An evaluation of local waters productivity by operating types

운영형태별 수도사업 생산성 평가

  • 김상문 (한국수자원공사 K-water연구원) ;
  • 이익규 (충북지방중소기업청)
  • Published : 2011.06.15

Abstract

Market Environment around water work industry is rapidly changing. ISO, International Organization for Standardization, announced the international water work service standard for comparison and evaluation between nations and businesses. And developed countries in water work are introducing market principle for growth of nation's water industry and reinforcement of its competitiveness. Also, some local governments entrusted their water utilities for improvement of competitiveness of water work. However, as some failure cases from overseas came out with emphasis, there are many refuting perspective about entrusted operation achievements of domestic water market. Hence, this paper evaluated competitiveness of domestic local water utilities from the perspective of productivity. After evaluating productivity using Malmquist productivity index, the authors compared and analyzed whether there is a difference of productivity between two different operating types by using Mann-Whitney test. As a result of analysis, it has shown that local water utilities achieved higher productivity at entrusted operation type rather than direct operation type. The local water utilities which chose entrusted operation had increased the productivity 13.9% on total factor productivity(TFP) during experimenting period, while the local water utilities which chose direct operation had increased 0.2%. The background of achieving this high productivity in entrusted operation was analyzed as a result of the higher technological effectiveness of a special water company. The result of this study can be referred when local government needs to decide on what operating types they will use.

Keywords

References

  1. 원구환(1998), 확률변경생산함수를 이용한 공익사업의 비용효율성 측정: 지방상수도사업의 패널자료(panel data)를 중심으로, 한국정책학회보, 제7권 제3호, pp. 287-306.
  2. 유금록(2002), 외환위기 이후 지방상수도사업의 생산성 변화 분석, 한국행정학보, 제36권 제4호, pp. 281-301.
  3. 윤경준․원구환(1996), 지방정부 직영기업의 상대적 효율성 평가 - 도시 상수도사업에 대한 Data Envelopment Analysis, 한국행정연구, pp. 199-220.
  4. 행정안전부(2006-2010), 지방공기업결산.
  5. 환경부(2010), 상수도통계.
  6. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes(1978), Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, pp. 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  7. Emmanuel Thanassoulis(2000), The use of data envelopment analysis in the regulation of UK water utilities: Water distribution, European Journal of Operational Research 126, pp. 436-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00303-3
  8. Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, and C.A.K. Lovell(1994), Production Frontiers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  9. Kazuo Aida, William W. Cooper, Jesus T. Pastor, Toshiyuki Sueyoshi(1998), Evaluating Water Supply Services in Japan with RAM: a Range-adjusted Measure of Inefficiency, OMEGA - The International Journal of Management Science, vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 207-232.
  10. Mukul Kulshrestha(2009), Efficiency Evaluation of Urban Water Supply Utilities in India, www.infraday.tu-berlin.de
  11. Surender Kumar(2010), Unaccounted for water and the performance of water utilities: an empirical analysis from India, Water Policy Uncorrected Proof, pp. 1-15.
  12. Tim Coelli(1996), A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) program.