Physical Therapy Korea (한국전문물리치료학회지)

Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy (한국전문물리치료학회)
권호 표지

Correlations of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement, Berg Balance Scale, and Modified Barthel Index in Patients With Acute Stroke

급성기 뇌졸중 환자에서 Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement와 Berg Balance Scale, Modified Barthel Index와의 상관관계

  • Chung, Yu-Hoe (Team of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Song, Eun-Ji (Team of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Kang-Noh (Team of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Ahn, Jun-Su (Team of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Seong, Jun-Hyuk (Team of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Song, Mun-Seong (Team of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Asan Medical Center)
  • 정유회 (서울아산병원 재활의학팀) ;
  • 송은지 (서울아산병원 재활의학팀) ;
  • 이강노 (서울아산병원 재활의학팀) ;
  • 안준수 (서울아산병원 재활의학팀) ;
  • 성준혁 (서울아산병원 재활의학팀) ;
  • 송문성 (서울아산병원 재활의학팀)
  • Received : 2011.03.16
  • Accepted : 2011.04.14
  • Published : 2011.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) in the acute stroke care setting. Twenty patients with their first stroke were evaluated using STREAM, BBS, and MBI initially and at 4 weeks. The data was analyzed using the independent t-test, paired t-test, and the Pearson product moment correlation analysis. The scores on the STREAM were strongly associated with the scores on both the BBS and MBI (with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from .88 to .95), and there was significant improvement between the initial scores and those obtained four weeks later for STREAM, BBS, and MBI (p=.001, p=.001, p<.001). The results suggest that STREAM may be able to reflect functional recovery and to assess voluntary movement in patients who have suffered an acute stroke.

Keywords

References

  1. 강연욱, 나덕렬, 한승혜. 치매 환자들을 대상으로 한 K-MMSE의 타당도 연구. 대한신경과학회지. 1997;15(2):300-308.
  2. 윤성준, 원종혁, 이충휘. 뇌졸중 환자 평가를 위한 Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement의 측정자간 신뢰도. 한국전문물리치료학회지. 2010;17(3): 48-58.
  3. Ahmed S, Mayo NE, Higgins J, et al. The stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement(STREAM): A comparison with other measures used to evaluate effects of stroke and rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2003;83(7):617-630.
  4. Berg K, Maki BE, Williams JI, et al. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly peculation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(11):1073-1080.
  5. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. The Balance Scale: Reliability assessment for elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995;27(1):27-36.
  6. Bogle Thorbahn LD, Newton RA. Use of the Berg Balance Test to predict falls in elderly persons. Phys Ther. 1996;76(6):576-583.
  7. Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke. 1988;19:1497-1500. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.19.12.1497
  8. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, et al. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther. 1985;65(2):175-180.
  9. Daley K, Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S. Reliability of scores on the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement (STREAM) measure, Phys Ther 1999;79(1):8-19.
  10. Daley K, Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. Verification of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement (STREAM). Physiother Can. 1997;49:269-278.
  11. Donaldson SW, Wagner CC, Gresham GE. A Unified ADL evaluation form. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1973;54(4):175-179.
  12. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, et al. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke: Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke. 1992;23(8):1084-1089. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.23.8.1084
  13. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state" : A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):l89-198.
  14. Granger CV, Dewis LS, Peters NC, et al. Stroke rehabilitation: Analysis of repeated Barthel index measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979;60(1):14-17.
  15. Gresham GE, Duncan PW, Stason WB, et al. Post-stroke rehabilitation. In: National library of medicine national institutes of health. HSTAT Archive Collection. Betheda, MD, National library of medicine national institutes of health. 1995.
  16. Gresham GE, Phillips TF, Labi ML. ADL status in stroke: Relative merits of three standard indexes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980;61(8):355-358.
  17. Hsueh IP, Lee MM, Hsieh CL. Psychometric characteristics of the Barthel activities of daily living index in stroke patients. J Formos Med Assoc. 2001;100(8):526-532.
  18. Hsueh IP, Wang WC, Wang CH, et al. A simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement instrument. Phys Ther. 2006;86(7):936-943.
  19. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al, Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study, Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(5):406-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80568-0
  20. Kwok T, Lo RS, Wong E, et al. Quality of life of stroke survivors; A 1-year follow-up study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(9):1177-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.015
  21. Kwon S, Hartzema AG, Duncan PW, et al. Disability treasures in stroke: Relationship among the Barthel index, the functional independence measure. and the modified Rankin scale. Stroke. 2004;35:918-923. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000119385.56094.32
  22. Lennon S, Johnson L. The modified rivermead mobility index: Validity and reliability. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22(18):833-839. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280050207884
  23. Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Reliability of the modified motor assessment scale and the Barthel index. Phys Ther. 1988:68(7):1077-1081.
  24. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Md state Med J. 1965:14:61-65.
  25. Roy CW, Togneri J, Hay E, et al. An inter-rater reliability study of the Barthel index. Int J Rehabil Res. 1988;11(1):67-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-198803000-00010
  26. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(8):703-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6
  27. Shinar D, Gross CR, Mohr JP, et al. Interobserver variability in the assessment of neurologic history and examination in the Stroke Data Bank. Arch Neurol. 1985;42(6):557-565. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1985.04060060059010
  28. Sommerfeld DK, Eek EU, Svensson AK, et al. Spasticity after stroke: Its occurrence and association with motor impairments and activity limitations. Stroke. 2004;35(1):134-139.
  29. Wade DT, Hewer RL. Functional abilities after stroke: Measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neural Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987;50(2):177-182. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.50.2.177
  30. Wang CH, Hsieh, CL, Dai MH, et al. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement (STREAM) Instrument. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34(1);20-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/165019702317242668
  31. Wellwood I, Dennis MS, Warlow CP. A comparison of the Barthel index and the OPCS disability instrument used to measure outcome after acute stroke. Age Ageing. 1995;24(1):54-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/24.1.54
  32. Wood-Dauphinee S, Berg K, Bravo G, et al. The balance scale: Responsiveness to clinically meaningful changes. Can J Rehab. 1997;10:30-50.
  33. Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Shapiro SH. Examining outcome measures in a clinical study of stroke. Stroke. 1990;21(5):731-739. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.21.5.731