdefined quality, The Center for Quality Management Journal, 2, 2-36.
  4. Browning, T. R. (2003), On Customer Value and Improvement and Improvement in Product Development Processes, Systems Engineering, 6, 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.10034
  5. Baxter, D., Gao, J., Case, K., Harding, J., Young, B., Cochrane, S., and Dani S. (2007), An Engineering Design Knowledge Reuse Methodology using Process Modeling, Research in Engineering Design, 18, 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-007-0028-8
  6. Burlikowska, M. D. and Szewieczek, D. (2009), The Poka-Method as an Improving Quality Tool of Carrillat Operations in the Process, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 36, 95-102.
  7. Chen, C. C. and Chuang, M. C. (2008), Integrating the Kano model into a robust design approach to enhance customer satisfaction with product design, International Journal of Production Economics, 114, 667-681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.02.015
  8. Cochran, D. S., Eversheim, W. Kubin, G., and Sesterhenn, M. L. (2000), The Application of Axiomatic Design and Lean Management Principles in the Scope of Production System Segmentation, The International Journal of Production Research, 38, 1377-1396. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075400188906
  9. Chen, C. H. Khoo, L. P., and Yan, W. (2005), PDCS-A Product Definition and Customization System for Product Concept Development, Expert Systems with Applications, 28, 591-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2004.12.040
  10. Coolen, F. P. A., Troffaes, M. C. M., and Augustin, T. (2010), Imprecise Probability, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, spring 2010, .
  11. Dean, P. R., Tu, Y. L., and Xue, D. (2008), A Framework for Generating Product Production, Information for mass customization, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 38, 1244-1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1171-0
  12. Fagerström, B. and Olsson L.-E. (2002), Knowledge Management in Collaborative Product Development, Systems Engineering, 5, 274-285. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.10027
  13. Fujita, K. and Matsuo T. (2006), Survey and Analysis of Utilization of Tools and Methods in Product Development, Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Series C, 72, 290-297 (In Japanese). https://doi.org/10.1299/kikaic.72.290
  14. Fuchs, M. and Weiermair, K. (2004), Destination benchmarking: an indicator-system's potential for exploring guest satisfaction, Journal of travel Research, 42, 212-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287503258827
  15. Frey, D. D., Jahangir, E., and Engelhardt, F. (2000), the Information Content of Decoupled Designs, Research in Engineering Design, 12, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001630050025
  16. Guenov, M. D., Barker, S. G., Hunter, C. Horsfield, I., and Smith, N. C. (2006), An integrated approach to customer elicitation for the aerospace sector, Systems Engineering, 9, 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20045
  17. Green, G. and Mamtami, G. (2004), An Integrated Decision Making Model for Evaluation of Concept Design, Acta Polytechnica, 44, 62-65.
  18. Gronroos, C. (1984), A service quality model and its marketing implications, European Journal of Marketing, 18, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004784
  19. Hintersteiner, J. D. (2000), Addressing Changing Customer Needs by Adapting Design Requirements, Proceedings of First International Conference on Axiomatic Design, June 21-23, MA, USA.
  20. Haapaniemi, T. and Seppanen M. (2008), Antecedents and Key Success Factors in Adoption of Consumer Electronics Industry Innovations, Euro MOT 2008 Proceedings, International Association for Management Of Technology, September 17-19, Nice, France.
  21. Handfield, R. B. and Steininger, W. (2005), An Assessment of Manufacturing Customer Pain Points: Challenges for Researchers, Journal of Supply Chain Forum, 6, 6-15.
  22. Jiao, J., Simpson, T. W., and Siddique, Z. (2007), Product Family Design and Platform-Based Product Development: A State of the Art Review, Special issue on Product Family Design and Platform- Product Development, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 18, 5-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-007-0003-2
  23. Kai, Y. (2007), Voice of the Customer: Capture and Analysis, MacGraw-Hill, New York, 2007.
  24. Kano, N. Seraku, N. Takahashi, F., and Tsuji, S. (1984), Attractive quality and must-be quality, Hinshitsu, 14, 3948, (In Japanese).
  25. Krishnan, V. and Ulrich, K. T. (2001), Product Development Decisions: A review of the Literature, Management Science, 47, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.1.1.10668
  26. Li, Y., Tang, J., Luo, X., and Xu, J. (2009), An integrated method of rough set, Kano's model and AHP for rating customer requirements' final importance, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 7045-7053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.036
  27. Matt, D. T. (2009), Reducing the Time Dependent Complexity in Organizational Systems using the Concept of Functional Periodicity, The Fifth International Conference on Axiomatic Design, March 25-27, 2009, Campus de, Caparica, Portugal.
  28. Matzler, K. and Hinterhuber, H. H. (1998), How to Make Product Development Projects More Successful by Integrating Kano's Model of Customer Satisfaction into Quality Function Deployment, Technovation, 18, 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00072-2
  29. Meyer, M. H. (1992), The Product Family and the Dynamics of Core Capability, Working Paper, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA, USA.
