HiMang: Highly Manageable Network and Service Architecture for New Generation

  • Choi, Tae-Sang (Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)) ;
  • Lee, Tae-Ho (Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)) ;
  • Kodirov, Nodir (Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Gi (Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)) ;
  • Kim, Do-Yeon (Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)) ;
  • Kang, Joon-Myung (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Su (Division of IT Convergence Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)) ;
  • Strassner, John (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)) ;
  • Hong, James Won-Ki (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH))
  • Received : 2011.09.28
  • Published : 2011.12.31

Abstract

The Internet is a very successful modern technology and is considered to be one of the most important means of communication. Despite that success, fundamental architectural and business limitations exist in the Internet's design. Among these limitations, we focus on a specific issue, the lack of manageability, in this paper. Although it is generally understood that management is a significant and important part of network and service design, it has not been considered as an integral part in their design phase. We address this problem with our future Internet management architecture called highly manageable network and service architecture for new generation (HiMang), which is a novel architecture that aims at integrating management capabilities into network and service design. HiMang is highly manageable in the sense that it is autonomous, scalable, robust, and evolutionary while reducing the complexity of network management. Unlike any other management framework, HiMang provides management support for the revolutionary networks of the future while maintaining backward compatibility for existing networks.

Keywords

References

  1. P. Dimitri and Z. Theodore, "Future Internet design principles," FP7 Future Internet Architecture Working Group, Mar. 2011.
  2. J. Strassner, "Autonomic networking-theory and practice," in Proc. NOMS 2008 Tutorial, Brazil, Apr. 7, 2008.
  3. AUTOI. [Online]. Avaliable: http://ist-autoi.eu
  4. J. Strassner, N. Agoulmine, and E. Lehtihet, "FOCALE-a novel autonomic networking architecture," in Proc. ITSSA J., vol. 3, no. 1, May 2007, pp.64-79.
  5. J. Strassner, "Policy based network management," Morgan Kaufman, 2004.
  6. 4WARD. [Online]. Avaliable: http://www.4ward-project.eu
  7. FAME. [Online]. Avaliable: http://www.fame.ie
  8. J. Strassner, "Introduction to DEN-ng," Tutorial for FP7 PanLab II Project, 2009.
  9. A. Greenberg, G. Hjalmtysson, D. A. Maltz, A. Myers, and J. Rexford, "A clean slate 4D approach to network control and management," in Proc. SIGCOMM CCR., vol. 35, no. 5, 2005.
  10. P. Francis and J. Lepreau. Towards complexity-oblivious network management. NSF NeTS-FIND Initiative. [Online]. Avaliable: http://www.netsfind. netlFundedITowards Complexity.php
  11. FP6 Situated Autonomic Communications and other relevant FET Projects. [Online]. Avaliable: http://cordis.europa.eulfp7/ictlfire/futureinternet- projects_en.htrnl
  12. J. Strassner, J. W. Hong, and S. van der Meer, "The design of an autonomic element for managing emerging networks and services," in Proc. ICUMT, St. Petersburg, Russia, Oct. 2009.
  13. M. Minsky, The Society of Mind. Simon and Schuster, New YorkNY, 1988.
  14. J. Famaey, S. Latre, J. Strassner, and F. De Turck, "A hierarchical approach to autonomic network management," in Proc. IEEE/IFlP NOMS, Apr. 2010, pp. 225-232.
  15. B. Lee, Y. Jeongm, H. Song, and Y. Lee, "A scalable and highly available network management architecture," in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM 2010
  16. M. Choi, J. W. Hong, and H. Ju, "XML-based network management for IP networks," ETRI J., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 445-463, Dec. 2003. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.03.0103.0062
  17. A. Feldmann, "Internet clean-slate design: What and why?," IEEEIACM SIGCOM Computer Commun. Rev., vol. 37, no. 3, July 2007.
  18. M. Blumenthal and D. Clark, "Rethinking the design of the Internet: The end to end arguments vs. the brave new world," IEEE/ACM Trans. Internet Technol., vol 1, no. 1, pp. 70-109, Aug. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1145/383034.383037
  19. J. Strassner, M. O Foghl$A^o$, W. Donnelly, and N. Agoulmine, "Beyond the knowledge plane: An inference plane to support the next generation Internet," in Proc. IEEE GlIS, July 2-6, 2007, pp. 112-119.
  20. S. Kim, Y. Won, M. Choi, J. Hong, and J. Strassner, "Towards management of the future Internet,"in Proc. IEEE/IFIP ManFl, Long Island, NY, USA, June 5, 2009, pp. 1-6.
  21. C. Tang, M. Steinder, M. Spreitzer, and G. Pacifici, "A scalable application placement controller for enterprise data centers," in Proc. Int. Conf. World Wide Web, 2007, pp. 331-340.
  22. G. Flake, R. Tarjan, and K. Tsioutisiouliklis, "Graph clustering and minimum cut trees," Internet Mathematics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 385-408, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427951.2004.10129093