DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of an Effective Strategy to Teach Evolution

  • Received : 2011.03.10
  • Accepted : 2011.05.06
  • Published : 2011.05.31

Abstract

This study proposes a new instructional strategy and corresponding materials designed from various alternative frameworks to help students understand evolution as a biologically acceptable theory. Biology teachers have normally taught the evolutionary mechanism by means of comparing Lamarckism with natural selection. In this study, a new instructional strategy in which the Lamarckian explanation is first excluded because Lamarckism is known to be subsumed in a learner's cognitive structure as a strong preconception of evolution is suggested for teaching evolution. After mutation theory is introduced, Darwinism including natural selection is explained separately during the next class hour. Corresponding instructional materials that aid student understanding of the evolutionary mechanism were developed using recently published articles on human genetic traits as scientific evolutionary evidence instead of the traditional evolutionary subject matter, giraffe neck. Evolutionary evidence from human genetic traits allows students to exclude anthropocentric thoughts effectively and raise concern for the phenomenon of evolution positively. The administered instructional strategy and materials in this research improved student conception, concern, and belief of evolution and it is believed that they helped students understand the evolutionary mechanism effectively.

Keywords

References

  1. Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D. & Hanesian, H. (1978). Education Psychology; A cognitive view (2nd ed). NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  2. Besterman, H. & La Velle, L. B. (2007). Using human evolution to teach evolutionary theory. Journal of Biological Education, 41(2), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656066
  3. Bishop, B. A. & Anderson, C. W.(1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415-427. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270503
  4. Bizzo, N. M. V. (1994). From Down house landlord to Brazilian high school students: What has happened to evolutionary knowledge on the way? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 537-556.
  5. Brumby, M. (1979). Problems in learning the concept of natural selection. Journal of Biological Education, 13(2), 119-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1979.9654240
  6. Brumby, M. N. (1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science Education, 68, 493-503. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730680412
  7. Dagher, Z. R. & Boujaoude, S. (2005). Students' perceptions of the nature of evolutionary theory. Science Education, 89(3), 378-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20054
  8. Demastes, S., Good, R. & Peebles, P. (1995). Students; conceptual ecologies and the process of conceptual change in evolution. Science Education, 79(6), 637-666. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790605
  9. Demastes, S., Good, R., & Peebles, P. (1996). Patterns of conceptual change in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 407-431. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199604)33:4<407::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-W
  10. Duveen, J. & Solonom, J. (1994). The great evolution: Use of role-play in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 575-582.
  11. Grose, E. C. & Simpson, R. D. (1982). Attitude Measures; Biology; College Science; College Students; Evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660190103
  12. Ha, M. & Cha, H. (2006). Analysis of Misconceptualizations regarding Evolution Originating from TV Animation and Science Books for Children. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(4) 352-362.(in Korean)
  13. Ha, M. & Cha, H. (2007). A Qualitative Cross-Sectional Study on Explanation about Evolution Mechanism. The Korea Journal of Biological Education, 35(1), 106-116.(in Korean)
  14. Ha, M., Lee, J. & Cha, H. (2006). A Cross- Sectional Study of Students` Conceptions on Evolution and Characteristics of Concept Formation about It in Terms of the Subjects: Human, Animals and Plants. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26(7), 813-825.(in Korean)
  15. Hewson, P. W. & Hewson, M. G. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of instruction. Instructional Science, 13(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051837
  16. Hibish, T. & Goodwin, T. M. (1994). A simple demonstration of natural selection in the wild using the common dandelion. The American Biology Teacher, 56, 286-289. https://doi.org/10.2307/4449822
  17. Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1995). Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Science Education, 79(2), 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790203
  18. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (1992). Thinking about theories or thinking with theories?: a classroom study with natural selection. International Journal of Science Education. 14(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140106
  19. Kennedy, D., Moore, J., Alberts, B., Scott, E., Ezell, D., Singer, M., Goldsmith, T., Smith, M., Hazen, R., Suiter, M., Lederman, N., Wood, R. & McInerney, J. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC.: National Academy Press.
  20. Law, W. & Salick, J. (2005). Human-induced dwarfing of Himalayan snow lotus, Saussurea laniceps (Asteraceae). PNAS, 102(29), 10218- 10220. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502931102
  21. Lawson, A. E. & Thompson, L. D. (1988). Formal reasoning ability and misconceptions concerning genetics and natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 733-746. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660250904
  22. Mayr, E. (1997). This is Biology: The Science of the Living World. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press; Harvard University Press.
  23. Mekel-Bobrov, N., Gilbert, S. L., Evans, P. D., Vallender, E. J., Anderson, J. R., Hudson, R. R., Tishkoff, S. A. & Lahn, B. T. (2005). Ongoing adaptive evolution of ASPM, a brain size determinant in Homo sapiens. Science, 309(5741), 1720-1722. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1116815
  24. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC. National Academy Press.
  25. National Science Teachers Association (2003). NSTA position statement: The teaching of evolution. Arlington, VA. Wilson Boulevard.
  26. Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(5), 699-723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9062-7
  27. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W. & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66 (2), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
  28. Rutledge, M. L. & Mitchell, M. A. (2002). Knowledge structure, acceptance, and teaching of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 64(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/4451231
  29. Settlage, J. (1994). Conceptions of natural selection; A snapshot of the sense making process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 449-457.
  30. Sinatra, G. M., Sherry, A., McConaughy, F. & Demastes, J, W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students'understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 510-528. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10087
  31. Sinclair, A., Pendarvis, M. P. & Baldwin, B. (1997). The relationship between college zoology students'beliefs about evolutionary theory and religion. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30, 118-125.
  32. Smith, M. U. (1994). Counterpoint: Belief understanding and the teaching of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 591-597.
  33. Stedman, H. H., Kozyak, B. W., Nelson, A., Thesier, D. M., Su, L. T., Low, D. W., Bridges, C. R., Shrager, J. B., Purvis, N. M. & Mitchell, M. A. (2004). Myosin gene mutation correlates with anatomical changes in the human lineage. Nature, 428, 415-418. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02358
  34. Swarts, F. A., Anderson, O. R. & Swetz, F. J. (1994). Evolution in secondary school biology textbooks of the PRC, USA, and the latter stages of USSR. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 475-505.
  35. Thanukos, A. (2002). Acceptance of evolutionary explanation as they are applied to plants, animals, and humans. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

Cited by

  1. Analysis of Barrier Factors on the Learning about Evolution According to Religious Belief vol.43, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2015.43.4.355