한국안광학회지 (Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society)

한국안광학회 (The Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society)
권호 표지

Eye Dominance and Reading Speed

  • Chen, Ai-Hong (Department of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA) ;
  • Mustapha, Nurfazliha (Department of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA) ;
  • Rahman, Muhamad Irwan (Department of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA)
  • 투고 : 2011.07.30
  • 심사 : 2011.09.17
  • 발행 : 2011.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate eye dominance and reading performance based on eye movements and reading speed. Methods: The eye dominance of 30 subjects was determined using the sighting test (hole formed by hands). The subjects were asked to read the numerical reading material aloud in English from left to right and from right to left at random. The number of saccades, regressions, and inter-fixations per minute was calculated using Visual-Oculography (VOG) and the reading speed was recorded as number of characters per minute using stopwatch. Results: No significant differences in reading speed among right and left eye dominant subjects as they read from left to right and right to left directions (p>0.05). However, left eye dominant subjects were found to read significantly faster compared to right eye dominant subjects in both directions of reading (p<0.05). In term of eye movement patterns, no significant differences in saccades, regressions, and inter-fixations per minute were found between subjects with right eye dominance and left eye dominance for both reading directions (p>0.05). Conclusions: Reading performance in term of eye movement and speed was not affected by eye dominance, but subjects with left eye dominance read faster than subjects with right eye dominance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Millodot M., "Dictionary of Optometry and Visual Science", Butterworth-Heinemann, London, UK, pp. 103(2006).
  2. Banks M. S., Ghose T., and Hillis J. M., "Relative image size, not eye position, determines eye dominance switches", Vision Research, 44(3):229-234(2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.029
  3. Brackenridge C. J., "The contribution of genetic factors to ocular dominance", Behavioral Genetics, 12(3):319-325(1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067851
  4. Bchert M., Greenlee M. W., Rutschmann R. M., Kraemer F. M., Luo F., and Hennig J., "Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for binocular interactions in human visual cortex", Experimental Brain Research, 145(3):334-339(2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1121-x
  5. Terburg D., Hooiveld N., Aarts H., Kenemans J. L., and van Honk J., "Eye tracking unconscious face-to-face confrontations: dominance motives prolong gaze to masked angry faces", Psychol. Sci., 22(3):314-319(2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611398492
  6. Carey D. P., "Vision research: Losing sight of eye dominance", Curr. Biol., 11(20):R828-R830(2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00496-1
  7. Bartels A. and Logothetis N. K., "Binocular rivalry: a time dependence of eye and stimulus contributions", J. Vis., 10(12):3(2010). https://doi.org/10.1167/10.12.3
  8. Coren S. and Kaplan C. P., "Patterns of ocular dominance", Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom., 50(4):283-292(1973). https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-197304000-00002
  9. Bourassa D. C., McManus I. C., and Bryden M. P., "Handedness and eye-dominance: a meta-analysis of their relationship", Laterality, 1(1):5-34(1996).
  10. Chaurasia B. D. and Mathur B. B. L., "Eyedness", Karger, 96:301-305(1976).
  11. Legge G. S., Pelli D. G., Rubin G. S., and Schleske M. M., "Psychophysics of reading: I Normal Vision", Vis. Res., 25(2):239-252(1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(85)90117-8
  12. Rayner K., "Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research", Psychological Bulletin, 124(3):372-422(1998).
  13. Legge G. E., Cheung S. H., Yu D., Chung S. T., Lee H. W., and Owens D. P., "The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading", Journal of Vision, 7(2):9.1-15(2007).
  14. Bouma H., "Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition", Nature, 226(5241):177-178(1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/226177a0
  15. Yu D., Sing-Hang C., Legge G. E., and Susana T. L. C., "Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed", Journal of Vision, 7(2):2.1-10(2007). https://doi.org/10.1167/7.2.21
  16. Mansfield J. S., Legge G. E., and Bane M. C., "Psychophysics of Reading. XV: Font Effects in Normal and Low Vision", Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 37(8):1492-1501 (1996).
  17. Tinker M. A. and Peterson D. G., "Studies of Typographical Factors Influencing Speed of Reading. VII: Variation in Color of Print and Background", Journal of Applied Psychology, 15(5):471-479(1931).
  18. Oishi A., Tobimatsu S., Arakawa K., Taniwaki T., and Kira J., "Ocular dominancy in conjugate eye movements at reading distance", Neurosci. Res., 52(3):263-268(2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2005.03.013
  19. Mapp A. P., Ono H., and Barbeito R., "What does the dominant eye dominate? A brief and somewhat contentious review", Percept. Psychophys., 65(2):310-317(2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194802
  20. Gates A. I. and Bond G. L., "Relation of handedness, eyesighting and acuity dominance to reading", Journal of Educational Psychology, 27(6):450-456(1936).
  21. Maples W. C., "Handedness, Eyedness, Hand-Eye Dominance & Academic Performance", Journal Behavioral of Optometry, 13(4):87-90(2002).