DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Human Reliability Analysis for Risk Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants

원자력발전소 위험도 평가를 위한 인간신뢰도분석

  • Jung, Won-Dea (Integrated Safety Assessment Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Whan (Integrated Safety Assessment Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
  • 정원대 (한국원자력연구원, 종합안전평가부) ;
  • 김재환 (한국원자력연구원, 종합안전평가부)
  • Received : 2011.01.31
  • Accepted : 2011.02.09
  • Published : 2011.02.28

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this paper is to introduce the activities and research trends of human reliability analysis including brief summary about contents and methods of the analysis. Background: Various approaches and methods have been suggested and used to assess human reliability in field of risk assessment of nuclear power plants. However, it has noticed that there is high uncertainty in human reliability analysis which results in a major bottleneck for risk-informed activities of nuclear power plants. Method: First and second generation methods of human reliability analysis are reviewed and a few representative methods are discussed from the risk assessment perspective. The strength and weakness of each method is also examined from the viewpoint of reliability analyst as a user. In addition, new research trends in this field are briefly summarized. Results: Human reliability analysis has become an important tool to support not only risk assessment but also system design of a centralized complex system. Conclusion: Human reliability analysis should be improved by active cooperation with researchers in field of human factors. Application: The trends of human reliability analysis explained in this paper will help researchers to find interest topics to which they could contribute.

Keywords

References

  1. ANS, Standard for Level 1/Large Early Release Frequency PSA for Nuclear Power Plant Applications, ASME/ANS RA-Sa-2009, American Nuclear Society, 2009.
  2. Apostolakis, G. E. (Eds.), Special Issue on Cognitive Science Approaches to Process Control, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 36, 1992.
  3. Embrey, D., Humphreys, P., Rosa, E., Kirwan, B. and Rea, K., SLIMMAUD; An Approach to Assessing Human Error Probability Using Structured Expert Judgment, NUREG/CR-3518, Vol.I & II 1984.
  4. Lois, E., et al., International HRA Empirical Study Pilot Phase Report, OCED Halden Reactor Project, HWR-844, 2008.
  5. Hannaman, G., Spurgin, A. and Lukic, Y., Human Cognitive Reliability (HCR) Model for PRA Analysis, Draft Report, NUS-4531, EPRI Project RP2170-3, 1984.
  6. Hollnagel, E., CREAM - Cognitive reliability and error analysis method, Elsevier Science Publishers, 1998.
  7. IAEA, Human Reliability Analysis in Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants, Safety Series NO. 50-P-10, IAEA, 1994.
  8. Jung, W., Yoon, W. and Kim J., Structured information analysis for human reliability analysis of emergency tasks in nuclear power plants, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol.71, p21-32, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00067-3
  9. Jung, W., Kang, D. and Kim, J., Development of a Standard Method for Human Reliability Analysis of Nuclear Power Plants, KAERI/TR-2961, KAERI, 2005.
  10. Kim, J., Jung, W. and Park, J., A systematic approach to analyzing errors of commission from diagnosis failure in accident progression, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol.89, p137-150, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.08.021
  11. Kim, J., Jung, W. and Son, Y., The MDTA-based method for assessing diagnosis failures and their risk impacts in nuclear power plants, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol.93, p337-349, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.020
  12. Kim, J., Lee, S. and Jang, S., Analysis of human error potentials and design-related influencing factors for computer-based procedure and soft controllers to develop HRA method for ACRs, KAERI/TR-4207, KAERI, 2010.
  13. Kirwan, B., A Guide to Practical Human Reliability Assessment, Taylor & Francis, 1994.
  14. Kirwan, B., The Development of A Nuclear Chemical Plant Human Reliability Management Approach: HRMS and JHEDI, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 56, pp. 107-133, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00006-9
  15. NASA, Human-Rating Requirements for Space Systems, NASA Procedural Requirements, NPR 8705.2B, 2008.
  16. O'Hara, J. and Hall, R., Advanced control rooms and crew performance issues: implications for human reliability, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 39, pp. 919-923, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1109/23.159733
  17. Park, J., Jung, W. and Ha, J., Shin Y., Analysis of Operator's Performance under Emergencies using a Training Simulator of the Nuclear Power Plants, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol.83, p179 -186, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2003.09.009
  18. Park, J. and Jung, W., OPERA - a Human Performance Database under Simulated Emergencies of Nuclear Power Plants, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol.92, p503-519, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.01.007
  19. Rasmussen, J., Information processing and human machine interaction: an approach to cognitive engineering, New York, Elsevier, 1986.
  20. Reason, J., Human Error, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  21. Swain, A. and Guttmann, H., Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications, USNRC, NUREG/CR-1278, 1983.
  22. Swain, A., Accident Sequence Evaluation Program Human Reliability Analysis(ASEP HRA) Procedure, NUREG/CR-4772, USNRC, 1987.
  23. USNRC, The Reactor Safety Study, WASH-1400(NUREG-75/014), US NRC, 1975.
  24. USNRC, Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model, NUREG-0711, US NRC, 1994.
  25. USNRC, Technical basis and implementation guidelines for a technique for human event analysis(ATHEANA), NUREG-1624, Rev.1, US NRC, 2000.
  26. USNRC, Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model, NUREG-0711, Rev.2, US NRC, 2004.
  27. USNRC, Good Practices for Implementing Human Reliability Analysis, NUREG-1792, US NRC, 2005.
  28. USNRC, Human Event Repository Analysis(HERA) System: Overview, NUREG/CR-6903. Vol.1, US NRC, 2006.
  29. Wickens, C. and Hollands, J., Engineering psychology and human performance, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2000.
  30. Willianms, J., "A Data-Based Method for Assessing and Reducing Human Error to Improve Operational Performance," Proceedings of the IEEE 4th Conference on Human Factors in Power Plants, Monterey, California, June 6-9, 1988.