Relationship Between Electromyographic Activity of the Abductor Hallucis and the Pressure of a Pinch Gauge During Short Foot Exercise

  • Park, Kyung-Mi (Dept. of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Cynn, Heon-Seock (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Yonsei University, Dept. of Ergonomic Therapy, The Graduate School of Health and Environment, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Houng-Sik (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Hanseo University)
  • Received : 2011.10.05
  • Accepted : 2011.11.02
  • Published : 2011.11.19

Abstract

The aims of this study were to investigate the correlation between the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the abductor hallucis (AbdH) and the amount of pressure measured by a pinch gauge (PG), and to compare the EMG activity of AbdH and the pressure measured by the PG during short foot (SF) exercise in subjects with pes planus and in subjects with a neutral foot alignment. Fourteen subjects were recruited for this study (pes planus group=7; neutral foot alignment group=7). A surface EMG was used to collect AbdH activity, and a PG was positioned under the first metatarsophalangeal joint to measure the pressure produced by the first metatarsal head during the SF exercise. The AbdH activity and the pressure measured by the PG showed a positive good correlation (r=.80, p<.05). The EMG activity of the AbdH and the pressure measured by the PG were significantly lower for subjects with pes planus than for subjects with a neutral foot alignment (p<.05). Based on these findings, the PG can be recommended as an effective instrument for evaluating the performance of the AbdH. It may also be beneficial for monitoring how well the SF exercise is performed, and for providing visual feedback to patients with pes planus during SF exercise in a clinical setting.

Keywords

References

  1. Arinci Incel N, Genc H, Erdem HR, et al. Muscle imbalance in halluxvalgus: An electromyographic study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(5):345-349.
  2. Banks AS, Downey MS, Martin DE, et al. McGlamry's Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 3rd ed. Philadelphia PA, Williams and Wilkins, 2001.
  3. Cole C, Seto C, Gazewood J. Plantar fasciitis: Evidence-based review of diagnosis and therapy. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72(11):2237-2242.
  4. Cote KP, Brunet ME, Gansneder BM, et al. Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability. J Athl Train. 2005;40(1):41-46.
  5. Fiolkowski P, Brunt D, Bishop M, et al. Intrinsic pedal musculature support of the medial longitudinal arch: An electromyography study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003;42(6):327-333. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2003.10.003
  6. Franco AH. Pes cavus and pes planus. Analyses and treatment. Phys Ther. 1987;67(5):688-694. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/67.5.688
  7. Greenman P. Principles of Manual Medicine. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkin, 2003.
  8. Headlee DL, Leonard JL, Hart JM, et al. Fatigue of the plantar intrinsic foot muscles increases navicular drop. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008;18(3):420-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.11.004
  9. Hintermann B, Nigg BM. Pronation in runners. Implications for injuries. Sports Med. 1998;26(3):169-176. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199826030-00003
  10. Jung DY, Kim MH, Koh EK, et al. A comparison in the muscle activity of the abductor hallucis and the medial longitudinal arch angle during toecurl and short foot exercises. Phys Ther Sport. 2011;12(1):30-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2010.08.001
  11. Kaufman KR, Brodine SK, Shaffer RA, et al. The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27(5):585-593.
  12. Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG, et al. Muscles: Testing and functions, with posture and pain. 5th ed. Baltimore, Lippincott Willams & Wilkins, 2005.
  13. Kura H, Luo ZP, Kitaoka HB, et al. Quantitative analysis of the intrinsic muscles of the foot. Anat Rec. 1997;249(1):143-151. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199709)249:1<143::AID-AR17>3.0.CO;2-P
  14. Mann R, Inman VT. Phasic activity of intrinsic muscles of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964;46:469-481. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-196446030-00001
  15. May TJ, Judy TA, Conti M, et al. Current treatment of plantar fasciitis. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2002;1(5):278-284. https://doi.org/10.1249/00149619-200210000-00005
  16. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research; Applications to Practice. 3rd ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 2009.
  17. Prentice WE. Rehabilitation Techniques in Sports Medicine. 4th ed. New York, McGraw Hill Higher Education, 2009.
  18. Razeghi M, Batt ME. Foot type classification: A critical review of current methods. Gait Posture. 2002;15(3):282-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00151-5
  19. Rothermel SA, Hale SA, Hertel J, et al. Effect of active foot positioning on the outcome of a balance training program. Phys Ther Sport 2004;5(2):98-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1466-853X(04)00027-6
  20. Sell KE, Verity TM, Worrell TW, et al. Two measurement techniques for assessing subtalar joint position: A reliability study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;19(3):162-7. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1994.19.3.162
  21. Van Boerum DH, Sangeorzan BJ. Biomechanics and pathophysiology of flat foot. Foot Ankle Clin. 2003;8(3):419-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1083-7515(03)00084-6
  22. Wearing SC, Smeathers JE, Yates B, et al. Sagittal movement of the medial longitudinal arch is unchanged in plantarfasciitis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(10):1761-1767. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000142297.10881.11
  23. Wong YS. Influence of the abductor hallucis muscle on the medial arch of the foot: A kinematic and anatomical cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(5):617-620. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0617