Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater (상하수도학회지)

The Korean Society of Water and Wastewater (대한상하수도학회)
권호 표지

A Comparison of Substrate Removal Kinetics of Anaerobic Reactor systems treating Palm Oil Mill Effluent

Palm Oil Mill Effluent 처리 시 Anaerobic Hybrid Reactor의 기질 제거 Kinetics 비교

  • 오대양 (한양대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 신창하 (한양대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 김태훈 (한양대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 박주양 (한양대학교 건설환경공학과)
  • Published : 2011.12.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) is the mixed organic wastewater generated from palm oil industry. In this study, kinetic analysis with treating POME in an anaerobic hybrid reactor (AHR) was performed. Therefore, the AHR was monitored for its performances with respect to the changes of COD concentrations and hydraulic retention time (HRT). Batch tests were performed to find out the substrate removal kinetics by granular sludge from POME. Modified Stover Kincannon, First-order, Monod, Grau second-order kinetic models were used to analyze the performance of reactor. The results from the batch test indicate that the substrate removal kinetics of granular sludge is corresponds to follow Monod's theory. However, Grau second-order model were the most appropriate models for the continuous test in the AHR. The second order kinetic constant, saturation value constant, maximum substrate removal rate, and first-order kinetic constant were 2.60/day, 41.905 g/L-day, 39.683 g/L-day, and 1.25/day respectively. And the most appropriate model was Grau second-order kinetic model comparing the model prediction values and measured COD concentrations of effluent, whereas modified Stover-Kincannon model showed the lowest correlation.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmad, A.L., Ismail, S., Bhatia, S. (2003) Water recycling from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using membrane technology, Desalination 157 pp.87?95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00387-4
  2. Bhatia, S., Othman, Z., Ahmad, A.L. (2007) Coagulationflocculation process for POME treatment using Moringa oleifera seeds extract: ptimization studies, Chemical Enginerring Journal. 133 pp.205?212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.01.034
  3. Bhunia, P. & Ghangrekar, M.M., (2008) Analysis, evaluation, and optimization of kinetic parameters for performance appraisal and design of UASB reactors. Bioresource Technology, 99(7), pp.2132-2140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.053
  4. Buyukkamaci, N., & Filibeli, A. (2002) Determination of kinetic constants of an anaerobic hybrid reactor. Process Biochemistry 38, pp.73-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00047-X
  5. Castillo, A., Llabres, P., Mata-Alvarez, J. (1999) Kinetic study of a combined anaerobic-aerobic system for treatment of domestic sewage. Water Research 33(7) pp. 1742-1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00405-9
  6. Choorit, W. & Wisarnwan, P. (2007) Effect of temperature on the anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 10(3), pp.376-385.
  7. Debik, E. & Coskun, T. (2009) Use of the static granular bed reactor (SGBR) with anaerobic sludge to treat poultry slaughterhouse wastewater and kinetic modeling. Bioresource Technology, 100, pp.2777-2782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.058
  8. Del Nery, V., Pozzi, E., Damianovic, M.H.R.Z., Domingues, M.R., Zaiat, M. (2008) Granulation characteristics in the vertical profile of a full-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 99(6), pp.2018-2024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.019
  9. Donoso-Bravo, A., Mailier, J., Martin, C., Rodriguez, J., Aceves- Lara, C.A., Wouwer, A.V. (2011) Model selection, identification and validation in anaerobic digestion: A review. Water Research, 45, pp.5347-5364 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.059
  10. Grau, P. Dohanyas, M. Chudoba, J. (1975) Kinetic of multicomponent substrate removal by activated sludge. Water Research, 9 pp.337-342.
  11. Gobi, K., Mashitah, M.D., Vadivelu, V.M. (2011) Development and utilization of aerobic granules for the palm oil mill (POM) wastewater treatment. Chemical Enginerring Journal. 174 pp.213-220 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.09.002
  12. Isik, M., & Sponza, D.T. (2005) Substrate removal kinetics in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor decolorising simulated textile wastewater. Process Biochemistry 40(3-4), pp. 1189-1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.04.014
  13. Kincannon, D.F. & Stover, E.L. (1982) Design methodology for fixed film reaction-RBCs and biological towers. Civil Engineering for Practicing and Design Engineers. 2, pp.107-124.
  14. Maxham, J.V., Wakamiya, W. (1981) Innovative biological wastewater treatment technologies applied to the treatment of biomass gasification wastewater. Proceedings of the 35th Ind. Waste Conference, Purdue University, pp.80-94.
  15. Metcalf & Eddy, (2002) Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, 4th Ed, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  16. Najafpour, G.D., Zinatizadeh, A.A.L., Mohamed, A.R., Hasnain Isa, M., Nasrollahzadeh, H. (2006) High-rate anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent in an upflow anaerobic sludge-fixed film bioreactor. Process Biochemistry, 41, pp.370-379 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.06.031
  17. Rajeshwari, K.V., Balakrishnan, M., Kansal, A., Lata, K., Kishore V.V.N. (2000) State-of-the-art of anaerobic digestion technology for industrial wastewater treatment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 4, pp.135-156 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(99)00014-3
  18. Sandhya, S., Sarayu, K., Swaminathan, K. (2008) Determination of kinetic constants of hybrid textile wastewater treatment system. Bioresource Technology, 99(13), pp.5793-5797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.10.011
  19. Turkdogan-Aydinol, F.I., Yetilmezsoy, K., Comez, S., Bayhan, H. (2011) Performance evaluation and kinetic modeling of the start-up of a UASB reactor treating municipal wastewater at low temperature. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng., 34, pp.15.-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-010-0456-0
  20. Wong, B.T., Show, K.Y., Lee, D.J., Lai, J.Y. (2009) Carbon balanc e of anaerobic granulation process: Carbon credit. Bioresource Technology, 100, pp.1734-1739 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.045
  21. Wu, W., Wilson, F., Tay, J.H. (2000) Influence of media-packing ratio on performance of anaerobic hybrid reactors. Bioresource Technology, 71, pp.151-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)90067-6
  22. Yacobl, S., Hassan, H.A., Shirai, Y., Wakisaka, M., Subash, S. (20 06) Start-up operation of semicommercial closed anaerobi c digester for palm oil mill effluent treatment. Process Biochemistry, 41, pp. 962-964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.10.021
  23. Yilmaz, T., Yuceer, A., Basibuyuk, M. (2008) A comparison of the performance of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic filters treating papermill wastewater. Bioresource Technology. 99(1), pp.156-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.038
  24. Yu, H., Wilson, F., Tay, J.H. (1998) Kinetic analysis of an anaerobic filter treating soybean wastewater. Water Research, 32(11) pp. 3341-3352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00102-X
  25. Zhang, Y., Yan, L., Chi, L., Long, X., Mei, Z., Zhang, Z. (2008) Startup and operation of anaerobic EGSB reactor treating palm oil mill effluent, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 20(6), pp.658-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62109-9