DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Antioxidant Effects of Different Korean Pear Species

종에 따른 배나무 열매의 항산화 활성 비교

  • Lee, Cheol-Hee (Department of Horticultural Science, Chungbuk Nat'l Univ.) ;
  • Shin, So-Lim (Department of Horticultural Science, Chungbuk Nat'l Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Na-Rae (Department of Horticultural Science, Chungbuk Nat'l Univ.) ;
  • Hwang, Ju-Kwang (Department of Horticultural Science, Chungbuk Nat'l Univ.)
  • Received : 2011.01.17
  • Accepted : 2011.04.21
  • Published : 2011.04.30

Abstract

In this studies, contents and activities of antioxidative substances in the fruits of a pear cultivar and five Korean wild pear lines were investigated. The content of total phenolic compounds was highest with Pyrus pyrifolia var. culta "Shingo" (7.68 $mg{\cdot}g^{-1}$, D.W.) while total flavonoids was highest with P. ussuriensis var. acidula (5.66 $mg{\cdot}g^{-1}$, D.W.). The contents of total polyphenols and flavonoids varied according to plant species, but in general pyrifolia lines had higher total polyphenols than total flavonoids whereas in ussuriensis lines total flavonoid contents were higher than total polyphenols. The scavenging effects of DDPH radicals was highest with highest with P. ussuriensis var. seoulensis ($RC_{50}$=1.45 $mg{\cdot}mL^{-1}$) and that of ABTS radicals was highest with P. ussuriensis var. acidula ($RC_{50}$=0.69 $mg{\cdot}mL^{-1}$). A pear cultivar "Shingo" showed highest total polyphenol content, but scavenging activity of DDPH and ABTS radicals was lowest. The fruits of P. ussuriensis var. seoulensis contained low level of phenolic compounds, but their scavenging effects on two radicals was superior. Ferrous ion chelating effect was high in P. pyrifolia var. culta (98.93%), and in P. ussuriensis var. sinensis (68.71%), but two species had low scavenging activity. The content of phenolic compounds in wild pears was not always directly proportional to the radical scavenging activity. Neither radical scavenging activity was to ferrous ion chelating activity. In conclusion the fruits of P. ussuriensis var. acidula, P. ussuriensis var. seoulensis, and P. ussuriensis var. sinensis had great potential for the development of new antioxidative functional food because their antioxidative activity is higher or at least similar to P. pyrifolia var. culta. However, due to their different levels of antioxidative effects, the development of methods of using them jointly, not singly, to obtain maximum level of antioxidants is recommended.

