DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Korean Mathematics Teacher Educators' Response on the Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument

  • Ryang, Do-Hyoung (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro) ;
  • Thompson, Tony (Department of Mathematics, East Carolina University) ;
  • Shwery, Craig (Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Alabama)
  • Received : 2011.08.23
  • Accepted : 2011.09.26
  • Published : 2011.09.30

Abstract

The Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument is one of the most popular instruments used to measure elementary preservice teachers' efficacy beliefs in mathematics teaching. The instrument was, however, developed in the United States and is perhaps not appropriate for other cultures. In this study, the instrument was translated into Korean and carefully reviewed by Korean mathematics teacher education professors. Analysis of the review indicated that eight out of the 21 items were appropriate while the others needed to be revised. Items were identified as inappropriate due to awkwardness, multiple meanings, tense disagreements, and vagueness. These items were modified to better fit the Korean context. The instrument was revised with two versions: one for elementary and the other for secondary pre service teachers.

Keywords

References

  1. Alkhateeb, H. M. (2004). Internal consistency reliability and validity of the Arabic translation of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. Psychological Reports 94. 833-838. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.94.3.833-838
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84(2),191-215. ERIC EJ161632 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
  4. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1, 185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
  5. Enochs, L. G. & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and mathematics 90(8), 694-706. EIRC EJ419040 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12048.x
  6. Enochs, L. G.; Smith, P. L. & Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument, School Science and Mathematics 100(4), 194-202. ERIC EJ607161 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17256.x
  7. Gibson, S. & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology 76(4), 569-582. ERIC EJ306050 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569
  8. Gresham, G. (2008). Mathematics anxiety and mathematics teacher efficacy in elementary preservice teachers. Teaching Education 19(3), 171-184. ERIC EJ811912 https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210802250133
  9. Lin, H. L. & Gorrell, J. (2001). Exploratory analysis of pre-service teacher efficacy in Taiwan. Teaching and Teacher Education 17(5),623-635. ERIC EJ631721 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00018-X
  10. Ryang, D. (2007). Soohak gyosoo hyonunngam dogoo MTEBI hangulpanui sinroidowa tadangdo. [Reliability and validity of the Korean-translated mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument MTEBI]. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series A: The Mathematical Education 46(3), 263-272.
  11. Sperber, A. D.; Devellis, R. F. & Boehlecke, B. (1994). Cross-cultural translation: Methodology and validation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 25, 501-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022194254006
  12. Swars, S. L. (2005). Examining perceptions of mathematics teaching effectiveness among elementary preservice teachers with differing levels of mathematics teacher efficacy. Journal of Instructional Psychology 32(2), 139-147. ERIC EJ774152
  13. Swars, S. L.; Daane, C. J. & Giesen, J. (2006). Mathematics anxiety and mathematics teacher efficacy: What is the relationship in elementary preservice teachers? School Science and Mathematics 106(7),306-315. ERIC EJ775612 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb17921.x
  14. Swars, S. L.; Smith, S. Z.; Smith, M. E. & Hart, L. C. (2009). A longitudinal study of effects of a developmental teacher preparation program on elementary prospective teachers' mathematics beliefs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 12(1),47-66. ERIC EJ826882 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9092-x
  15. Tschannen-Moran, M. & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education 17(7),783-805. ERIC EJ640149 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
  16. Tschannen-Moran, M.; Woolfolk Hoy, A. & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research 68(2), 202-248. ERIC EJ574601 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202
  17. Utley, J.; Bryant, R. & Moseley, C. (2005). Relationship between science and mathematics teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics 105(2), 82-87. ERIC EJ710923 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18040.x
  18. Wang, W. L.; Lee, H. L. & Fetzer, S. J. (2006). Challenged and Strategies of Instrument Translation. Western Journal of Nursing Research 28, 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945905284712