Methodologies of Duty Cycle Application in Weapon System Reliability Prediction

무기체계 신뢰도 예측시 임무주기 적용 방안에 대한 연구

  • Yun, Hui-Sung (Maintenance Technology Research Center, Consolidated Maintenance Depot, ROK Army) ;
  • Jeong, Da-Un (Maintenance Technology Research Center, Consolidated Maintenance Depot, ROK Army) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Hak (Maintenance Technology Research Center, Consolidated Maintenance Depot, ROK Army) ;
  • Kang, Tae-Won (Maintenance Technology Research Center, Consolidated Maintenance Depot, ROK Army) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Hun (Maintenance Technology Research Center, Consolidated Maintenance Depot, ROK Army) ;
  • Hur, Man-Og (Maintenance Technology Research Center, Consolidated Maintenance Depot, ROK Army)
  • 윤희성 (육군 종합정비창 정비기술연구소) ;
  • 정다운 (육군 종합정비창 정비기술연구소) ;
  • 이은학 (육군 종합정비창 정비기술연구소) ;
  • 강태원 (육군 종합정비창 정비기술연구소) ;
  • 이승헌 (육군 종합정비창 정비기술연구소) ;
  • 허만옥 (육군 종합정비창 정비기술연구소)
  • Received : 2011.08.11
  • Accepted : 2011.12.02
  • Published : 2011.12.25

Abstract

Duty cycle is determined as the ratio of operating time to total time. Duty cycle in reliability prediction is one of the significant factors to be considered. In duty cycle application, non-operating time failure rate has been easily ignored even though the failure rate in non-operating period has not been proved to be small enough. Ignorance of non-operating time failure rate can result in over-estimated system reliability calculation. Furthermore, utilization of duty cycle in reliability prediction has not been evaluated in its effectiveness. In order to address these problems, two reliability models, such as MIL-HDBK-217F and RIAC-HDBK-217Plus, were used to analyze non-operating time failure rate. This research has proved that applying duty cycle in 217F model is not reasonable by the quantitative comparison and analysis.

Keywords

References

  1. Department of Defense (2005), DoD Guide For Achieving Reliability, Availability, And Maintainability "System Engineering for Mission Success"
  2. Department of Defense (1981), MIL-STD-756B, Reliability Modeling and Prediction
  3. Reliability Information Analysis Center (2005), System Reliability Toolkit
  4. Parametric Technology Corporation (2010), Relex 2011 Enterprise Edition
  5. Department of Defense (1991), MIL-HDBK-217F, Prediction of Electronic Equipment
  6. Rome Air Development Center (1985), Impact of Nonoperating Periods on Equipment Reliability
  7. System Reliability Center (1998), PRISM System Reliability Assessment Software Tool
  8. Reliability Information Analysis Center (2006), RIAC-HDBK-217Plus, Reliability Prediction Models
  9. Department of Defense (2009), Reliability, Availability, Maintainability, and Cost Rationale Report Manual
  10. Department of Defense (1998), Electronic Reliability Design Handbook
  11. TACOM Life Cycle Management Command (2011), Operational Mode Summary/Mission Profile(OMS/MP) Annex to Purchase Description for Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Family of Vehicles Version 2.7