본 연구는 한국에서 많이 재배하는 배나무속(Pyrus)의 신고배(P. pyrifolia var. culta)와 한국산 야생배 5종의 항산화 물질의 함량 및 항산화 활성을 비교하기 위하여 수행하였다. 돌배나무(P. pyrifolia), 취앙네(P. ussuriensis var. acidula), 백운배나무(P. ussuriensis var. hakunensis), 문배나무(P. ussuriensis var. seoulensis), 무심이배(P. ussuriensis var. seoulensis) 등 5종류의 한국산 야생배와 신고배의 페놀성 물질의 함량을 분석한 결과, 총 폴리페놀의 함량은 신고배(76.8 $mg{\cdot}g^{-1}$, D.W.), 총 플라보노이드의 함량은 취앙네(1.12 $mg{\cdot}g^{-1}$, D.W.)에서 가장 많았다. 식물의 종류에 따라 총 폴리페놀과 플라보노이드의 함량은 각기 달랐으나, P. pyrifiolia 계통에서는 총 폴리페놀의 함량이 총 플라보노이드의 함량보다 많고, P. ussuriensis 계통에서는 총 플라보노이드의 함량이 총 폴리페놀의 함량 보다 많은 경향을 보였다. DPPH radical 소거활성은 문배나무($RC_{50}$=1.45 $mg{\cdot}mL^{-1}$), ABTS radical 소거활성은 취앙네($RC_{50}$=0.69 $mg{\cdot}mL^{-1}$)에서 가장 우수하였다. 신고배는 총 폴리페놀의 함량이 가장 높았으나 DPPH와 ABTS radical 소거활성은 가장 낮았으며, 문배나무의 과실은 페놀성 물질의 함량은 낮았으나 radical 소거능이 우수한 특징을 보였다. $Fe^{2+}$ chelating은 radical 소거능이 낮았던 신고배(95.93%)와 무심이배(68.71%)에서 우수하였다. 따라서 야생배의 페놀성 물질의 함량은 radical 소거활성과 반드시 비례하지 않으며, 추출물의 radical 소거활성 또한 $Fe^{2+}$ chelating 활성과 비례하지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 연구의 결과, 한국산 야생배 중 취앙네, 문배나무, 무심이 배의 과실은 신고배보다 항산화활성이 우수하거나 유사한 것으로 나타나 항산화 기능성 천연소재로 활용가치가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 이들은 각기 우수한 항산화 활성이 다르므로 단독으로 사용하기 보다는 함께 이용하여 항산화활성을 증가시킬 수 있는 방법을 개발할 필요가 있는 것으로 생각되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, B.J., J.T. Lee, J.H. Gwag, J.M. Park, J.Y. Lee, J.H. Shon, J.H. Bae, and C. Chung. 2004. Biological activity of polyphenol group fraction from Korean pear peel. J. Kor. Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 47:92-95 (in Korean).
  2. Blois, M.S. 1958. Antioxidant determination by the use of a stable free radical. Nature 26:1198-1204.
  3. Bors, W. and M. Saran. 1987. Radical scavenging by flavonoid antioxidants. Free Rad. Res. Comm. 2:289-294. https://doi.org/10.3109/10715768709065294
  4. Braca, A., M. Politi, R. Sanogo, H. Sanou, I. Morelli, C. Pizza, and N. D.T. 2003. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds from wild and cultivated Scerocarya birrea (Anacardiaceae) leaves. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51:6689-6695. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf030374m
  5. Choi, H.J., H.S. Han, J.H. Park, J.H. Bae, H.S. Woo, B.J. An, M.J. Bae, H.G. Kim, and C. Choi. 2003. Effect of polyphenol compounds from Korean pear on immuno-functional activity. Kor. J. Food Cult. 18:303-310 (in Korean).
  6. Choi, H.J., J.H. Park, H.S. Han, J.H. Son, and C. Choi. 2004. Effect of polyphenol compounds from Korean pear on lipid metabolism. J. Kor. Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 33:299-304 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2004.33.2.299
  7. Choi, J.H., E.Y. Lee, J.S. Kim, G.B. Choi, S.G. Jung, Y.S. Ham, D.C. Seo, and J.S. Hea. 2006. Physiological activities according to cultivars and parts of Ulsan pear. J. Kor. Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 49:43-48 (in Korean).
  8. Ji, L.L. 1996. Exercise, oxidative stress and antioxidants. Am. J. Sports Med. 24(6 Suppl.):S20-S24.
  9. Fitzpatrick, D.F., S.L. Hirschfield, and R.G. Coffey. 1993. Endothelium-dependent vasorelaxing activity of wine and other grape products. Amer. J. Physiol. 265:H774-H778.
  10. Fridovich, I. 1986. Biological effect of the superoxide radical. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 247:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(86)90526-6
  11. Halliwell, B. 1997. Antioxidants and human disease: A general introduction. Nut. Rev. 55:267-277.
  12. Hasimoto, F., G.I. Nonaka, and I. Nishioka. 1989. Tannins and related compound from Oolong tea. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 37:3255-3263. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.37.3255
  13. Heo, J.C., K.Y. Lee, B.G. Lee, S.Y. Choi, S.H. Lee, and S.H. Lee. 2010. Anti-allergic activities of ultra-fine powder from persimmon. Kor. J. Food Preserv. 17:145-150 (in Korean).
  14. Hong, S.S., Y.P. Hong, B.S. Im, D.S. Jeong, and I.S. Shin. 2004. Influence of picking stage storage type on the fruit respiration change and panel test in 'Wonwang', 'Hwasan', and 'Mansoo' pear. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 22:55-62 (in Korean).
  15. Jangaard, N.O. 1970. Thin-layer chromatography of some plant phenolics. J. Chromat. 50:146-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)97933-0
  16. Labuza, T.P. 1971. Kinetics of lipid oxidation in foods. CRC Crit. Rev. Food Technol. 2:335-405.
  17. Lee, C.B. 1999. Illustrated Flora of Korea. Hyangmoonsa. Seoul (in Korean).
  18. Lee, D.S., S.K. Woo, and C.B. Yang. 1975. Studies on the chemical composition of major fruits in Korea. Kor. J. Food Sci. Technol. 4:123-139 (in Korean).
  19. Park, H.M., K.S. Lee, J.S. Hong, and M.J. Oh. 2009. Changes of chemical components during fermentation of pear (Pyrus pryifolica Nakai) wine. J. Agri. Sci. Chungnam Natl. Univ. 36:199-209 (in Korean).
  20. Park, Y., S.H. Choi, S.H. Kim, Y.S. Jang, J. Han, and H.G. Chung. 2008. Functional composition and antioxidant activity from the fruits of Rubus coreanus according to cultivars. Mokchae Konghak 36:102-109 (in Korean).
  21. Kim, E.Y., I.H. Baik, J.H. Kim, S.R. Kim, and M.R. Rhyu. 2004. Screening of the antioxidant activity of some medicinal plants. Kor. J. Food Sci. Technol. 36:333-338 (in Korean).
  22. Kim, H.S., K.M. Ku, J.K. Suh, and Y.H. Kang. 2009. Quinone reductase inductive activity and growth inhibitory effect against hepatoma cell of oriental melon extract. J. Bio-Environm. Cont. 18:448-453 (in Korean).
  23. Kim, H.Y., K.S. Woo, I.G. Hwang, Y.R. Lee, and H.S. Jeong. 2008. Effects of heat treatments on the antioxidant activities of fruits and vegetables. Kor. J. Food Sci. Technol. 40:166-170 (in Korean).
  24. NFRI. 1990. Manuals of quality characteristic analysis for food quality evaluation (2). National Food Research Institute, Skuba (in Japanese).
  25. Okuda T., T. Yoshida, and M. Ashida. 1981. Tannins of medicinal plants and drugs. Heterocycles 16:1618-1622.
  26. Re, R., N. Pellegrini, A. Proteggente, A. Pannala, M. Yang, and C. Rice-Evans. 1999. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 26:1231-1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3
  27. Sato, M., N. Ramarathnam, Y. Suzuki, T. Ohkubo, M. Takeuchi, and H. Ochi. 1996. Varietal differences in the phenolic content and superoxide radical scavenging potential of wines from different sources. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44:37-41. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf950190a
  28. Stajner, D., N. Milic, N. Mimica-Dukic, B. Lazic, and R. Igic. 1998. Antioxidant abilities of cultivated and wild species of garlic. Phytoth. Res. 12:S13-S14. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1573(1998)12:1+<S13::AID-PTR235>3.0.CO;2-5
  29. Velioglu, Y.S., G. Mazza, L. Cao, and B.D. Oomah. 1998. Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected fruits, vegetables, and grain products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46:4113-4117. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9801973
  30. Verpoorte, R., A. Contin, and J. Memelink. 2002. Biotechnology for the production of plant secondary metabolites. Phytochem. Rev. 1:13-25. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015871916833
  31. Yen, G.C., P.D. Duhb, and H.L. Tsaia. 2002. Antioxidant and pro-oxidant properties of ascorbic acid and gallic acid. Food Chem. 79:307-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00145-0
  32. Yu, T.J. 1989. The food guide. Munundang. Seoul. p. 166.
  33. Zhang, Y.B., H.J. Choi, H.S. Han, J.H. Park, J.H. Son, J.H. Bae, T.S. Seung, B.J. An, H.G. Kim, and C. Choi. 2003. Chemical structure of polyphenol isolated from Korean pear. Kor. J. Food Sci. Technol. 35:959-967.

