DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A comparative study on the initial stability of different implants placed above the bone level using resonance frequency analysis

  • Kang, In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Whe (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lim, Young-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2011.05.25
  • Accepted : 2011.08.08
  • Published : 2011.12.30

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study evaluated the initial stability of different implants placed above the bone level in different types of bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS. As described by Lekholm and Zarb, cortical layers of bovine bone specimens were trimmed to a thickness of 2 mm, 1 mm or totally removed to reproduce bone types II, III, and IV respectively. Three Implant system (Br${\aa}$nemark System$^{(R)}$ Mk III TiUnite$^{TM}$, Straumann Standard Implant SLA$^{(R)}$, and Astra Tech Microthread$^{TM}$-OsseoSpeed$^{TM}$) were tested. Control group implants were placed in level with the bone, while test group implants were placed 1, 2, 3, and 4 mm above the bone level. Initial stability was evaluated by resonance frequency analysis. Data was statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance in confidence level of 95%. The effective implant length and the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) were compared using simple linear regression analysis. RESULTS. In the control group, there was a significant difference in the ISQ values of the 3 implants in bone types III and IV (P<.05). The ISQ values of each implant decreased with increased effective implant length in all types of bone. In type II bone, the decrease in ISQ value per 1-mm increase in effective implant length of the Br${\aa}$nemark and Astra implants was less than that of the Straumann implant. In bone types III and IV, this value in the Astra implant was less than that in the other 2 implants. CONCLUSION. The initial stability was much affected by the implant design in bone types III, IV and the implant design such as the short pitch interval was beneficial to the initial stability of implants placed above the bone level.

Keywords

References

  1. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Osseointegration: A requiem for the periodontal ligament. Int J Periodontic Restorative Dent 1991; 11:88-91.
  2. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:142-6.
  3. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  4. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:85-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00110.x
  5. West JD, Oates TW. Identification of stability changes for immediately placed dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:623-30.
  6. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2-review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:544-64.
  7. Ostman PO, Hellman M, Wendelhag I, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency analysis measurements of implants at placement surgery. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:77-83; discussion 84.
  8. Balshi SF, Allen FD, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. A resonance frequency analysis assessment of maxillary and mandibular immediately loaded implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:584-94.
  9. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:261-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x
  10. OsstellTM mentor Resonance Frequency Analyser. User`s manual. Integration Diagnostics Ltd., Sweden.
  11. Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A crosssectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:226-33. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080309.x
  12. Adell R, Lekholm U, Branemark PI. Surgical procedures. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue integrated prostheses. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago; Quintessence, 1985. p. 199-210.
  13. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St Louis, Mo: CV Mosby; 1993. p. 327-54.
  14. Johansson P, Strid KG. Assessment of bone quality from cutting resistance duringimplant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:279-88.
  15. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J, Johansson P, Strid CG, Lekholm U. Evaluation of bone density using cutting resistance measurements and microradiography: an in vitro study in pig ribs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:164-71. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060305.x
  16. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J, Lekholm U. Identification of bone quality in conjunction with insertion of titanium implants. A pilot study in jaw autopsy specimens. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:213-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060403.x
  17. Carr AB, Papazoglou E, Larsen PE. The relationship of Periotest values, biomaterial, and torque to failure in adult baboons. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:15-20.
  18. Manz M, Morris HF, Ochi S. An evaluation of the Periotest system. Part I: Examiner reliability and repeatability of readings. Dental Implant Clinical Group (Planning Committee). Implant Dent 1992;1:142-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199205000-00006
  19. Olive J, Aparicio C. Periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:390-400.
  20. van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M. Reproducibility and detection thresthold of periimplant diagnostics. Adv Dent Res 1993;7:191-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374930070021001
  21. van Steenberghe D, Tricio J, Naert I, Nys M. Damping characteristics of bone-to-implant interfaces. A clinical study with the Periotest device. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:31-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060104.x
  22. Teerlinck J, Quirynen M, Darius P, van Steenberghe D. Periotest: an objective clinical diagnosis of bone apposition toward implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:55-61.
  23. Schulte W, d'Hoedt B, Lukas D, Muhlbradt L, Scholz F, Bretschi J, Frey D, Gudat H, Konig M, Markl M. Periotest - a new measurement process for periodontal function. Zahnartzl Mitt 1983;73:1229-40.
  24. Derhami K, Wolfaardt JF, Faulkner G, Grace M. Assessment of the periotest device in baseline mobility measurements of craniofacial implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:221-9.
  25. Niimi A, Ozeki K, Ueda M, Nakayama B. A comparative study of removal torque of endosseous implants in the fibula, iliac crest and scapula of cadavers: preliminary report. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:286-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080406.x
  26. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Resonance frequency analysis: measuring implant stability and osseointegration. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19:493-8, 500, 502; quiz 504.
  27. Meredith N, Shagaldi F, Alleyne D, Sennerby L, Cawley P. The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:234-43. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080310.x
  28. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501.
  29. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Analisi della Frequenza di Risonanza (RFA). Osteointegrazione e carico immediato 2002;19-32.
  30. Zix J, Kessler-Liechti G, Mericske-Stern R. Stability measurements of 1-stage implants in the maxilla by means of resonance frequency analysis: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:747-52.

Cited by

  1. Measurement of mini-implant stability using resonance frequency analysis vol.83, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2319/043012-354.1
  2. Reliability of Resonance Frequency Analysis as an Indicator of Implant Micromotion vol.25, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000498
  3. Mini-implant stability at the initial healing period: A clinical pilot study vol.84, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2319/040813-271.1
  4. Mini-implant stability at the initial healing period: A clinical pilot study vol.84, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2319/040813-271.1
  5. Novel expandable short dental implants in situations with reduced vertical bone height—technical note and first results vol.3, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0107-1