Cortical Activation by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation in Normal Subjects: 2 Case Studies

정상 성인에서 경두개 직류 전류자극과 기능적 전기자극에 의한 대뇌피질의 활성화: 사례연구

  • Kwon, Yong-Hyun (Department of Physical Therapy, Yeungnam College of Science & Technology) ;
  • Kwon, Jung-Won (Department of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Daegu University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Young (Department of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Daegu University) ;
  • Jang, Sung-Ho (Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Yeungnam University)
  • 권용현 (영남이공대학 물리치료학과) ;
  • 권중원 (대구대학교 대학원 재활과학과) ;
  • 박상영 (대구대학교 대학원 재활과학과) ;
  • 장성호 (영남대학교 의과대학 재활의학교실)
  • Received : 2011.11.12
  • Accepted : 2011.02.11
  • Published : 2011.02.25

Abstract

Purpose: Recently, many studies have demonstrated that application of external stimulation can modulate cortical excitability of the human brain. We attempted to observe cortical excitability using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during the application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or functional electrical stimulation (FES). Methods: We recruited two healthy subjects without a history of neurological or psychiatric problems. fMRI scanning was done during? each constant anodal tDCS and FES session, and each session was repeated three times. The tDCS session consisted of three successive phases (resting phase: 60sec dummy cycle: 10sec tDCS phase: 60sec). The FES session involved stimulation of wrist extensor muscles over two successive phase (resting phase: 15sec FES phase: 15sec). Results: The average map of the tDCS and FES analyses showed that the primary sensory-motor cortex area was activated in all subjects. Conclusion: Our findings show that cortical activation can be induced by constant anodal tDCS and FES. They suggest that the above stimuli have the potential for facilitating brain plasticity and modulating neural excitability if applied as specific therapeutic interventions for brain injured patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Boros K, Poreisz C, Munchau A et al. Premotor transcranial direct current stimulation (tdcs) affects primary motor excitability in humans. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;27(5):1292-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06090.x
  2. Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Non-invasive brain stimulation: A new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(8):708-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70525-7
  3. Kim YH, You SH, Ko MH et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke. 2006;37(6):1471-6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000221233.55497.51
  4. Kwon YH, Ko MH, Ahn SH et al. Primary motor cortex activation by transcranial direct current stimulation in the human brain. Neurosci Lett. 2008;435(1):56-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2008.02.012
  5. Jang SH, Ahn SH, Byun WM et al. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the cortical activation by motor task in the human brain: An fmri study. Neurosci Lett. 2009;460(2):117-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.05.037
  6. Kwon YH, Kim CS, Jang SH. Cortical activation in the human brain induced by transcranial direct current stimulation. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2009;21(4):73-9.
  7. Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N et al. Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tdcs) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114(11):2220-2; author reply 2-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00235-9
  8. Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tdcs). Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;56:249-54.
  9. Hesse S, Werner C, Schonhardt EM et al. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: A pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(1):9-15.
  10. Park RJ. Electrotherapy. Seoul, Hyunmoon, 2003.
  11. Kitchen S. Electrotherapy: Evidence-based practice. 11th ed. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 2002.
  12. Yan T, Hui-Chan CW, Li LS. Functional electrical stimulation improves motor recovery of the lower extremity and walking ability of subjects with first acute stroke: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Stroke. 2005;36(1): 80-5. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000149623.24906.63
  13. Barzel A, Liepert J, Haevernick K et al. Comparison of two types of constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients: A pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;27(6):673-80.
  14. Birbaumer N, Ramos Murguialday A, Weber C et al. Neurofeedback and brain-computer interface clinical applications. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2009;86:107-17.
  15. Cramer SC, Bastings EP. Mapping clinically relevant plasticity after stroke. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39(5): 842-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3908(99)00258-0
  16. Jang SH, Ahn YH, Kim SH et al. Corticospinal tract restoration: Combined study of diffusion tensor tractography, functional mri, and transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31(6):901-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0b013e31804089a6
  17. Kim CS, Kim JH, Park MK et al. Comparison of cortical activation between concentric and eccentric exercise: A pilot fmri study. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2010;22(2):25-30.
  18. Park RJ, Lee MY, Cho IS et al. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in motor performance of visuomotor task. J Rehabil Res. 2008;12(3):39-53.
  19. Furubayashi T, Terao Y, Arai N et al. Short and long duration transcranial direct current stimulation (tdcs) over the human hand motor area. Exp Brain Res. 2008;185(2):279-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1149-z
  20. Celnik P, Paik NJ, Vandermeeren Y et al. Effects of combined peripheral nerve stimulation and brain polarization on performance of a motor sequence task after chronic stroke. Stroke. 2009;40(5):1764-71. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.540500
  21. Han BS, Jang SH, Chang Y et al. Functional magnetic resonance image finding of cortical activation by neuromuscular electrical stimulation on wrist extensor muscles. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(1):17-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-200301000-00003
  22. Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, Auerbach EJ et al. Electrical stimulation driving functional improvements and cortical changes in subjects with stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2004;154(4): 450-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1695-y
  23. Kwon YH, Jang SH, Han BS et al. The cortical activation by functional electrical stimulation, active and passive movement. KAUTPT. 2005;12(2):73-80.
  24. Lim YE, Kim SH, Yang DJ et al. Change of cerebral motor area activity by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tdcs). 2009;21(4):65-71.
  25. Schlaug G, Renga V, Nair D. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(12): d1571-6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.65.12.1571