한국통신학회논문지 (The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences)

  • 제36권3B호
  • /
  • Pages.231-239
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1226-4717(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3880(eISSN)
한국통신학회 (The Korean Institute of Commucations and Information Sciences)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

이동통신시장의 상호접속정산제도 개선 방안: Bill & Keep과 CPNP의 비교

An Alternative to Improve the Interconnection Arrangement of Mobile Communications Market: A Comparison between Bill & Keep vs. Calling Party's Network Pay Method

  • 김문수 (한국외국어대학교, 산업경영공학과)
  • 투고 : 2010.08.30
  • 심사 : 2011.02.21
  • 발행 : 2011.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

유럽의 이동통신선진국들을 중심으로 Bill & Keep이 CPNP방식에 비해서 사회후생 차원에서 그리고 공정경쟁의 활성화 차원에서 보다 우월하다는 최근의 연구들을 이론적인 측면과 실증적인 측면에서 고찰하고, 국내 이동통신시장에서의 서비스 및 수요 변화 등을 고려하여 현행 상호접속정산제도가 향후 Bill & Keep으로의 변화 필요성을 분석하여 정책적 시사점을 논의한다.

This paper reviews the recent theoretical and empirical studies on the European countries that the bill and keep settlement between mobile operators is superior to the financial settlement like CPNP from the perspectives of social welfare and fare competition in market. Besides these the recent studies, considering the change of mobile wholesale market in Korea, the necessity to introduce the bill and keep settlement as an alternative for the current CPNP as well as policy implication is examined.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. M. Armstrong, J. Wright, Mobile call termination in the UK, UCL, Sep. 2007.
  2. U. Berger, "Access charges in the presence of call externalities," Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(1), Article 21, 2004.
  3. U. Berger, "Bill-and-keep vs. cost-based access pricing revisited," Economics Letters, 86(1), pp.107-112, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2004.07.003
  4. D. Birke, G. Swann, "Network effects and the choice of mobile phone operator," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16(1-2), pp. 65-84, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-005-0001-5
  5. P. DeGraba, Efficient inter-carrier compensation for competing networks when customers share the value of a call, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12, pp.207-230, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1162/105864003766754206
  6. R. Dewenter, J. Kruse, "Calling party pays or receiving party pays?" Working Paper Series, University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Germany, 2005.
  7. EU, Progress report on the single European electronic communications market 2008 (14th report), 2009.
  8. D. Harbord, M. Pagnozzi, "Network-based price discrimination and 'bill-and-keep' vs. 'cost-based' regulation of mobile termination Rates," Review of Network Economics, 9(1), pp. 1-44, 2010.
  9. ITU, Interconnection on an IP-based NGN environment, 2007.
  10. J.-J. Laffont, P. Rey, J. Tirole, "Network competition II: price discrimination," RAND Journal of Economics, 29(1), pp. 38-56, 1998. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555815
  11. J. Lee, D. Lee, "Bill and keep as a solution for mobile-to-mobile interconnection of Korea," Third 2008 International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology, 2008.
  12. S.C. Littlechild, "Mobile termination charges: calling party pays versus receiving party pays," Telecommunications Policy, 30, pp. 242-277, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2006.01.002
  13. J.S. Marcus, Interconnection on an IP-based NGN environment, ITU, 2007.
  14. Merrill Lynch, Global wireless matrix 1Q07, 2007.
  15. NERA, MTAS - applicability of bill and keep, 2009.
  16. OECD, Cellular mobile pricing structures and trends, DSTI/ICCP/TISP(99)11/Final, 2000.
  17. Ofcom, Mobile call termination: market review, 2006.
  18. OVUM, Review of the regulatory framework for fixed-mobile convergence in Hong Kong, 2006.
  19. N. Quigley, W. Vogelsang, Interconnection pricing: bill and keep compared to TSLRIC, Charles River Associates (Asia Pacific) Ltd., 2003.
  20. 한국전자통신연구원, 융합환경에 적합한 접속료 산정 방안 연구, 2009.
  21. http://www.kcc.go.kr (2009. 8.13 검색)
  22. http://www.sktelecom.co.kr/(2009. 8.14 검색)
  23. http://www.sktelecom.co.kr/(2009. 8.14 검색)
  24. http://www.lgtelecom.co.kr/(2009. 8.14 검색)