DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

치과 내원 환자의 치아 이상(dental anomaly)에 관한 연구

A study on the prevalence of dental anomalies in Korean dental-patients

  • 이주희 (한림대학교 성심병원 치과교정과) ;
  • 양병호 (한림대학교 성심병원 치과교정과) ;
  • 이상민 (단국대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 김영희 (한림대학교 성심병원 치과 구강악안면방사선과) ;
  • 심혜원 (한림대학교 성심병원 치과보철과) ;
  • 정현숙 (한림대학교 성심병원 치과보존과)
  • Lee, Ju-Hee (Department of Orthodontics, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Yang, Byung-Ho (Department of Orthodontics, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Min (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Hee (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Shim, Hye-Won (Department of Prothodontics, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Chung, Hyun-Sook (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2011.03.16
  • 심사 : 2011.06.16
  • 발행 : 2011.10.30

초록

본 연구는 본원에 내원한 환자에 있어서 결손치, 매복치, 과잉치의 빈도 및 형태적 이상 등을 관찰하고자 하였다. 연구대상으로는 2009년 1월부터 2010년 6월까지 한림대학교 성심병원 치과에 내원한 환자를 대상으로 조사하였으며 의무기록지, 파노라마 방사선사진을 토대로 치아 이상에 대하여 성별, 치아 이상의 종류와 발생위치별로 조사하였다. 본 연구에서는 치아의 선천적 결손, 과잉치, 왜소치, 매복치, 변위치에 대한 치아 이상을 연구하였다. 연구기간동안 전체 내원하여 파노라마 방사선사진을 찍은 환자 3,133명 중 치아 이상을 가진 환자의 비율은 11.55%였다. 그 중 선천적 결손치를 가진 환자의 내원율은 5.71%로 가장 높았고, 매복치를 가진 환자는 3.09%였다. 과잉치, 왜소치, 변위치를 가진 환자의 비율은 각각 1.79%, 1.66%, 0.45%를 차지하였다. 치아의 수나 형태의 변화는 환자의 치료시 고려해야 할 필수적인 요소이다. 그러므로 치료를 위해 치과에 내원한 환자뿐만 아니라 구강검진으로 내원한 환자에서도 파노라마 방사선사진을 채득한다면 국민 구강보건 향상에 큰 도움이 될 것으로 생각된다.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of dental anomalies in outpatient clinics. Methods: The subjects of this study were 3,133 patients who visited the clinic between January 2009 and June 2011. The dental records and panoramic films of the patients and detection of supernumerary, missing, and impacted teeth, transposition, and peg lateralis were reviewed. The results were analyzed according to gender and types and locations of dental anomalies. Results: Among the patients, 362 had dental anomalies, with a prevalence rate of 11.55%. Congenital missing teeth (5.71%) ranked first in the categories, and impacted teeth (3.09%) ranked second. The percentage of patients having supernumerary teeth, peg lateralis, and dislocated teeth were 1.79%, 1.66%, and 0.45%, respectively. Conclusions: Congenital missing teeth and impacted teeth are, respectively, the first and second most common dental anomalies in Korean dental patients.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Stafne EC, Gibilisco JA. Oral roentgenographic diagnosis. 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1985. p. 18-45.
  2. Bhaskar SN. Orban's oral histology and embryology. 8th ed. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1976. p. 23-205.
  3. Schulze C. Developmental abnormalities of the teeth and jaws. In: Gorlin RJ, Goldman HM editors. Thoma's oral pathology. 6th ed. Vol. I. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1970. p. 112-22.
  4. Grahnen H. Hypodontia in the permanent dentition. A clinical and genetical investigation. Odont Revy 1956;7(Suppl 3):1-100.
  5. Silverman NE, Ackerman JL. Oligodontia: a study of its prevalence and variation in 4032 children. ASDC J Dent Child 1979;46:470-7.
  6. Kotsomitis N, Dunne MP, Freer TJ. A genetic aetiology for some common dental anomalies: a pilot twin study. Aust Orthod J 1996;14:172-8.
  7. Clayton JM. Congenital dental anomalies occurring in 3557 children. J Dent Child 1956;23:206-8.
  8. Buenviaje TM, Rapp R. Dental anomalies in children: a clinical and radiographic survey. ASDC J Dent Child 1984;51:42-6.
  9. Cha MH, Kim JT, Woo WS. Study on incidence of supernumerary and congenital missing teeth by Orthopantomography. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 1975;2:53-6.
  10. Lee JM, Lee SR. A clinical and radiographic study of congenitally missing teeth. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 1991;21:275-85.
  11. Lee MS, Lee JG. The statistical study of prevalence of dental anomalies. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 1985;12:175-90.
  12. Goaz PW, White SC. Oral radiology. 2nd ed. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1987. p. 421-7.
  13. Craig CE. Abnormalities in number and in the eruption path of teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1968;435-47.
  14. Muller TP, Hill IN, Peterson AC, Blayney JR. A survey of congenitally missing permanent teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1970;81:101-7. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1970.0151
  15. Rosenzweig KA, Garbarski D. Numerical aberrations in the permanent teeth of grade school children in Jerusalem. Am J Phys Anthropol 1965;12:277-83.
  16. Hunstadbraten K. Hypodontia in the permanent dentition. ASDC J Dent Child 1973;40:115-7.
  17. Endo T, Ozoe R, Kubota M, Akiyama M, Shimooka S. A survey of hypodontia in Japanese orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.024
