DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

인체 및 수생태 보호를 위한 지표수 우선관리대상 항목 선정기법: CRAFT (Chemical RAnking of surFacewater polluTants)

Chemical Ranking and Scoring Methodology for the Protection of Human Health and Aquatic Ecosystem in Korean Surfacewater: CRAFT (Chemical RAnking of surFacewater polluTants)

  • 남선화 (건국대학교 환경과학과) ;
  • 곽진일 (건국대학교 환경과학과) ;
  • 윤성지 (건국대학교 환경과학과) ;
  • 정승우 (군산대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 안윤주 (건국대학교 환경과학과)
  • Nam, Sun-Hwa (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kwak, Jin Il (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Yoon, Sung-Ji (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Jeong, Seung-Woo (Department of Environmental Engineering, Kunsan National University) ;
  • An, Youn-Joo (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University)
  • 투고 : 2011.07.15
  • 심사 : 2011.10.10
  • 발행 : 2011.11.30

초록

To prevent the overflow of various harmful chemicals, it is necessary to modify the chemical management system with an expansion to institutionally regulated substances. This modification should be preceded by selection of the priority chemicals, with a diverse chemical ranking system (CRS) applied to select the chemicals in developed countries. In Korea, a systematic CRS was used in a project related to soil and groundwater, however, it is inadequate to compare soil and groundwater CRS to that of surfacewater. In this study, a priority chemical ranking system for surfacewater was proposed through the analysis of international and domestic CRS cases. This was then applied to 161 chemicals to derive the priority list of harmful chemicals. As a result, Chemical RAnking of surFacewater polluTants (CRAFT) is presented for the protection of human health and the aquatic ecosystem from surfacewater pollutants. The components of CRAFT are the human health toxicity, aquatic ecosystem toxicity and reliability assessment factors. Three lists were derived from the 161 priority harmful chemicals for the protection of human health, aquatic ecosystem or both. It is expected that this result can be useful to prioritize harmful chemicals for the protection of human health and the aquatic ecosystem from Korean surfacewater.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 국립환경과학원(2008a). 사람의 건강보호항목 확대를 위한 유해물질 조사 및 관리방안 도출(II).
  2. 국립환경과학원(2008b). 지하수오염물질 우선관리대상항목 선정 연구.
  3. 국립환경과학원(2009). 사람의 건강보호항목 확대를 위한 유해물질 조사 및 관리방안 도출(III).
  4. 국립환경과학원(2010). 수질 및 수생태계 우선관리대상 항목 선정 연구.
  5. 미국화학물질안전위원회(2010). http://www.csb.gov/.
  6. 식품의약품안전청(2008). 환경유래 인체유해물질의 식품관리우선순위 예측을 위한 시스템 개발.
  7. 안윤주, 남선화, 이재관(2008). 인체 위해성기반 수질환경기준 항목 확대를 위한 연구. 한국하천호수학회지, 41(1), pp. 34-42.
  8. 유럽화학물질정보시스템(European chemical Substances Information System, ESIS) (2010). http://esis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/.
  9. 일본환경청(2007). Environmental quality standards for water http://www.env.go.jp/en/standards/.
  10. 통합위해도정보시스템(Integrated Risk Information System, IRIS) (2010). http://www.epa.gov/IRIS/.
  11. 한국화재보험협회(2010). http://www.kfpa.or.kr/index.asp/.
  12. 환경부(1999). 환경자료집.
  13. 환경부(2001). 폐수배출허용기준 적용대상물질 확대지정을 위한 연구.
  14. 환경부(2003). 위해우려물질 선정 및 평가 연구.
  15. 환경부(2007). 우선관리대상 토양오염물질 선정연구.
  16. 환경부(2008). 2006년도 화학물질 유통량 조사 결과.
  17. 환경부(2010a). 2008년도 화학물질 배출량 조사 결과.
  18. 환경부(2010b). 환경백서.
  19. 환경부, 국립환경과학원(2006). 물환경종합평가방법 개발 조사연구(III) - 인체 및 수생태계 위해성 평가체계 구축.
  20. ANZECC and ARMCANZ (2000). Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality, pp. 3.4-5.
  21. ATSDR (2005). 2005 CERCLA Priority List of Hazardous Substances that will be the Subject of Toxicological Profiles and Support Document. Division of Toxicology, Washington DC., USA.
  22. CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment) (2007). Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life: Summary Table. Updated December, 2007. In: Canadian environmental quality guidelines, 1999, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg.
  23. EC (1994). The ARET Substance Selection Process and Guidelines.
  24. ECOTOXicology (ECOTOX) (2010). http://cfpub.epa.gor/ecotox/.
  25. Hanset, B. G., van Haelst, A. G., Leeuwen, K. V., and van der Zandt, P. (1999). Priority setting for existing chemicals: European union risk ranking method. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 18(4), pp. 772-779. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620180425
  26. Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB) (2010). http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/htmlgen?HSDB/.
  27. Jeong, S. W. and An, Y. J. (2011). Construction of a chemical ranking system of soil pollution substances for screening of priority soil contaminants in Korea, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, DOI: 10.1007/s10661-011-2109-4.
  28. Snyder, E. M., Snyder, S. A., Giesy, J. P., Blonde, S. A., Hurlburt, G. K., Summer, C. L., Mitchell, R. R., and Bush, D. M. (2000). SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the north american great lakes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 7(2), pp. 116-121. https://doi.org/10.1065/espr199910.010
  29. Swanson, M. B., Davis, G. A., Kincaid, L. E., Schultz, T. W., Bartmess, J. E., Jones, S. L., and George, E. L. (1997). A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 16(2), pp. 372-383. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620160237
  30. USEPA (2007). Estimation Program Interface (EPI) Suite Version 4.00.
  31. USEPA (2009). National Recommended Water Quality Criteria.
  32. WHO IARC (2010). Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs, Volumes 1-100.