Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Case series of maxillary sinus augmentation with biphasic calcium phosphate: a clinical and radiographic study

  • Cha, Jae-Kook (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Park, Jung-Chul (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2010.12.30
  • Accepted : 2011.02.25
  • Published : 2011.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate 3.5 years-cumulative survival rate of implants placed on augmentedsinus using Osteon, a bone graft material, and to assess the height of the grafted material through radiographic evaluation. Methods: Twenty patients were treated with maxillary sinus augmentation and 45 implant fixtures were installed simultaneously or after 6 months healing period. The height of the augmented sinus and the loss of marginal bone were measured by panoramic and intraoral radiographs immediately after augmentation and up to 42 months (mean, 19.4 months) subsequently. Changes in the height of the sinus graft material were calculated radiographically. Results: The cumulative survival rate was 95.56% in all 45 implants. Additionall, normal healing process without any complication was observed in all patients. The original sinus height was mean 4.3 mm and the augmented sinus height was mean 13.4 mm after the surgery. The mean marginal bone loss till 42 months was $0.52{\pm}0.56\;mm$. The reduced height of Osteon was $0.83{\pm}0.38\;mm$ and it did not show significant correlation with the follow up periods (P=0.102). There were no statistically significant differences in reduced height of Osteon according to the simultaneous/delayed implantation (P=0.299) and particle size of Osteon (P=0.644). Conclusions: It can be suggested that Osteon may have predictable result when it was used as a grafting material for sinus floor augmentation.

Keywords

References

  1. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Rimondini L. Dental implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses: a retrospective analysis of clinical outcome according to the initial clinical situation and a proposal of defect classification. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:416-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01489.x
  2. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13 Suppl:11-45.
  3. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35(8 Suppl):216-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x
  4. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:328-43. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328
  5. Hallman M, Hedin M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:277-84. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.30576
  6. Johansson B, Grepe A, Wannfors K, Hirsch JM. A clinical study of changes in the volume of bone grafts in the atrophic maxilla. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30:157-61. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600601
  7. Misch CE, Dietsh F. Bone-grafting materials in implant dentistry. Implant Dent 1993;2:158-67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199309000-00003
  8. Dalkyz M, Ozcan A, Yapar M, Gökay N, Yüncü M. Evaluation of the effects of different biomaterials on bone defects. Implant Dent 2000;9:226-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200009030-00008
  9. Kim YK, Yun PY, Kim SG, Lim SC. Analysis of the healing process in sinus bone grafting using various grafting materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:204-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.021
  10. Daculsi G, LeGeros RZ, Nery E, Lynch K, Kerebel B. Transformation of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics in vivo: ultrastructural and physicochemical characterization. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:883-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820230806
  11. Gauthier O, Bouler JM, Aguado E, Pilet P, Daculsi G. Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics: influence of macropore diameter and macroporosity percentage on bone ingrowth. Biomaterials 1998;19:133-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00180-4
  12. Karabuda C, Ozdemir O, Tosun T, Anil A, Olgaç V. Histological and clinical evaluation of 3 different grafting materials for sinus lifting procedure based on 8 cases. J Periodontol 2001;72:1436-42. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1436
  13. Nery EB, LeGeros RZ, Lynch KL, Lee K. Tissue response to biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic with different ratios of HA/beta TCP in periodontal osseous defects. J Periodontol 1992;63:729-35. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.9.729
  14. Yamada S, Heymann D, Bouler JM, Daculsi G. Osteoclastic resorption of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;37:346-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19971205)37:3<346::AID-JBM5>3.0.CO;2-L
  15. Yamada S, Heymann D, Bouler JM, Daculsi G. Osteoclastic resorption of calcium phosphate ceramics with different hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate ratios. Biomaterials 1997;18:1037-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00036-7
  16. Kim YK, Yun PY, Lim SC, Kim SG, Lee HJ, Ong JL. Clinical evaluations of OSTEON as a new alloplastic material in sinus bone grafting and its effect on bone healing. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;86:270-7.
  17. Lee JH, Jung UW, Kim CS, Choi SH, Cho KS. Maxillary sinus augmentation using macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate (MBCP(TM)): three case report with histologic evaluation. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2006;36:567-77. https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2006.36.2.567
  18. Zitzmann NU, Schärer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:8-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90391-2
  19. Zarb GA, Zarb FL. Tissue integrated dental prostheses. Quintessence Int 1985;16:39-42.
  20. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38:613-6.
  21. Kent JN, Block MS. Simultaneous maxillary sinus floor bone grafting and placement of hydroxylapatite-coated implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;47:238-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(89)90225-5
  22. Cutler SJ, Ederer F. Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis 1958;8:699-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7
  23. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:33-40. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010105.x
  24. Block MS, Kent JN, Kallukaran FU, Thunthy K, Weinberg R. Bone maintenance 5 to 10 years after sinus grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56:706-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90801-1
  25. Chanavaz M. Maxillary sinus: anatomy, physiology, surgery, and bone grafting related to implantology--eleven years of surgical experience (1979-1990). J Oral Implantol 1990;16:199-209.
  26. Chanavaz M, Francke JP, Donazzan M. The maxillary sinus and implantology. Chir Dent Fr 1990;60:45-54.
  27. Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:339-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00996.x
  28. Maiorana C, Sigurtà D, Mirandola A, Garlini G, Santoro F. Sinus elevation with alloplasts or xenogenic materials and implants: an up-to-4-year clinical and radiologic follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:426-32.
  29. Hieu PD, Chung JH, Yim SB, Hong KS. A radiographical study on the changes in height of grafting materials after sinus lift: a comparison between two types of xenogenic materials. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2010;40:25-32. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2010.40.1.25
  30. Kahnberg KE, Ekestubbe A, Gröndahl K, Nilsson P, Hirsch JM. Sinus lifting procedure. I. One-stage surgery with bone transplant and implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:479-87. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120508.x
  31. Keller EE, Eckert SE, Tolman DE. Maxillary antral and nasal one-stage inlay composite bone graft: preliminary report on 30 recipient sites. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52:438-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(94)90335-2
  32. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Bainton R, Smith FW. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of a sinus lift operation using reoxidised cellulose (Surgicel) as graft material. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:526-30. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120514.x

