DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

카테고리형 태그 기반의 지식조직체계 구현

CTKOS : Categorized Tag-based Knowledge Organization System

  • 유동희 (육군사관학교 이공학처 전자정보학과) ;
  • 김건우 (한밭대학교 경상대학 경영학과) ;
  • 최근호 (고려대학교 경영대학 경영학과) ;
  • 서용무 (고려대학교 경영대학 경영학과)
  • 투고 : 2011.11.18
  • 심사 : 2011.12.15
  • 발행 : 2011.12.31

초록

웹 2.0 환경에서는 사용자 참여를 통한 지식 생산이 증가하고 있으며, 이러한 지식들을 효과적으로 분류하고 공유하기 위한 방법으로 태그 기반의 단일 폭소노미가 활용되고 있다. 그러나 단일 폭소노미를 구성하는 태그들은 단일 태그로 구성되어 있어 그 의미가 불명확하다. 이를 위해 태그간의 관계성이 명시된 구조화된 폭소노미를 구축하는 연구들이 진행되었다. 그러나 이러한 연구들에서도 태그의 의미를 정의하기 위해 미리 정의된 용어집을 사용하기 때문에 용어집에 없는 새로운 태그는 정의할 수 없고, 수작업으로 태그의 의미를 정의할 때 시간이 소요되는 문제점이 발생하였다. 본 연구에서는 사용자가 태그를 입력할 때 입력된 태그가 속할 수 있는 카테고리를 미리 정의된 용어집 없이 자유롭게 정의할 수 있는 카테고리형 태깅 방식을 제안하고자 한다. 또한 사용자들로부터 수집된 카테고리형 태그들을 이용하여 다수의 사용자가 생각하는 태그의 관계를 구조화된 폭소노미에 반영하는 기술을 언급하고자 한다. 끝으로 본 연구에서 제시한 방법들이 조직의 지식 분류와 검색에 활용될 수 있음을 증명하기 위해, 카테고리형 태그 기반의 지식조직체계를 시스템으로 구현하였다.