Cited by

  1. Antioxidative Effect of Extracts from Different Parts of Kohlrabi vol.57, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3839/jabc.2014.056
  2. Antioxidant Activity of Pyrus serotina Fruit in Different Cultivars and Parts vol.25, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2012.25.4.498
  3. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Xanthium sibiricum vol.25, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2012.25.4.372
  4. Antioxidant Activities of Cedrela sinensis Hydrolysates Prepared Using Various Enzymes vol.47, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2015.47.4.413
  5. Estimation of Daily per Capita Intake of Total Phenolics, Total Flavonoids, and Antioxidant Capacities from Commercial Products of Japanese Apricot (Prunus mume) in the Korean Diet, Based on the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2010 vol.46, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2014.46.2.237
  6. Effects of Complex Carbohydrase Treatment on Physiological Activities of Pear Peel and Core vol.43, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2014.43.3.404
  7. 잘피(Zostera marina) 에탄올 및 물 추출물의 항산화 효과 vol.27, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5352/jls.2017.27.3.346
  8. 효소 처리에 따른 야생복숭아(Prunus persica L.) 당절임액의 품질 특성 및 항산화 효과 vol.23, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2017.23.5.003
  9. Satisfaction and purchase intention of imported fresh fruits based on familiarity: a case of Korean pears in Taiwan vol.122, pp.9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-08-2019-0639