References
- Baker, V., and Millar, R. (1999). Students' reasoning about chemical reactions: what changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 645-665. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290499
- Cajas, F. (1999). Public understanding of science: using technology to enhance school science in everyday life. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 765-773. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290426
- Campbell, B., Lubben, F., and Dlamini, Z. (2000). Learning science through contexts: helping pupils make sense of everyday situations. International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289859
- Choi, J., & Song, J. (1996). Students' preferences for different contexts for learning science. Research in Science Education, 26(3), 341-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356944
- Darian, S. (2003). Understanding the Language of Science. (Austin: University of Texas Press).
- Dlamini, B., Lubben, F., & Campbell, B. (1996). Liked and disliked learning activities: Responses of swazi students to science materials with a technological approach. Research in Science & Technological Education, 14(2), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514960140208
- Keeves, L., & Aikenhead, G. (1995). Science curricula in a changing world. In B.J. Fraser & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Improving Science Education (pp. 13-45). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Kim. H., & Lee, B. (2006). Why do secondary students perceive physics is uninteresting and difficult? Sae Mulli (The Korean Physical Society), 52(6), 521-529.
- Koch, A. (2001). Training in metacognition and comprehension of physics texts. Science Education, 85, 758-768. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1037
- Korean Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation [KICE] (2004, December 14). 2005 the results of scoring the CSAT (College Scholastic Ability Test). Retrieved February 10, 2007, from http://www.kice.re.kr/kice/article/news/bidinfo/list
- Korean Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation [KICE] (2005, December 19). 2006 the results of scoring the CSAT (College Scholastic Ability Test). Retrieved February 10, 2007, from http://www.kice.re.kr/kice/article/news/bidinfo/list
- Korean Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation [KICE] (2006, December 14). 2007 the results of scoring the CSAT (College Scholastic Ability Test). Retrieved February 10, 2007, from http://www.kice.re.kr/kice/article/news/bidinfo/list
- Lee, H., & Park, J. (unpublished). Helping Students' Conceptual Understanding about the Relationship between Force and Motion Using Deductive Explanation Tasks in Classroom.
- Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. (London: Ablex Publishing).
- Lubben, F., Campbell, P., & Dlamini, B. (1996). Contextualizing science teaching in Swaziland: some student reactions. International Journal of science Education, 18(3), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180304
- Martin, M.O., Mullis, Ina V.S., Gonzalez, E.J., and Chrostowski, S.J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 International science Report. Retrieved February 10, 2007, from http://isc.bc.edu/PDF/t03_download/T03INTLSCIRPT.pdf.
- Mayoh, K. and Knutton, S. (1997). Using out-of-school experience in science lesson: reality or rhetoric? International Journal of Science Education, 19(7), 849-867. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190708
- Milner, B. (1986). Why teach science and why to all? In J. Nellist & B. Nicholl (Eds.), ASE Science teachers' Handbook (pp. 1-39). London: Hutchinson.
- Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development. (1997). High School Curriculum (1): Report No. 1997-15. Seoul, Korea: DaeHan Textbook, Inc.
- Olsher, G., Doar Beit Berl, and Dreyfus, A. (1999). Biotechnologies as a context for enhancing junior high-school students' ability to ask meaningful questions about abstract biological processes. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290750
- Osborne, J. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
- Otero, J., Leon, J.A. & Graesser, A.C. (2002). The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension. (London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers).
- Park, J, & Lee, I. (2004). Analyzing cognitive or non-cognitive factors involved in the process of physics problem-solving in everyday context. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1577-1595. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000230767
- Ramsden, J. (1994). Context and activity-based science in action. School Science and Review, 75(272), 7-14.
- Ramsden, J. (1997). How does a context-based approach influence understanding of key chemical ideas at 16+. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 697-710. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190606
- Schecker, H. (1992). The paradigmatic change in mechanics: Implications of historical processes for physics education. Science & Education, 1(1), 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430210
- Spall, K., Stanisstreet, M., Dickson, D. & Boyes, E. (2004). Development of school students' constructions of biology and physics. International Journal of Science Education, 26(7), 787-803. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000097442
- Whitelegg, E., & Parry M. (1999). Real-life contexts for learning physics: meanings, issues and practice. Physics Education, 32(2), 68-72.
- Wilkinson, J.W. (1999a). The contextual approach to teaching physics. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(4), 43-50.
- Wilkinson, J.W. (1999b). Teachers' perceptions of the contextual approach to teaching VCE physics. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(2), 58-65.