대한물리의학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine)

  • 제6권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-8
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1975-311X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7215(eISSN)
대한물리의학회 (The Korean Society of Physical Medicine)
권호 표지

닫힌 사슬운동과 병행된 중간볼기근의 기능적 전기자극이 편마비환자의 보행에 미치는 효과

The Effect of Closed Kinetic Chain Exercise with FES of the Gluteus Medius on Gait in Stroke

  • 이수경 (대구대학교 대학원) ;
  • 박민철 (부산대학교병원 물리치료실) ;
  • 심제명 (김해대학 물리치료과) ;
  • 김경 (대구대학교 물리치료학과)
  • Lee, Su-Kyoung (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation, Daegu University) ;
  • Park, Min-Chull (Department of Physical Therapy, Pusan Nationnal University Hospital) ;
  • Shim, Je-Myung (Department of Physical Therapy, Gimhae College University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung (Department of Occupational therapy, College of Rehabilitation, Daegu University)
  • 투고 : 2010.09.28
  • 심사 : 2010.11.10
  • 발행 : 2011.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to find out the effect of closed kinetic chain exercise with functional electrical stimulation(FES) of the gluteus medius on gait in stroke. Methods : 30 hemiplegic patients voluntarily participated in this study. Subjects were divided into experimental group(n=15) and control group(n=15). Experimental group was given closed kinetic chain exercise with FES of the gluteus medius and control group was given only closed kinetic chain exercise for 4 weeks. All subjects were measured 10m-walking speed, cadence, functional walking category(FAC) and modified motor assessment scale(MMAS) before and after intervention. Results : In experimental group, gait velocity, cadence, FAC and MMAS showed significant difference between pre and post test(p<.05). In control group, gait velocity, cadence and FAC showed significant difference between pre and post test(p<.05). Before intervention, gait velocity, cadence, FAC and MMAS were not significant difference between experimental group and control group(p>.05), but after intervention, gait velocity, FAC and MMAS were significant difference(p<.05). Conclusion : This study show that closed kinetic chain exercise with functional electrical stimulation(FES) of the gluteus medius is beneficial intervention for increase the wlking ability in stroke.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김동욱. 성인 편마비환자의 중둔근 강화에 따른 균형과 보행속도 변화. 부산가톨릭대학교 대학원. 석사학위논문. 2008.
  2. 김수민. PNF와 순환운동이 집단훈련이 재가 뇌졸중 장애인의 운동기능 향상에 미치는 효과. 대구대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문. 2004.
  3. 김용철, 이석민, 송창호. 기능적 전기자극 치료가 편마비 환자의 균형에 미치는 영향. 대한물리치료학회지. 2004;16(3):539-48.
  4. 김의룡. 닫힌 사슬 운동과 열린 사슬 운동이 고관절 외전근의 활성도에 미치는 영향. 인제대학교 보건대학원 보건석사학위논문. 2006.
  5. 김좌준, 노민희, 구봉오 등. 속도-의존적 체중지지 트레드밀 보행이 뇌졸중 환자의 보행에 미치는 영향. 대한물리치료학회지. 2005;17(3):339-50.
  6. 문상은. 전신조정술. 서울. 정담미디어. 2004.
  7. 송선홍, 송우현, 유종윤 등. 초기 뇌졸중 환자에서 부분 체중 부하 Harness 착용 하 보행 훈련 효과 비교. 대한재활의학회지. 2003;27(5):653-60.
  8. 안창식, 정석. 정상인과 편마비환자의 보행분석 연구. 대한물리치료학회지. 2002;14(3):143-8.
  9. 양회송, 김광수, 이해덕. FES를 이용한 편마비 환자의 보행증진에 대한 연구. 대한물리치료사학회지. 1997;4(4):539-48.
  10. 임종수, 김순희, 송영화. 기능적 전기 자극에 대한 고찰. 대한물리치료사학회지. 1999;6(4):187-99.
  11. 정호중, 권도철, 박인선. Functional Electrical Stimulation(FES)시 자극 주파수 차이에 따른 근육의 반응 효과에 대한 연구. 대한재활의학회지. 1993;17(1):95-9.
  12. Adler S, Beckers D, Buck M. PNF in Practice. 3rd ed. Germany. Springer - Verlag. 2008.
  13. Aniansson A, Rundgren A, Sperling L. Evaluation of functional capacity in activities of daily living in 70-year-old men and women. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 1980;12(4): 145-54.
  14. Barbara J, Susan L. Physical Agents : Theory and Practice. 2rd ed. Philadelphia. F.A. Davis Co. 1996.
  15. Bogataj U, Gros N, Kliajic M et al. The rehabilitation of gait in patients with hemi-plegia: a comparison between conventional therapy and multichannel functional electical stimulation therapy. Phys Ther. 1995;75(6):490-502. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/75.6.490