As more users are willingly participating in the creation of web contents, flat folksonomy using simple tags has emerged as a powerful instrument to classify and share a huge amount of knowledge on the web. However, flat folksonomy has semantic problems, such as ambiguity and misunderstanding of tags. To alleviate such problems, many studies have built structured folksonomy with a hierarchical structure or relationships among tags. However, structured folksonomy also has some fundamental problems, such as limited tagging to pre-defined vocabulary for new tags and the timeconsuming manual effort required for selecting tags. To resolve these problems, we suggested a new method of attaching a categorized tag (CT), followed by its category, to web content. CTs are automatically integrated into collaboratively-built structured folksonomy (CSF) in real time, reflecting the tag-and-category relationships by majority users. Then, we developed a CT-based knowledge organization system (CTKOS), which builds the CSF to classify organizational knowledge and allows us to locate the appropriate knowledge.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abbasi, R., S. Staab, and P. Cimiano, "Organizing resources on tagging systems using TORG", Proceedings of the ESWC 2007 Workshop Bridging the Gap between Semantic Web and Web 2.0, Innsbruck, Austria( 2007), 97-110.
  2. Angeletou, S., M. Sabou, and E. Motta, "Semantically enriching folksonomies with FLOR", Proceedings of the ESWC 2008 Workshop Collective Intelligence and the Semantic Web, Tenerife, Spain, 2008.
  3. Brooks, C. H. and N. Montanez, "Improved Annotation of the Blogopshere via Autotagging and Hierarchical Clustering", Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, Edinburgh, Scotland (2006), 625-632.
  4. Buffa, M., F. Gandon, G. Ereteo, P. Sander, and C. Faron, "SweetWiki : a semantic wiki", Journal of Web Semantics, Vol.6, No.1(2008), 84-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2007.11.003
  5. Golder, S. and B. A. Huberman, "Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems", Journal of Information Science, Vol.32, No.2(2006), 198-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506062337
  6. Gruber, T., "A translation approach to portable ontology specifications", Knowledge Acquisition, Vol.5, No.2(1993), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008
  7. Hammond, T., T. Hannay, B. Lund, and J. Scott, "Social Bookmarking Tools (I) : A General Review", D-Lib Magazine, Vol.11(2005), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april05/hammond/ 04hammond.html.
  8. Hendler, J. and J. Goldbeck, "Metcalfe's law, web 2.0, and the semantic web", Journal of Web Semantics, Vol.6, No.1(2008), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2007.11.008
  9. Hodge, G., "Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries : beyond traditional authority files", CLIR Publications, (2000), http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/pub91abst. html.
  10. Kroski, E., "The Hive Mind : Folksonomies and User-based Tagging", (2005), http://infotan gle.blogsome.com/2005/12/07/the-hive-mind -folksonomies-and-user-based-tagging
  11. Levy, P., Collective intelligence : Mankind's emerging world in cyberspace, Perseus Books, Cambridge, MA, 1999.
  12. Limpens, F., F. Gandon, and M. Buffa, "Helping online communities to semantically enrich folksonomies", Proceedings of the Web Science Conference, Raleigh, NC, USA 2010.
  13. Marchetti, A., M. Tesconi, and F. Ronzano, "Semkey : a semantic collaborative tagging system", Proceedings of the WWW 2007 Workshop Tagging and Metadata for Social Information Organization, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 2007.
  14. Mathes, A., "Folksonomies : Cooperative Classification and Communication through Shared Metadata", 2004, http://www.adammathes. com/academic/computer-mediated-commu nication/folksonomies.html.
  15. Matthews, B., C. Jones, B. Puzon, J. Moon, D. Tudhope, K. Golub, and M. L. Nielsen, "An evaluation of enhancing social tagging with a knowledge organization system", Aslib Proceedings, Vol.62, No.4/5(2010), 447-465. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531011074690
  16. McGuinness, D. L. and F. V. Harmelen, OWL Web Ontology Language Overview (W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004), http:// www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.
  17. Mika, P., "Ontologies Are Us : A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics", Journal of Web Semantics, Vol.5, No.1(2007), 5 -15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2006.11.002
  18. Pan, J. Z., S. Taylor, and E. Thomas, "Reducing ambiguity in tagging systems with folksonomy search expansion", Proceedings of the 6th European Semantic Web Conference, Heraklion, Greece, (2009), 669-683.
  19. Passant, A., "Using ontologies to strengthen folksonomies and enrich information retrieval in weblogs", Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Colorado, USA, 2007.
  20. Quintarelli, E., "Folksonomies : power to the people", Proceedings of the 1st International Society for Knowledge Organization, Milan, Italy 2005, http://www.iskoi.org/doc/folkson omies.htm.
  21. Shirky, C., "Ontology is Overrated : Categories, Links, and Tags", 2005, http://www.shirky. com/writings/ontology_overrated.html.
  22. Specia, L. and E. Motta, "Integrating folksonomies with the semantic web", Proceedings of the 4th European Semantic Web conference, Innsbruck, Austria, 2007.
  23. Spyns, P., A. Moor, J. Vandenbussche, and R. Meersman, "From folksologies to ontologies : how the twain meet", Proceedings of the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006 : CooPIS, DOA and ODBASE, Montpellier, France, (2006), 738-755.
  24. Tapscott, D. and A. D. Williams, Wikinomics : How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything, Penguin, New York, 2006.
  25. Weinberger, D., "Taxonomies and tags : from trees to piles of leaves", Esther Dyson's Monthly Report, Vol.23(2005), 1-36.
  26. Weiss, A., "The power of collective intelligence", netWorker, Vol.9(2009), 16-23.
  27. Weller, K., "Folksonomies and ontologies : two new players in indexing and knowledge representation", Proceedings of Online Information, London, Great Britain (2007), 108- 115.
  28. Weller, K., I. Peters, and W. G. Stock, "Folksonomy : the collaborative knowledge organization system", In : Dumova T and Fiordo R (eds.) Handbook of Research on Social Interaction Technologies and Collaborative Software : Concepts and Trends, New York, USA, (2010), 132-146.

피인용 문헌

  1. 법령정보 검색을 위한 생활용어와 법률용어 간의 대응관계 탐색 방법론 vol.18, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2012.18.3.137
  2. 효율적 자원 탐색을 위한 소셜 웹 태그들을 이용한 동적 가상 온톨로지 생성 연구 vol.19, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2013.19.1.033
  3. WordNet기반의 형식개념분석기법을 이용한 사용자태그 분류체계의 구축 vol.18, pp.10, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2013.18.10.149