참고문헌
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Avraamidou, L., & Osborne, J (2009). The role of narrative in communicating science, International Journal of Science Education, 31(12), 1683-1707. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802380695
- Barker, C., & Galasinski, D. (2001). Cultural studies and discourse analysis: A dialogue on language and identity. London: Sage.
- Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 17, 1-21.
- Cho, S., Cho, E., & Yoon, J. (2009). Public perception toward life science issues. Social Science Research, 20(1), 169-187.
- Davies, S. R. (2008). Constructing communication: Talking to scientists about talking to the public. Science Communication, 29, 413-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008316222
- Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
- Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48 (6), 781-795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325
- Gilbert, N., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists'discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Glasson, G. E., & Bentley, M. L. (2000). Epistemological undercurrents in scientists' reporting of research to teachers. Science Education, 84(4), 469-485. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200007)84:4<469::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-Q
- Harre, R., Brockmeier, J., Muhlhauser, P. (1999). Greenspeak: a study of environmental discourse. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
- Kelly, G. J., Chen, C., & Crawford, T. (1998). Methodological considerations for studying science-in-the-making in educational settings. Research in Science Education, 28(1), 23-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461640
- Kelly, G. J. (2007). Inquiry, activity, and epistemic practice. In R. A. Duschl & R. Grandy (Eds) Establishing a consensus agenda for K-12 science inquiry (99-117). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
- Kolsto, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
- Levinson, R. (2009). The manufacture of aluminium and the rubbish-pickers of Rio: Building interlocking narratives . School Science Review, 90(333), 119-124.
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications.
- Martin, B.E., & Brouwer, W. (1991). The sharing of personal science and the narrative element in science education. Science Education, 75, 707-722. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750610
- Michael, M. (1996). Constructing Identities, London: Sage.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Mills, J. (2001). Self-construction through conversation and narrative in interviews. Educational Review, 53(3), 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910120085883
- Milne, C. (1998). Philosophically correct science stories? Examining the implications of heroic science stories for school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199802)35:2<175::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-P
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
- Norris, S. P., Guilbert, S. M., Smith, M. L., Hakimelahi, S., & Phillips L. M. (2005). A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science. Science Education, 89, 535 563. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20063
- Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What "ideas-aboutscience" should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692 720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10105
- Rudolph, J. L. (2003). Portraying epistemology: School science in historical context. Science Education, 87(1), 64 79. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1055
- Samarapungavan, A. Westby. E. L., & Bodner, G. M. (2006). Contextual epistemic development in science: A comparison of chemistry students and research chemists. Science Education, 90 (3), 468-495. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20111
- Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G. & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 8(4), 610-645.
- Schwartz, R., & Lederman, N. (2008). What Scientists Say: Scientists' views of nature of science and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 727-771. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701225801
- Solomon, J. (2002). Science stories and science texts: what can they do for our students? Studies in Science Education, 37(2), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560178
- Waterton, C., Wynne, B., Grove-White, R., & Mansfield, T. (2001). Scientists reflect on science: Scientists'perspectives on contemporary science and environmental policy. Centre for the Study of Environmental Change, Lancaster University, Lancaster.
- Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: biographic narrative and semistructured methods. London: Sage.
- Wong, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2010). More from the Horse's Mouth: What scientists say about science as a social practice. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1431-1463. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903104465
- Yore, L. D., Hand, B. M., & Florence, M. K. (2004). Scientists' views of science, models of writing, and science writing practices Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 338-369. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20008