Comparison of Distance of Subacromial Space Using Ultrasonographic Measurement on Arm Positions of Shoulder Injured Patients

견부손상환자의 팔의 자세에 따른 초음파 영상을 이용한 견봉하공간 거리의 비교

  • Jee, Eun-Mi (Department of Physical Therapy, Woory Pain Clinic) ;
  • Kim, Suhn-Yeop (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Natural Science, Daejeon University) ;
  • Park, Ji-Whan (Department of Physical Therapy, Daejeon Health Science College)
  • 지은미 (우리통증클리닉 의원) ;
  • 김선엽 (대전대학교 자연과학대학 물리치료학과) ;
  • 박지환 (대전보건대학 물리치료과)
  • Received : 2011.08.08
  • Accepted : 2011.11.11
  • Published : 2011.11.30

Abstract

Purpose : Recently ultrasound images has been used to measure the subacromial space with a linear measurement of the acromiohumeral distance. The purpose of this study was to comparison of distance of subacromial space using ultrasonographic measurement on arm positions of shoulder injured patients. Methods : The subjects were 30 shoulder injured patients (19 males and 11 females). Ultrasonography was performed to measure subacromial space during each shoulder resting position, $45^{\circ}$ abduction, internal rotation with $45^{\circ}$ abduction and external rotation with $45^{\circ}$ abduction. Results : Subacromial space was a significantly difference between injured arm and normal arm at shoulder resting position. At $45^{\circ}$ abduction, subacromial space was narrowing significantly between injured arm and normal arm. At external rotation with $45^{\circ}$ abduction, subacromial space were wider in normal arm than in injured arm but it was not significantly. Intra-observer reliability for ultrasonography measurement of subacromial distance was excellent (.96~.99). Conclusion : These results identified that positions of injured shoulder was related to subacromion space.

