DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prediction of Rice Yield and Economic Thresholds by Some Weeds-Rice Competition in Transplanted Rice Cultivation

벼 기계이앙 재배에서 벼와 잡초 경합에 따른 벼 수량 및 요방제수준 예측

  • 문병철 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 원종건 (경북농업기술원 영양고추시험장) ;
  • 김영림 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 김성우 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 이인용 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 박재읍 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 김도순 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학)
  • Received : 2011.09.06
  • Accepted : 2011.09.23
  • Published : 2011.09.30

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to predict rice yield losses caused by Echinochloa crus-galli (L.)P. Beauv., Bidens frondosa L. and Aeschynomeme indica L. at a range of plant densities under machine transplanted rice cultivation in different regions of Korea in 2006, and to determine their economic threshold levels (ET). All data were fitted to Cousens' rectangular hyperbola to estimate parameters for predicting rice yield loss. The rice yield loss models of Bidens frondosa L. was predicted as y=5.43/(1+0.0113x), $R^2$=0.963, A. indica was y=5.47/(1+0.0332x), $R^2$=0.976 and E. crus-galli y=5.43/(1+0.01552x), $R^2$=0.950. The mean competitivities represented by the parameter, whose reciprocal ($1/{\beta}$) is a weed density reducing crop yield by 50%. Those of E. crus-galli, B. frondosa and A. indica were 0.01552, 0.01113 and 0.0332 in normal-season machine transplanting of Korea, respectively. Single year mean economic thresholds (ET) of A. indica were 0.5, 0.6 and 0.7 plant $m^{-2}$ with the application of flucetosulfuron, flucetosulfuron+imazosulfuron GR and flucetosulfuron+imazosulfuron+carfentrazone GR herbicides, respectively. Meanwhile ET values of 1.6, 1.9 and 1.9 plants $m^{-2}$ for B. frondosa, 1.2, 1.4, and 1.4 plants $m^{-2}$ for E. crus-galli.

본 연구는 벼에 대한 피, 자귀풀과 미국가막사리의 경합에 따른 수량피해 예측과 경제적인 잡초관리를 위한 방제필요 밀도를 구명하고자 하였다. 수원과 대구지역에서 얻어진 성적을 종합한 예측모델식에 따르면 논에서 피, 자귀풀, 미국가막사리가 완전히 방제되었을 때의 쌀수량은 각각 5.5t, 5.5t, 5.4t 으로 예측되었다. 초종별 평방미터당 요방제 필요밀도는 자귀풀은 제초제 종류별로 0.5~0.7본, 피는 1.2~1.4본, 미국가막사리는 1.6~1.9본인 것으로 예측되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cusens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Annals of Applied Biology 107:239-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1985.tb01567.x
  2. Cousens, R. 1987. Theory and reality of weed control thresholds. Plant Prot. Q. 2:13-20.
  3. Cowan, P., S. E. Weaver, and C. J. Swanton. 1998. Interference between pigweed (Amaranthus spp.), barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli), and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 46:533-539.
  4. Kim, D. S., P. Brain, E. J. P. Marshall and J. C. Caseley. 2002. Modelling herbicide dose and weed density effects on crop-weed competition. Weed Research 42:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2002.00253.x
  5. Kretschmer, A. E. and R. C. Bullock. 1980. Aeschynomene spp. : Distribution and potential use. Proceedings of the Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida 39:145-152.
  6. Kropff, M. J. and C. J. T. Spitters. 1991. A simple model of crop loss by weed competition from early observations on relative leaf area of weeds. Weed Research 31:97-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1991.tb01748.x
  7. Lindquist, J. L., D. A. Mortensen, S. A. Clay, R. Schmenk, J. J. Kells, K. Howatt and P. Westra. 1996. Stability of corn (Zea mays)-velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference relationships. Weed Sci. 44:309-313.
  8. Ni, H., M. Keith and P. R. Restituta. 2004. Analysis of competition between wet-seeded rice and barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli) using a response-surface model. Weed Sci. 52:142-146. https://doi.org/10.1614/P2002-148
  9. Smith, R. J. 1983. Weeds of major economic importance in rice and yield losses due to weed competition. In : Proceedings of the Conference on Weed Control in Rice, IRRI, LosBanos, Philippines, 19-36.
  10. Swaton, C. J. and S. D. Murphy. 1996. Weed science beyond the weeds : the role of integrated weed management (IWM) in agroecosystem health. Weed Sci. 44:437-445.
  11. Vandevender, K. W., T. A. Costello and R. J. Smith. 1997. Model of rice (Oryza sativa) yield reduction as a function of weed interference. Weed Sci. 42:218-224.

Cited by

  1. Growth Responses of Rice and Barnyardgrass Varieties to Flooding at Early Growing Period vol.59, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2014.59.3.239