Gray and White Matter Volume Reductions Associated with Aging in Healthy Korean Adults after Exclusion of White Matter Hyperintensity: A Voxel-Based Morphometric Study

  • Youn, Young-Chul (Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Yun (Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ha, Sam-Yeol (Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kwon, Oh-Sang (Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Park, Tai-Hwan (Department of Neurology, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Kee, Baik-Seok (Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Hsiung, Ging-Yuek Robin (Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia)
  • Published : 2011.09.30

Abstract

Background: Understanding the changes of brain volume due to normal aging in healthy adults may help us better appreciate the age-related changes in the brain associated with neurodegenerative diseases. The objectives of our current study are: 1) to evaluate the volumes of gray matter, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid in healthy adult with exclusion of white matter hyperintensity and 2) to identify their regional changes in which there have been controversies. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of magnetic resonance images from 108 normal Korean subjects (42-80 yr of age) using voxel-based morphometry. Results: Global volumes of each tissue revealed no change between 5th and 6th decade and their declines afterward. There were negative correlations between gray matter (3.04 $cm^{3}$/yr) and white matter volume (2.31 $cm^{3}$/yr) and increasing age, and a positive correlation between CSF volume (5.56 $cm^{3}$/yr) and increasing age. Gray matter, white matter and CSF volume normalized with total intracranial volume demonstrated changes at 0.21%/yr, 0.16%/yr and 0.36%/yr respectively. Gray matter volume was reduced in the frontal, parietal and temporal lobes with increasing age, but not in the medial temporal lobes or posterior cingulate. White matter losses occurred in the anterior corpus callosum, frontal and other periventricular areas. Conclusions: These findings provide essential information on the rates and regional patterns of age-related changes in brain volume for a healthy Asian population, which can serve as a baseline for comparison with other pathologic conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. Jernigan TL, Archibald SL, Fennema-Notestine C, Gamst AC, Stout JC, Bonner J, et al. Effects of age on tissues and regions of the cerebrum and cerebellum. Neurobiol Aging 2001; 22: 581-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(01)00217-2
  2. Resnick SM, Pham DL, Kraut MA, Zonderman AB, Davatzikos C. Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies of older adults: a shrinking brain. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 3295-301.
  3. Michielse S, Coupland N, Camicioli R, Carter R, Seres P, Sabino J, et al. Selective effects of aging on brain white matter microstructure: a diffusion tensor imaging tractography study. Neuroimage 2010; 52: 1190-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.019
  4. Taki Y, Goto R, Evans A, Zijdenbos A, Neelin P, Lerch J, et al. Voxel-based morphometry of human brain with age and cerebrovascular risk factors. Neurobiol Aging 2004; 25: 455-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.09.002
  5. Good CD, Johnsrude IS, Ashburner J, Henson RN, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS. A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage 2001; 14(1 Pt 1): 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0786
  6. Sato K, Taki Y, Fukuda H, Kawashima R. Neuroanatomical database of normal Japanese brains. Neural Netw 2003; 16: 1301-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2003.06.004
  7. Lemaitre H, Crivello F, Grassiot B, Alperovitch A, Tzourio C, Mazoyer B. Age- and sex-related effects on the neuroanatomy of healthy elderly. Neuroimage 2005; 26: 900-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.042
  8. Allen JS, Bruss J, Brown CK, Damasio H. Normal neuroanatomical variation due to age: the major lobes and a parcellation of the temporal region. Neurobiol Aging 2005; 26: 1245-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.05.023
  9. Raz N, Lindenberger U, Rodrigue KM, Kennedy KM, Head D, Williamson A, et al. Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers. Cereb Cortex 2005; 15: 1676-89. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhi044
  10. Scahill RI, Frost C, Jenkins R, Whitwell JL, Rossor MN, Fox NC. A longitudinal study of brain volume changes in normal aging using serial registered magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol 2003; 60: 989-94. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.60.7.989
  11. Abe O, Yamasue H, Aoki S, Suga M, Yamada H, Kasai K, et al. Aging in the CNS: comparison of gray/white matter volume and diffusion tensor data. Neurobiol Aging 2008; 29: 102-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.09.003
  12. Kalpouzos G, Chetelat G, Baron JC, Landeau B, Mevel K, Godeau C, et al. Voxel-based mapping of brain gray matter volume and glucose metabolism profiles in normal aging. Neurobiol Aging 2009; 30: 112-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.05.019
  13. Sullivan EV, Marsh L, Pfefferbaum A. Preservation of hippocampal volume throughout adulthood in healthy men and women. Neurobiol Aging 2005; 26: 1093-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.09.015
  14. DeCarli C, Massaro J, Harvey D, Hald J, Tullberg M, Au R, et al. Measures of brain morphology and infarction in the framingham heart study: establishing what is normal. Neurobiol Aging 2005; 26: 491-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.05.004
  15. Fazekas F, Chawluk JB, Alavi A, Hurtig HI, Zimmerman RA. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149: 351-6. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.149.2.351
  16. Scheltens P, Barkhof F, Leys D, Pruvo JP, Nauta JJ, Vermersch P, et al. A semiquantative rating scale for the assessment of signal hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurol Sci 1993; 114: 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(93)90041-V
  17. Lancaster JL, Woldorff MG, Parsons LM, Liotti M, Freitas CS, Rainey L, et al. Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum Brain Mapp 2000; 10: 120-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0193(200007)10:3<120::AID-HBM30>3.0.CO;2-8
  18. Smith CD, Chebrolu H, Wekstein DR, Schmitt FA, Markesbery WR. Age and gender effects on human brain anatomy: a voxel-based morphometric study in healthy elderly. Neurobiol Aging 2007; 28: 1075-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.05.018
  19. Fotenos AF, Snyder AZ, Girton LE, Morris JC, Buckner RL. Normative estimates of cross-sectional and longitudinal brain volume decline in aging and AD. Neurology 2005; 64: 1032-9. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000154530.72969.11
  20. Tisserand DJ, Pruessner JC, Sanz Arigita EJ, van Boxtel MP, Evans AC, Jolles J, et al. Regional frontal cortical volumes decrease differentially in aging: an MRI study to compare volumetric approaches and voxel-based morphometry. Neuroimage 2002; 17: 657-69. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1173
  21. Pagani E, Agosta F, Rocca MA, Caputo D, Filippi M. Voxel-based analysis derived from fractional anisotropy images of white matter volume changes with aging. Neuroimage 2008; 41: 657-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.021
  22. Coleman PD, Flood DG. Neuron numbers and dendritic extent in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 1987; 8: 521-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-4580(87)90127-8
  23. Tisserand DJ, van Boxtel MP, Pruessner JC, Hofman P, Evans AC, Jolles J. A voxel-based morphometric study to determine individual differences in gray matter density associated with age and cognitive change over time. Cereb Cortex 2004; 14: 966-73. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh057
  24. Rodriguez-Aranda C, Sundet K. The frontal hypothesis of cognitive aging: factor structure and age effects on four frontal tests among healthy individuals. J Genet Psychol 2006; 167: 269-87. https://doi.org/10.3200/GNTP.167.3.269-287