Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine

  • 제38권1호
  • /
  • Pages.53-60
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 2233-8233(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-8241(eISSN)
대한생식의학회 (The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of elective single cleavage-embryo transfer to elective single blastocyst-embryo transfer in human IVF-ET

  • 투고 : 2011.01.17
  • 심사 : 2011.02.25
  • 발행 : 2011.03.02
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: This study was carried out to compare the clinical outcome of elective single cleavage-embryo transfer (eSCET) to that of elective single blastocyst-embryo transfer (eSBET) in human IVF-ET. Methods: This study was a retrospective study which analyzed for 614 women who visited the Daegu Maria Clinic from August 2008 to December 2009. All were under 37 years old and had more than 8 mm of endometrial thickness on the day of hCG administration and at least one good quality embryo on day 3. The eSCETs were performed on day 3 (n=450) and the eSBETs were conducted on day 5 (n=164). Results: The numbers of retrieved oocytes, fertilized oocytes, and day 3 good quality embryos were significantly lower in the eSCET group (12.1${\pm}$6.0, 8.2${\pm}$4.6, and 4.2${\pm}$3.1, respectively) compared to the eSBET group (16.7${\pm}$7.2, 12.1${\pm}$5.0, and 8.5${\pm}$4.5, respectively; p<0.001). However, the clinical pregnancy, implantation, on-going pregnancy, and live birth rates of the eSCET group (46.7, 46.9, 40.0, and 36.7%, respectively) were not statistically different from those of the eSBET group (51.2, 51.8, 45.1, and 43.9%, respectively; p=0.318, 0.278, 0.254, and 0.103, respectively). Conclusion: These results suggested that elective single embryo transfer should be performed regardless of the developmental stage to women less than 37 years old who had more than 8 mm of endometrial thickness on the hCG administration day and at least one good quality embryo on day 3 in order to reduce the twin pregnancy rate without reducing the whole pregnancy rate.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Andersen AN, Goossens V, Ferraretti AP, Bhattacharya S, Felberbaum R, de Mouzon J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2008;23:756-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den014
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2006 Assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports. Atlanta (GA): Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008.
  3. ART committee; Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Current status of assisted reproductive technology in Korea, 2006. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2009;52:1212-38.
  4. Socialstyrelsen. 2004 Official statistics of Sweden [Internet]. Stockholm, SE: National Board of Health and Welfare; 2010 [cited 2010 Dec 2]. Available from: http://http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/
  5. Kang SM, Lee SW, Jeong HJ, Chae SJ, Yoon SH, Lim JH, et al. Clinical outcome of elective single embryo transfer compared to elective double embryo transfer performed at the cleavage stage. Korean J Reprod Med 2010;37:349-59.
  6. Nygren KG. Single embryo transfer: the role of natural cycle/minimal stimulation IVF in the future. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14:626-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61056-5
  7. De Sutter P, Van der Elst J, Coetsier T, Dhont M. Single embryo transfer and multiple pregnancy rate reduction in IVF/ICSI: a 5- year appraisal. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;6:464-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62169-4
  8. Tiitinen A, Unkila-Kallio L, Halttunen M, Hyden-Granskog C. Impact of elective single embryo transfer on the twin pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1449-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg301
  9. Henman M, Catt JW, Wood T, Bowman MC, de Boer KA, Jansen RP. Elective transfer of single fresh blastocysts and later transfer of cryostored blastocysts reduces the twin pregnancy rate and can improve the in vitro fertilization live birth rate in younger women. Fertil Steril 2005;84:1620-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.064
  10. Milki AA, Hinckley MD, Gebhardt J, Dasig D, Westphal LM, Behr B. Accuracy of day 3 criteria for selecting the best embryos. Fertil Steril 2002;77:1191-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03104-7
  11. Rijnders PM, Jansen CA. The predictive value of day 3 embryo morphology regarding blastocyst formation, pregnancy and implantation rate after day 5 transfer following in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998;13:2869- 73. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.10.2869
  12. Bavister BD. Culture of preimplantation embryos: facts and artifacts. Hum Reprod Update 1995;1:91-148. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/1.2.91
  13. Gardner DK, Surrey E, Minjarez D, Leitz A, Stevens J, Schoolcraft WB. Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2004;81:551-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.07.023
  14. Guerif F, Lemseffer M, Bidault R, Gasnier O, Saussereau MH, Cadoret V, et al. Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1051-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep018
  15. Papanikolaou EG, Camus M, Kolibianakis EM, Van Landuyt L, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst- stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1139-46. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa053524
