DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Changes in Labor Regulations During Economic Crises: Does Deregulation Favor Health and Safety?

  • Jhang, Won-Gi (Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University)
  • Received : 2010.07.05
  • Accepted : 2010.10.26
  • Published : 2011.01.31

Abstract

Objectives: The regulatory changes in Korea during the national economic crisis 10 years ago and in the current global recession were analyzed to understand the characteristics of deregulation in labor policies. Methods: Data for this study were derived from the Korean government's official database for administrative regulations and a government document reporting deregulation. Results: A great deal of business-friendly deregulation took place during both economic crises. Occupational health and safety were the main targets of deregulation in both periods, and the regulation of employment promotion and vocational training was preserved relatively intact. The sector having to do with working conditions and the on-site welfare of workers was also deregulated greatly during the former economic crisis, but not in the current global recession. Conclusions: Among the three main areas of labor policy, occupational health and safety was most vulnerable to the deregulation in economic crisis of Korea. A probable reason for this is that the impact of deregulation on the health and safety of workers would not be immediately disclosed after the policy change.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwon S. Economic crisis and social policy reform in Korea. Int J Soc Welfare 2001; 10: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2397.00069-i9
  2. Kim IJ, Lee Y. An evaluation of the external currency crisis and the economic policy of IMF. J Money Financ 1998; 3(2): 247-293. (Korean)
  3. Fallon PR, Lucas REB. The impact of financial crises on labor markets, household incomes, and poverty: a review of evidence. World Bank Res Obs 2002; 17(1): 21-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/17.1.21
  4. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD stat extracts. [cited 2010 Sep 10]. Available from: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx.
  5. Keum JH. A study on working poor in Korea after the financial crisis. Korean J Labour Econ 2006; 29(1): 41-73. (Korean)
  6. Kang S, Keum J, Kim D, Shin D. Korea: labor market outcomes and policy responses after the Crisis. In: Betcherman G, Islam R. East Asian labor markets and the economic crisis: impacts responses. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2001. p. 97-139.
  7. Larner WJ. Neo-liberaliam: policy, ideology, governmentality. Stud Polit Econ 2000; 63: 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.2000.11675231
  8. Jessop B. From thatcherism to new labour: neo-liberalism, workfarism, and labour market regulation. [cited 2010 Sep 10]. Available from: http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/sociology/papers/jessop-from-thatcherism-to-new-labour.pdf.
  9. Statistics Korea. Korean statistical information service. [cited 2010 Mar 10]. Available from: http://www.kosis.kr/index/index.jsp. (Korean)
  10. Yun K. A comparative study on the administrative reforms by Sarkozy and by Lee. Korean Public Admin Rev 2009; 43(2): 287-308. (Korean)
  11. Regulatory Reform Committee, Republic of Korea. Administrative regulation search. [cited 2003 Jan 1]. Available from: URL: http://www.rrc.go.kr/. (Korean)
  12. Ministry of Labor. A plan for regulatory reform in labor area 2009. Seoul: Ministry of Labor: 2009. (Korean)
  13. Taylor G, Easter K, Hegney R. Enhancing occupational safety and health. Oxford: Elsevier; 2004. p. 31.
  14. Regulatory Reform Committee. The criteria for the decision and classification of administrative regulations. Seoul: Regulatory Reform Committee; 2000. (Korean)
  15. Meier KJ. Regulation: politics, bureaucracy, and economics. New York: St. Martin's Press; 1985. p. 1.
  16. Boyer R. The regulation school: a critical introduction. New York: Columbia University Press; 1990. p. 20.
  17. Moran M. The social and economic contexts. In: Jones B, Kavanagh D, Moran M, Norton P, editors. Politics UK. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2001. p. 44-71.
  18. Francis JG. The politics of regulation: a comparative perspective(Comparative Politics). Oxford: Blackwell; 1993. p. 5.
  19. Mitnick BM. The political economy of regulation: creating, designing, and removing regulatory forms. New York: Columbia University Press; 1980. p. 2-7.
  20. Botero JL, Djankov S, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A. The regulation of labor. Soc Sci Res Netw Econ 2004; 119: 1339-1382.
  21. Moon JY. A study of the enactment of national basic livelihood security act in Korea: with special references to the role of NGOs. Health Soc Welf Rev 2008; 28(1): 87-103. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2008.28.1.87
  22. Kim MG. Change and outlook of the basic livelihood security system in 2010. Health Welf Policy Forum 2010; 159: 45-53. (Korean)
  23. Hay C. Political analysis. New York: Palgrave; 2002. p. 163-67.
  24. Crotty J. Structural causes of the global financial crisis: a critical assessment of the 'new financial architecture'. Cambridge J Econ 2009; 33(4): 563-580. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep023
  25. ILO. Laborsta Internet. [cited 2010 Mar 10]. Available from: URL: http://laborsta.ilo.org/data_topic_E.html.
  26. International Monetary Fund. IMF approves SDR 15.5 billion stand-by credit for Korea. [cited 2010 Sep 5]. Available from: http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/1997/PR9755.HTM.
  27. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The OECD report on regulatory reform: synthesis. Paris: OECD; 1997.
  28. Kondo S. Press statement on regulatory reform in Korea. Seoul: OECD; 2002.

Cited by

  1. The association between nonstandard work and occupational injury in Korea vol.55, pp.10, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22055
  2. The Vulnerability of Occupational Health and Safety to Deregulation: The Weakening of Information Regulations during the Economic Crisis in Korea vol.28, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1177/1048291117743781