  18. Niswander JD, Sujaku C. Congenital anomalies of teeth in Japanese children. Am J Phys Anthropol 1963;21:569-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330210413
  19. Lee JH, Shon HK, Jeon SJ, Choi HJ. A study on prevalence and pattern of dental anomalies. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 1996;23:429-49.
  20. Ranta R, Tulensalo T. Symmetry and combination of hypodontia in non-cleft and cleft palate children. Scand J Dent Res 1988;96:1-8.
  21. Glenn FB. A consecutive six-year study of the prevalence of congenitally missing teeth in private pedodontic practice of two geographically separated areas. J Dent Child 1964;31:264-70.
  22. Primosch RE. Anterior supernumerary teeth--assessment and surgical intervention in children. Pediatr Dent 1981;3:204-15.
  23. Ruhlman DC, Neely AR. Multiple impacted and erupted supernumerary teeth. Report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1964;17:199-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(64)90141-0
  24. Stafne EC. Supernumerary teeth. Dental Cosmos 1932;74:653-9.
  25. Kim YL, Hwang EH, Lee SR. A radiographic study of mesiodenses occurred in the maxillary central incisor region. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 1991;21:367-75.
  26. Jang YD, Hwang EH, Lee SR. A Roentgenocephalometric study of supernumerary teeth. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 1991;21:393-403.
  27. Rubenstein LK, Lindauer SJ, Isaacson RJ, Germane N. Development of supernumerary premolars in an orthodontic population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;71:392-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(91)90324-6
  28. Yang S, Kim JD. A study of dental anomalies. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 1993;23:303-14.
  29. Bolk L. Supernumerary teeth in the molar region in mandible. Dent Cosmos 1914;56:154-67.
  30. Thilander B, Myrberg N. The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish school children. Scand J Dent Res 1973;81:12-21.
  31. Turner C, Hill CJ. Supernumerary mandibular premolar: the importance of radiographic interpretation. ASDC J Dent Child 1986;53:375-7.
  32. Proffit WR. The development of orthodontic problems. In: Proffit WR, editor. Contemporary orthodontics. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1997. p. 110.
  33. Langland OE, Langlais RP, Morris CR. Principles and practice of panoramic radiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.; 1982. p. 157-204.
  34. Altug-Atac AT, Erdem D. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:510-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.027
  35. Kwon TH, Lee JG, Sohn HK, Kim HT. The surgical exposure and application of direct traction of impacted maxillary canine: a case report. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 1993;20:407-14.
  36. Uslu O, Akcam MO, Evirgen S, Cebeci I. Prevalence of dental anomalies in various malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:328-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.030
  37. Grover PS, Lorton L. The incidence of unerupted permanent teeth and related clinical cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;59:420-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(85)90070-2
  38. Peck L, Peck S, Attia Y. Maxillary canine-first premolar transposition, associated dental anomalies and genetic basis. Angle Orthod 1993;63:99-109.
  39. Mader C, Konzelman JL. Transposition of teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;98:412-3. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1979.0046
  40. Shapira Y, Kuftinec MM. Maxillary tooth transpositions: Characteristic features and accompanying dental anomalies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:127-34. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.111223
  41. Sandham A, Harvie H. Ectopic eruption of the maxillary canine resulting in transposition with adjacent teeth. Tandlaegebladet 1985;89:9-11.

피인용 문헌

  1. A Retrospective Longitudinal Study Regarding The Dental Anomalies Of Position With Eruptive Etiology vol.59, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2478/amma-2013-0034
  2. 상악 왜소측절치와 치아발육장애에 관한 연관성 조사 : 방사선학적 연구 vol.41, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5933/jkapd.2014.41.3.241
  3. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the number of non-syndromic congenitally missing permanent teeth per affected individual and its influencing factors vol.38, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv008
  4. Clinical Features and Correlation With Congenital Missing Teeth of Delayed First Permanent Molar vol.44, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5933/jkapd.2017.44.1.56
  5. 하악 제2소구치 결손과 연관된 치아 결손 및 발육지연 vol.45, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5933/jkapd.2018.45.4.484
  6. The global distribution of permanent canine hypodontia: A systematic review vol.51, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2021.51.1.55