  30. Mannion, M. and Kaindle, H. (2008), Using parameters and discriminant for product line requirements, Systems Engineering, 11, 61-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20086
  31. Nielsen, P. H. and Wenzel, H. (2002), Integration of Environmental Aspects in Product Development: A Stepwise Procedure Based on Quantitative Life Cycle Assessment, Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00038-5
  32. Oppenheim, B. W. (2004), Lean Product Development Flow, Systems Engineering, 7, 352-376.
  33. Ong, S. K., Nee, A. Y. C., and Xu, Q. L. (2008), Design Reuse in Product Development Modeling and Analysis and Optimization, Series on Manufacturing systems and Technology, 4, books.google.com.
  34. Panchal, J. H., Fernandez, M.G., Paredis, C. J. J., Allen, J. K., and Mistree, F. (2004), Designing Design Processes in Product Lifecycle Management: Research Issues and Strategies, 2004, ASME Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2004, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  35. Parasuraman, A., Zeithamal V. A., and Berry L. L. (1985), A conceptual model of service quality and implications for future research, Journal of Marketing, 49, 41-50.
  36. Pedersen, K., Emblemsvag, J., Bailey, R., Allen, J. K., and Mistree, F. (2000), Validating Design Methods and Research: The Validation Square, Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences September 10-, Baltimore.
  37. Prasad B. B. (2000), Building Blocks for a Decision- Based Integrated Product Development and System Realization Process, Systems Engineering, 5, 123-144.
  38. Raharjo, H., Brombacher, A. C. Goh, T. N., and Bergman, B. (2009), On integrating Kano's model dynamics into QFD for multiple product design, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, in press, DOI: 10.1002/qre.1065.
  39. Rashid, M. M., Ullah, A. M. M. S., Tamaki, J., and Kubo, A. (2010), A Virtual Customer Needs System for Product Development, Annual Proceedings of Japan Society of Precision Engineering, Paper 307, September 4.
  40. Rashid, M. M., Ullah, A. M. M. S., Tamaki, J., and Kubo, A. (2010), A Numerical Method for Customer Need Analysis, Proceedings of the 13 Annual Paper Meeting Conference on Mechanical Engineering APM 2010, MED, IEB, Bangladesh, paper No.MED-12 September 25.
  41. Rashid, M. M., Ullah, A. M. M. S., Tamaki, J., and Kubo, A. (2010), A proposed computer system on Kano Model for new product development and in novation aspect: A case study is conducted by an attractive attribute of automobile, International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 2(9), 1-12.
  42. Rashid, M. M., Ullah, A. M. M. S., Tamaki, J., and Kubo, A. (2010), A Kano Model based Computer System for Respondents determination: Customer Needs Analysis for Product development Aspects, Management Science and Engineering, 4(4), 70-74.
  43. Rashid, M. M. (2010), A Simulating functional and dysfunctional answer from given Kano evaluation for Product Development, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial and Energy Engineering 2010, 23-24, December, 2010, Khulna, Bangladesh, paper No. MIE10-040, 1-6.
  44. Rashid, M. M. (2010), A review of state-of-Art on Kano Model for Research Direction, International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 2(12), 7481-7490.
  45. Sushkov, V. V., Mars, N. J. I., and Wognum, P. M. (1995), Introduction to TIPS: A theory for Creative Design, Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 9, 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0954-1810(95)00002-Z
  46. Sivaloganathan, S. Shahin, T. M. M. Cross, M., and Lawrence, M. (2000), A Hybrid Systematic and Conventional Approach for the Design and Development of a Product: A Case Study, Design Studies, 21, 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00004-6
  47. Sireli, Y., Kauffmann, P., and Ozan, E. (2007), Integration of Kano's Model into QFD for Multiple Product Design, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54, 380-390.
  48. Ullah, A. M. M. S. and Tamaki, J. (2010), Analysis of Kano-Model-Based Customer Needs for Product Development, System Engineering, Accepted March 23, 2010, DOI 10.1002/sys.20168.
  49. Ullah, A. M. M. S. and Tamaki, J. (2009), Uncertain Customer Needs Analysis for Product Development: A Kano Model Perspective, Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Sapporo, Japan.
  50. Willcox, K. and Wekayama, S. (2003), Simultaneous Optimization of a Multiple-Aircraft Family, Journal of Aircraft, 41, 616-622.
  51. Weck, O. L. D., Suh, E. S., and Chang, D. (2005), Product Family Strategy and Platform Design Optimization, Special issue on Product Family Design, MIT Publications, USA.
  52. Xu, Q., Jiao, R. J., Yang, X. Helander, M., Khalid, H. M., and Opperud, A. (2009), An Analytical Kano Model for Customer Need Analysis, Design Studies, 30, 87-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.07.001

피인용 문헌

  1. A Kano Model Based Linguistic Application for Customer Needs Analysis vol.3, pp.1847-9790, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5772/50934
  2. A Possibilistic Approach for Aggregating Customer Opinions in Product Development vol.4, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/systems4020017