The Effect of Action Observational Training on Arm Function in People With Stroke

동작관찰훈련이 뇌졸중 환자의 상지 기능에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Moon-Kyu (Dept. of Rehabilitation Center, Gwangju City Rehabilitation Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Man (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Division of Health, Seonam University)
  • 이문규 (광주 씨티재활병원 재활센터) ;
  • 김종만 (서남대학교 보건학부 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2011.03.30
  • Accepted : 2011.05.02
  • Published : 2011.05.31

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of action-observation training on arm function in people with stroke. Fourteen chronic stroke patients participated in action-observation training. Initially, they were asked to watch video that illustrated arm actions used in daily activities; this was followed by repetitive practice of the observed actions for 3 times a week for 3 weeks. Each training session lasted 30 min. All subject participated 12 training session on 9 consecutive training days. For the evaluation of the clinical status of standard functional scales, Wolf motor function test was carried out at before and after the training and at 2 weeks after the training. Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze the results of the clinical test. There was a significant improvement in the upper arm functions after the 3-week action-observation training, as compared to that before training. The improvement was sustained even at two weeks after the training. This result suggest that action observation training has a positive additional impact on recovery of stroke-induced motor dysfunctions through the action observation-action execution matching system, which includes in the mirror neuron system.

Keywords

References

  1. 김종만, 양병일, 이문규. 동작관찰훈련이 뇌졸중 환자의 손 조작능력에 미치는 영향. 한국전문물리치료학회지. 2010;17(2):17-24.
  2. Bobath B. Adult Hemiplegia; Evaluation and treatment Oxford Butterworth-Heinemann, 1990.
  3. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci. 2001;13(2):400-404.
  4. Buccino G, Lui F, Canessa N, et al. Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by nonconspecifics: An fmri study. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004a;16(1):114-126.
  5. Buccino G, Riggio L. The role of the mirror neuron system in motor learning. Kinesiology. 2006:38(1):5-15.
  6. Buccino G, Solodkin A, Small SL. Functions of the mirror neuron system: Implications for neurorehabilitation. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006;19(1):55-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/00146965-200603000-00007
  7. Buccino G, Vogt S. Ritzl A, et al. Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron. 2004b;42(2):323-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00181-3
  8. Calvo-Merino B, Glaser D, Grezes J, et al. Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cereb Cortex. 2005;15(8):1243-1249.
  9. Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Neurological Rehabilitation: Optimizing motor performance, 2nd ed. Oxford Churchill Livingston, 2002.
  10. Cattaneo L, Rizzolatti G. The mirror neuron system. Arch Neurol. 2009;66(5):557-560. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2009.41
  11. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, San Diego. CA, Academe Press, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.
  12. de Vries S, Mulder T. Motor imagery and stroke rehabilitation: A critical discussion. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(1):5-13. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0020
  13. Dobkin BH. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(16):1677-1684. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp043511
  14. Dobkin BH. Training and exercise to drive poststroke recovery. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008;4(2):76-85.
  15. Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A, et al. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. NeuroImage. 2007;36:164-173.
  16. Ewan LM, Kinmond K, Holmes PS. An observation-based intervention for stroke rehabilitation; Experiences of eight individuals effected by stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(25):2097-2106. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.481345
  17. Fabbri-Destro M, Rizzolatti G. Mirror neurons and mirror systems in monkeys and humans. Physiology (Bethesda). 2008;23:171-179. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00004.2008
  18. Garrison KA, Winstein CJ, Aziz-Zadeh L. The minor neuron system: A neural substrate for methods in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(5):404-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968309354536
  19. Haslinger B, Erhard P, Altenmuller E, et al. Transmodal sensorimotor networks during action observation in professional pianists. J Cognitive Neurosci. 2005;17(2):282-293. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929053124893
  20. Iacoboni M, Dapretto M. The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7(12):942-951. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2024
  21. Iacoboni M, Woods RP, Brass M, et al. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science. 1999;286(5449):2526-2528. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5449.2526
  22. Jeannerod M, Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage. 2001;14(1 Pt 2):S103-109. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
  23. Johansson BB. Current trends in stroke rehabilitation: A review with focus on brain plasticity. Acta Neurol Scand. 2011;123(3):147-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01417.x
  24. Koch G, Versace V, Bonni S, et al. Resonance of cortico-cortical connections of the motor system with the observation of goal directed grasping movements. Neuropsychologia. 2010.
  25. Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF, et al. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2009;89(8):840-850. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080285
  26. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, et al. The reliability the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(6):750-755. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.23183
  27. Nudo RJ. Mechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damage. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006a;16(6):638-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2006.10.004
  28. Nudo RJ. Plasticity. NeuroRx. 2006b;3(4):420-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurx.2006.07.006
  29. Oujamaa L, Relave I, Froger J, et al. Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009;52(3):269-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2008.10.003
  30. Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, et al. A randomzed efficacy and feasibility study of imagery in acute stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15(3):233-240. https://doi.org/10.1191/026921501672063235
  31. Perrett DI, Harries MH, Bevan R, et al. Frameworks of analysis for the neural representation of animate objects and actions. J Exp Biol. 1989;146:87-113.
  32. Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. 3rd ed. New Jersey, Prentice Hall. 2008.
  33. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:169-192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
  34. Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L. Gallese V, et al. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996;3(2):131-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0
  35. Shepherd RB. Exercise and training to optimize functional performance in stroke: Driving neural reorganization? Neural Plast. 2001;8(1-2):121-129. https://doi.org/10.1155/NP.2001.121
  36. Small SL, Buccino G, Solodkin A. The mirror neuron system and treatment of stroke. Dev Psychobiol. 2010.
  37. Stefan K, Cohen LG, Duque J, et al. Formation of a motor memory by action observation. J Neurosci. 2005;25(41):9339-9346. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2282-05.2005
  38. Strafella AP, Paus T. Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuroreport, 2000;11(10):2289-2292. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200007140-00044
  39. Umilta MA, Kohler E, Gallese V, et al, I know what you are doing: A neurophysiological study. Neuron. 2001;31(1):155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00337-3
  40. Voss DE, Ionta MK, Myers BJ. Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation: Patterns and techniques, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Harper & Row, 1985.
  41. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, et al. Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for rsearch in patients after stroke, Stroke. 2001;32(7):1635-1639. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1635
  42. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, et al. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989;104(2):125-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-4886(89)80005-6
  43. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;296(17):2095-2104. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.17.2095