DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Diagnosing Small Hepatic Cysts on Multidetector CT: an Additional Merit of Thinner Coronal Reformations

  • Hwang, Sung-Ho (Department of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital) ;
  • Yu, Jeong-Sik (Department of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital) ;
  • Chung, Jae-Joon (Department of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Joo- Hee (Department of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Whang (Department of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital)
  • Published : 2011.06.01

Abstract

Objective: We wanted to validate the additional merit of the thinner coronal reformation images from multidetector CT (MDCT) for making the diagnosis of hepatic cysts. Materials and Methods: For the 90 benign hepatic cysts confirmed on MRI, the transverse (5-mm thickness) and additional coronal (2-mm thickness) reformation images from MDCT were compared with each other in terms of the Hounsfield units (HUs) and the size of each hepatic cyst. Results: The attenuations (mean: 17.2 HUs, standard deviation: ${\pm}$ 14.4) on the thinner coronal images were significantly lower than those (mean: 40.7 HUs: standard deviation: ${\pm}$ 20.6) on the thicker transverse images for the small hepatic cysts (${\leq}$ 10 mm on the transverse image, p < 0.01). Twenty-three (79%) of the 29 cysts between 5 mm and 10 mm and 21 (51%) of 41 lesions up to 5 mm showed a mean HU value of 20 or less on the coronal reformation images. Conclusion: By reducing the partial volume effect, routine coronal reformation of MDCT with a thinner section thickness can provide another merit for making a confidential diagnosis of many small sub-centimeter hepatic cysts, and these small cysts are not easily characterized on the conventional transverse images.

Keywords

References

  1. Alfidi RJ, Haaga JR. Computed body tomography. Radiol Clin North Am 1976;14:563-570
  2. Haaga JR, Alfidi RJ, Havrilla TR, Cooperman AM, Seidelmann FE, Reich NE, et al. CT detection and aspiration of abdominal abscesses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1977;128:465-474 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.128.3.465
  3. Horton KM, Bluemke DA, Hruban RH, Soyer P, Fishman EK. CT and MR imaging of benign hepatic and biliary tumors. Radiographics 1999;19:431-451 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.19.2.g99mr04431
  4. Goodenough D, Weaver K, Davis D, LaFalce S. Volume averaging limitations of computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982;138:313-316 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.138.2.313
  5. Shirkhoda A. Diagnostic pitfalls in abdominal CT. Radiographics 1991;11:969-1002 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.11.6.1749860
  6. Federle MP, Filly RA, Moss AA. Cystic hepatic neoplasms: complementary roles of CT and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981;136:345-348 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.136.2.345
  7. Jang HJ, Lim HK, Lee WJ, Lee SJ, Yun JY, Choi D. Small hypoattenuating lesions in the liver on single-phase helical CT in preoperative patients with gastric and colorectal cancer: prevalence, significance, and differentiating features. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:718-724 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200209000-00009
  8. Patterson SA, Khalil HI, Panicek DM. MRI evaluation of small hepatic lesions in women with breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:307-312 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.04.1030
  9. Paulson EK, Harris JP, Jaffe TA, Haugan PA, Nelson RC. Acute appendicitis: added diagnostic value of coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2005;235:879-885 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2353041231
  10. Horton KM, Fishman EK. The current status of multidetector row CT and three-dimensional imaging of the small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41:199-212 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-8389(02)00121-5
  11. Kundra V, Silverman PM. Impact of multislice CT on imaging of acute abdominal disease. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41:1083-1093 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-8389(03)00117-9
  12. Wong K, Paulson EK, Nelson RC. Breath-hold three-dimensional CT of the liver with multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 2001;219:75-79 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.219.1.r01ap2475
  13. Caoili EM, Paulson EK. CT of small-bowel obstruction: another perspective using multiplanar reformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:993-998 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.4.1740993
  14. Furukawa A, Yamasaki M, Furuichi K, Yokoyama K, Nagata T, Takahashi M, et al. Helical CT in the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Radiographics 2001;21:341-355 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.21.2.g01mr05341
  15. Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, Platt JF, Francis IR, Faerber GJ, et al. Urinary tract abnormalities: initial experience with multi-detector row CT urography. Radiology 2002;222:353-360 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2222010667
  16. Prokesch RW, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF, Nino-Murcia M, Mindelzun RE, Bammer R, et al. Local staging of pancreatic carcinoma with multi-detector row CT: use of curved planar reformations initial experience. Radiology 2002;225:759-765 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2253010886
  17. Jones EC, Chezmar JL, Nelson RC, Bernardino ME. The frequency and significance of small (less than or equal to 15 mm) hepatic lesions detected by CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:535-539 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.158.3.1738990
  18. Haider MA, Amitai MM, Rappaport DC, O'Malley ME, Hanbidge AE, Redston M, et al. Multi-detector row helical CT in preoperative assessment of small (< or = 1.5 cm) liver metastases: is thinner collimation better? Radiology 2002;225:137-142 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2251011225
  19. Maki DD, Birnbaum BA, Chakraborty DP, Jacobs JE, Carvalho BM, Herman GT. Renal cyst pseudoenhancement: beamhardening effects on CT numbers. Radiology 1999;213:468-472 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv33468
  20. Birnbaum BA, Maki DD, Chakraborty DP, Jacobs JE, Babb JS. Renal cyst pseudoenhancement: evaluation with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom. Radiology 2002;225:83-90 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2251010930
  21. Hong C, Bruening R, Schoepf UJ, Bae KT, Reiser MF. Multiplanar reformat display technique in abdominal multidetector row CT imaging. Clin Imaging 2003;27:119-123 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-7071(02)00490-4
  22. Schwartz LH, Gandras EJ, Colangelo SM, Ercolani MC, Panicek DM. Prevalence and importance of small hepatic lesions found at CT in patients with cancer. Radiology 1999;210:71-74 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99ja0371
  23. Robinson PJ, Arnold P, Wilson D. Small "indeterminate" lesions on CT of the liver: a follow-up study of stability. Br J Radiol 2003;76:866-874 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/99569888
  24. Eberhardt SC, Choi PH, Bach AM, Funt SA, Felderman HE, Hann LE. Utility of sonography for small hepatic lesions found on computed tomography in patients with cancer. J Ultrasound Med 2003;22:335-343; quiz 345-336 https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2003.22.4.335
  25. Mueller GC, Hussain HK, Carlos RC, Nghiem HV, Francis IR. Effectiveness of MR imaging in characterizing small hepatic lesions: routine versus expert interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:673-680 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.3.1800673
  26. Birnbaum BA, Hindman N, Lee J, Babb JS. Multi-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom. Radiology 2007;242:109-119 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2421052066
  27. Yu JS, Kim KW, Kim YH, Jeong EK, Chien D. Comparison of multishot turbo spin echo and HASTE sequences for T2-weighted MRI of liver lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:1079-1084 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880080512
  28. Elsayes KM, Narra VR, Yin Y, Mukundan G, Lammle M, Brown JJ. Focal hepatic lesions: diagnostic value of enhancement pattern approach with contrast-enhanced 3D gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiographics 2005;25:1299-1320 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.255045180

Cited by

  1. Morphology of the distal thoracic duct and the right lymphatic duct in different head and neck pathologies: an imaging based study vol.12, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-016-0108-y
  2. LI-RADS technical requirements for CT, MRI, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound vol.43, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1325-y