Cited by

  1. Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Stimulates the Osteogenic Potential of the Schneiderian Membrane: A Histometric Analysis in Rabbits vol.19, pp.17, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0724
  2. A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Preclinical Trial to Evaluate Different Formulations of Biphasic Calcium Phosphate in Combination With a Hydroxyapatite Collagen Membrane to Reconstruct Deficient vol.39, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-12-00185
  3. The Clinical and Histologic Outcome of Dental Implant in Large Ridge Defect Regenerated With Alloplast: A Randomized Controlled Preclinical Trial vol.39, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-12-00242
  4. Efficacy of multislice computed tomography in assessment of maxillary sinus volume before sinus lifting for implant : vol.4, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.omx.0000433265.46846.cf
  5. Evaluation of anatomical considerations in the posterior maxillae for sinus augmentation vol.2, pp.11, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v2.i11.683
  6. Osteoconductivity and biodegradation of synthetic bone substitutes with different tricalcium phosphate contents in rabbits vol.102, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32984
  7. Bone cement grafting increases implant primary stability in circumferential cortical bone defects vol.45, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2015.45.1.30
  8. Tenting effect of the elevated sinus membrane over an implant with adjunctive use of a hydroxyapatite‐powdered collagen membrane in rabbits vol.26, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12362
  9. Marginal Bone Loss in Implants Placed in the Maxillary Sinus Grafted With Anorganic Bovine Bone: A Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Study vol.87, pp.8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.150514
  10. Late-term healing in an augmented sinus with different ratios of biphasic calcium phosphate: a pilot study using a rabbit sinus model vol.46, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.1.57
  11. Analysis of Bone Height Changes after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Simultaneous and Delayed Placement of Dental Implants: A Clinical and Radiographic Study vol.25, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12317
  12. Sinus augmentation using a histone deacetylase inhibitor in a calcium sulfate carrier in rabbit: A pilot study vol.105, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33727
  13. Open sinus lift surgery and augmentation with (SCPC versus H.A): A systematic review vol.4, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fdj.2018.08.002
  14. Maxillary sinus augmentation using biphasic calcium phosphate: dimensional stability results after 3-6 years vol.49, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2019.49.1.47
  15. Biphasic hydroxyapatite and ß‐tricalcium phosphate biomaterial behavior in a case series of maxillary sinus augmentation in humans vol.30, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13419
  16. The clinical and radiographic outcomes of Schneiderian membrane perforation without repair in sinus elevation surgery vol.21, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12752
  17. Tissue Level Changes after Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation with Three Types of Calcium Phosphate Ceramics: A Radiological Study with a 5-Year Follow-Up vol.14, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14061471