  16. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;76(2):206-7.
  17. Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patient. Phys Ther. 1985;65(2):175-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/65.2.175
  18. Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Studies. 1990;12(1):6-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799009166594
  19. Davies PM. Steps to follow: a guide to the treatment of adult hemiplegia. 2rd ed. New York Springer-Verlag. 1985.
  20. Smith LK, Weiss EL, Don Lehmkuhl L. Brunnstrom's 임상운동학. 5th ed. 서울. 영문출판사. 1999.
  21. Lindquist AR, Parado CL, Barros RM et al. Gait training combining partial body-weight support, a treadmill, and functional electrical stimulation: effects in poststroke gait. phys Ther. 2007;87(9):1144-54. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20050384
  22. Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Reliability of the Modified Motor Assessment Scale and the Barthel Index. Phys Ther. 1988;68(7):1077-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/68.7.1077
  23. Schauer M, Mauritz Karl-Heinz. Musical motor feedback(MMF) in walking hemiparetic stroke patients: randomized trials of gait improvement. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(7):713-22. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215503cr668oa
  24. Palmitier RA, An KN, Scott SG et al. Kinetic chain exercise in knee rehabilitation. Sports Medicine. 1991;11(6):402-13. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199111060-00005
  25. Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK et al. Classification of walking handicap in the Stroke population. Stroke. 1995;26(6):982-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.26.6.982
  26. Perry J. Gait analysis : Normal and pathological function. 2rd ed. USA. Slack Inc. 2010.
  27. Hesse S, Bertelt C, Schaffrin A et al. Restoration in gait in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients by treadmill training with partial body weight support. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(10):1987-93.
  28. Hesse S, Werner C, Matthias K et al. Non-velocity related effects of a rigid double-stopped ankle-foot orthosis on gait and lower limb muscle activity of hemiparetic patients with an equinovarus deformity. Stroke. 1999;30(9):1855-61. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.9.1855
  29. Hesse S, Uhlenbrock D, Werner C et al. A mechanized gait trainer for restoring gait in non-ambulatory subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(9): 1158-61. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.6280
  30. Hesse S, Werner C, Paul T et al. Influence of walking speed on lower limb muscle activity and energy consumption during treadmill walking of hemiparetic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82 (11):1547-50. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.26607
  31. Kosak M, Smith T. Comparison of the 2-, 6-, and 12-minute walk tests in patients with stroke. Journal Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(1):103-7.
  32. Kralj A, Bajd T, Turk R. Enhancement of gait restoration in spinal injuryed patients by functional electrical stimulation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(233):34-43.
  33. Pohl M, Mehrholz j, Ritschel C et al. Speed-dependent treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients. Stroke. 2002;33(2): 553-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/hs0202.102365
  34. Robinett CS, Vondran MA. Functional ambulation velocity and distance requirements in rural and communities. Phys Ther. 1988;68(9):1371-3. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/68.9.1371
  35. Tyson SF. The support taken through walking aids during hemiplegic gait. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12(5): 395-401. https://doi.org/10.1191/026921598669871795