Keywords

References

  1. Azzoni R, Cabitza P, Parrini M. Sonographic evaluation of subacromial space. Ultrasonics. 2004;42(1-9):683-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2003.11.015
  2. Badley EM, Tennant A. Changing profile of joint disorders with age: Findings from a postal survey of the population of Calderdale, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992;51(3):366-71. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.51.3.366
  3. Bigliani LU, Levine WN. Subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(12):1854-68
  4. Bongers PM. The cost of shoulder pain at work. BMJ. 2001;13;322(7278):64-5 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7278.64
  5. Brossmann J, Preidler K, Pedowitz R et al. Shoulder impingement syndrome: Influence of shoulder position on rotator cuff impingement- an anatomic study. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167(6):1511-5 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956588
  6. Cholewinski JJ, Kusz DJ, Wojciechowski P et al. Ultrasound measurement of rotator cuff thickness and acromio-humeral distance in the diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome of the shoulder. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(4):408-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-007-0443-4
  7. Desmeules F, Minville L, Riederer B et al. Acromiohumeral distance variation measured by ultrasonography and its association with the outcome of rehabilitation for shoulder impingement syndrome. Clin J Sport Med. 2004;14(4):197-205. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042752-200407000-00002
  8. Fehringer EV, Rosipal CE, Rhodes DA et al. The radiographic acromiohumeral interval is affected by arm and radiographic beam position. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37(6):535-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0467-y
  9. Girometti R, De Candia A, Sbuelz M et al. Supraspinatus tendon US morphology in basket ballplayers: Correlation with main pathologic models of secondary impingement syndrome in young overhead athletes. Preliminary report. Radiol Med (Torino). 2006;111(1):42-52 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-006-0005-8
  10. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Gleyze P et al. Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(6):550-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(03)00211-8
  11. Graichen H, Hinterwimmer S, Eisenhart-Rothe R et al. Effect of abducting and adducting muscle activity on glenohumeral translation, scapular kinematics and subacromial space width in vivo. J Biomech. 2005;38(4):755-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.020
  12. Gumina S, Di Giorgio G, Postacchini F et al. Subacromial space in adult patients with thoracic hyperkyphosis and in healthy volunteers. Chir Organi Mov. 2008;91(2):93-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-007-0016-1
  13. Hebert LJ, Moffet H, Dufour M et al. Acromiohumeral distance in a seated position in persons with impingement syndrome. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 ;18(1):72-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10327
  14. Inman VT, Saunders JB, Abbott LC. Observations of the function of the shoulder joint. 1944. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;330(1):3-12.
  15. Jost B, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C et al. Clinical outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(3):304-14.
  16. Kalra N, Seitz AL, Boardman ND 3rd et al. Effect of posture on acromiohumeral distance with arm elevation in subjects with and without rotator cuff disease using ultrasonography. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(10):633-40.
  17. Lochmuller EM, Maier U, Anetzberger H et al. Determination of subacromial space width and inferior acromial mineralization by 3D CT. Preliminary data from patients with unilateral supraspinatus outlet syndrome. Surg Radiol Anat. 1997;19(5):329-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01637604
  18. Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJ et al. Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; A systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol. 2004;33(2):73-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009740310004667
  19. Mayer F, Baur H, Hirschmuller A et al. The quantification of reciprocal shoulder strength relation in various working modes at different movement velocities. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2001;9(2-3):73-7.
  20. Mayerhoefer ME, Breitenseher MJ, Wurnig C et al. Shoulder impingement: Relationship of clinical symptoms and imaging criteria. Clin J Sport Med. 2009;19(2):83-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0b013e318198e2e3
  21. Norwood LA, Barrack R, Jacobson KE. Clinical presentation of complete tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(4):499-505.
  22. Nove-Josserand L, Edwards TB, O'Connor DP et al. The acromiohumeral and coracohumeral intervals are abnormal in rotator cuff tears with muscular fatty degeneration. Clin Orthop. 2005;43:90.
  23. Ostor A, Richards C, Prevost A et al. Diagnosis and relation to general health of shoulder disorders presenting to primary care. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44(6):800-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh598
  24. Pappas GP, Blemker SS, Beaulieu CF et al. In vivo anatomy of the Neer and Hawkins sign positions for shoulder impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15(1):40-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.04.007
  25. Peters D, Davies P, Pietroni P. Musculoskeletal clinic in general practice: Study of one year's referrals. Br J Gen Pract. 1994;44(378):25-9.
  26. Roach KE, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N et al. Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res. 1991;4(4):143-9 https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1790040403
  27. Saupe N, Pfirrmann CWA, Schmid MR et al. Association between rotator cuff abnormalities and reduced acromiohumeral distance. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(2):376-82. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0435
  28. Silva RT, Hartmann LG, Laurino CF et al. Clinical and ultrasonographic correlation between scapular dyskinesia and subacromial space measurement among junior elite tennis players. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(6):407-10 https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2008.046284
  29. Smith KL, Harryman I, Douglas T et al. A prospective, multipractice study of shoulder function and health status in patients with documented rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000;9(5):395-402. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2000.108962
  30. Thigpen CA, Padua DA, Morgan N et al. Scapular kinematics during supraspinatus rehabilitation exercise: A comparison of full-can versus empty-can techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(4):644-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505281797
  31. van de Sande MA, Rozing PM. Proximal migration can be measured accurately on standardized anteroposterior shoulder radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;443:260-5 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000196043.34789.73
  32. Wagner DR, Tatsugawa K, Parker D, Young TA. Reliability and utility of a visual analog scale for the assessment of acute mountain sickness. High Alt Med Biol. 2007;8(1):27-31. https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2006.0814
  33. Wilk KE, Arrigo C. Current concepts in the rehabilitation of the athletic shoulder. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;18(1):365-78.
  34. Wilk KE, Macrina LC, Fleisig GS et al. Correlation of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and total rotational motion to shoulder injuries in professional baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(2):329-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510384223
  35. Williams JW Jr, Holleman DR Jr, Simel DL. Measuring shoulder function with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(4):727-32.