초록
인터넷 비즈니스의 활성화에 따라서 기업은 고객의 인물정보 및 거래정보를 활용하여 보다 맞춤화된 개인화 서비스를 제공하고 있다. 기존의 고객군별 예측기법은 유사한 고객들을 군집화하여 고객군별로 예측모델을 수립하는 것으로, 구매가 많고 충성도가 높은 핵심고객에게 요구되는 일대일 서비스를 제공하는 데는 한계가 있다. 반면 일대일 고객별 예측기법은 각 고객에게 고도로 맞춤화된 서비스를 제공하지만, 과거 구매이력이 많지 않은 고객 이나 신규 고객에게는 정확한 개인화 서비스를 제공하지 못한다. 본 연구는 고객의 구매빈도에 따라서 유사 고객들과의 군집화 수준을 동적으로 조정하는 새로운 지능형 개인화 시스템을 제안한다. 제안된 시스템은 과거 구매가 많은 고객들에 대해서는 일대일 예측모델을 수립하지만, 구매 빈도가 낮은 고객의 경우 다른 고객들과의 최적화된 군집화를 통해 예측모델을 수립한다. 본 기법을 Neilsen의 음료수 구매 데이터셋에 적용하여 고객의 일회 구매금액 및 구매품목을 예측한 결과, 기존 두 예측기법들에 비하여 적정한 계산비용(computational cost)으로 더욱 정확한 개안화 서비스를 제공할 수 있음을 확인하였다.
TThis is a study of the personalization method that intelligently adapts the level of clustering considering purchasing index of a customer. In the e-biz era, many companies gather customers' demographic and transactional information such as age, gender, purchasing date and product category. They use this information to predict customer's preferences or purchasing patterns so that they can provide more customized services to their customers. The previous Customer-Segmentation method provides customized services for each customer group. This method clusters a whole customer set into different groups based on their similarity and builds predictive models for the resulting groups. Thus, it can manage the number of predictive models and also provide more data for the customers who do not have enough data to build a good predictive model by using the data of other similar customers. However, this method often fails to provide highly personalized services to each customer, which is especially important to VIP customers. Furthermore, it clusters the customers who already have a considerable amount of data as well as the customers who only have small amount of data, which causes to increase computational cost unnecessarily without significant performance improvement. The other conventional method called 1-to-1 method provides more customized services than the Customer-Segmentation method for each individual customer since the predictive model are built using only the data for the individual customer. This method not only provides highly personalized services but also builds a relatively simple and less costly model that satisfies with each customer. However, the 1-to-1 method has a limitation that it does not produce a good predictive model when a customer has only a few numbers of data. In other words, if a customer has insufficient number of transactional data then the performance rate of this method deteriorate. In order to overcome the limitations of these two conventional methods, we suggested the new method called Intelligent Customer Segmentation method that provides adaptive personalized services according to the customer's purchasing index. The suggested method clusters customers according to their purchasing index, so that the prediction for the less purchasing customers are based on the data in more intensively clustered groups, and for the VIP customers, who already have a considerable amount of data, clustered to a much lesser extent or not clustered at all. The main idea of this method is that applying clustering technique when the number of transactional data of the target customer is less than the predefined criterion data size. In order to find this criterion number, we suggest the algorithm called sliding window correlation analysis in this study. The algorithm purposes to find the transactional data size that the performance of the 1-to-1 method is radically decreased due to the data sparity. After finding this criterion data size, we apply the conventional 1-to-1 method for the customers who have more data than the criterion and apply clustering technique who have less than this amount until they can use at least the predefined criterion amount of data for model building processes. We apply the two conventional methods and the newly suggested method to Neilsen's beverage purchasing data to predict the purchasing amounts of the customers and the purchasing categories. We use two data mining techniques (Support Vector Machine and Linear Regression) and two types of performance measures (MAE and RMSE) in order to predict two dependent variables as aforementioned. The results show that the suggested Intelligent Customer Segmentation method can outperform the conventional 1-to-1 method in many cases and produces the same level of performances compare with the Customer-Segmentation method spending much less computational cost.