  16. Zech NH, Lejeune B, Puissant F, Vanderzwalmen S, Zech H, Vanderzwalmen P. Prospective evaluation of the optimal time for selecting a single embryo for transfer: day 3 versus day 5. Fertil Steril 2007;88:244-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.070
  17. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998;13:3434-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434
  18. Magli MC, Jones GM, Gras L, Gianaroli L, Korman I, Trounson AO. Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in vitro. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1781-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.8.1781
  19. Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E, Michiels A, Tournaye H, Camus M, et al. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2849-58. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh536
  20. Blake DA, Proctor M, Johnson NP. The merits of blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod 2004;19:795-807. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh104
  21. Rienzi L, Ubaldi F, Iacobelli M, Ferrero S, Minasi MG, Martinez F, et al. Day 3 embryo transfer with combined evaluation at the pronuclear and cleavage stages compares favourably with day 5 blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1852-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.7.1852
  22. Tsirigotis M. Blastocyst stage transfer: pitfalls and benefits. Too soon to abandon current practice? Hum Reprod 1998;13:3285-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.12.3285
  23. Behr B, Fisch JD, Racowsky C, Miller K, Pool TB, Milki AA. Blastocyst- ET and monozygotic twinning. J Assist Reprod Genet 2000; 17:349-51. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009461213139
  24. Menezo YJ, Chouteau J, Torello J, Girard A, Veiga A. Birth weight and sex ratio after transfer at the blastocyst stage in humans. Fertil Steril 1999;72:221-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00256-3
  25. Maher ER, Brueton LA, Bowdin SC, Luharia A, Cooper W, Cole TR, et al. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and assisted reproduction technology (ART). J Med Genet 2003;40:62-4. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.40.1.62
  26. Yoon HG, Yoon SH, Son WY, Kim JG, Im KS, Lim JH. Alternative embryo transfer on day 3 or day 5 for reducing the risk of multiple gestations. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001;18:262-7. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016651016502
  27. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, editors. Towards reproductive certainty: infertility and genetics beyond 1999. The plenary proceedings the 11th World Congress on In Vitro Fertilization and Human Reproductive Genetics. New York: Parthenon Pub. Group; 1999. p. 378-88.
  28. Miller JE, Smith TT. The effect of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and semen parameters on blastocyst development in vitro. Hum Reprod 2001;16:918-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.5.918
  29. Hall JG. Twinning. Lancet 2003;362:735-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14237-7
  30. Lopriore E, Stroeken H, Sueters M, Meerman RJ, Walther F, Vandenbussche F. Term perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: a retrospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87:541-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340802050668
  31. da Costa AA, Abdelmassih S, de Oliveira FG, Abdelmassih V, Abdelmassih R, Nagy ZP, et al. Monozygotic twins and transfer at the blastocyst stage after ICSI. Hum Reprod 2001;16:333-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.2.333
  32. Milki AA, Jun SH. Ectopic pregnancy rates with day 3 versus day 5 embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2003;3:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-3-7
  33. Strandell A, Thorburn J, Hamberger L. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 1999;71:282-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00441-5
  34. Fanchin R, Ayoubi JM, Righini C, Olivennes F, Schonauer LM, Frydman R. Uterine contractility decreases at the time of blastocyst transfers. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1115-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.6.1115
  35. Schoolcraft WB, Surrey ES, Gardner DK. Embryo transfer: techniques and variables affecting success. Fertil Steril 2001;76:863-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02731-5
  36. Keegan DA, Morelli SS, Noyes N, Flisser ED, Berkeley AS, Grifo JA. Low ectopic pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization: do practice habits matter? Fertil Steril 2007;88:734-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.169

Cited by

  1. Reduction of multiple pregnancies in the advanced maternal age population after implementation of an elective single embryo transfer policy coupled with enhanced embryo selection: pre- and post-interv vol.30, pp.9, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev159
  2. Efficacy of hyaluronan-rich transfer medium on implantation and pregnancy rates in fresh and frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers in Korean women with previous implantation failure vol.59, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2016.59.3.201
  3. Reduced Ectopic Pregnancy Rate on Day 5 Embryo Transfer Compared with Day 3: A Meta-Analysis vol.12, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169837